• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Physics of Rollercoasters

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rollercoaster Report

Aim:

To investigate changes in gravitational potential and kinetic energy and how these changes relate to the velocity of an object.

Hypothesis:  

The velocity of an object will be greater when going down the hills of the rollercoaster and lower when going up the hills. The kinetic energy at the highest point on a hill will be lower than the kinetic energy at the lowest point.

Equipment:

  • One ball bearing (28.57g)
  • Cardboard (used to construct rollercoaster)
  • Thick blue paper
  • Metre ruler
  • Tape
  • Pair of scissors
  • Steak knife
  • String
  • Camera (digital
  • Electric scales
  • Pencil

Method:

Creating the rollercoaster

  1. Two pieces of cardboard were chosen.
  2. The “hills” of the rollercoaster were drawn onto the two pieces (which would make the two sides of the rollercoaster) using a pencil.  
  3. The two pieces were cut using a knife and taped onto a cardboard base.  
  4. A piece of thick blue paper was measured and cut to be the ramp of the rollercoaster.
  5. Tabs were cut into the paper to make it easier to attach it to the rollercoaster.
  6. Ramp was stuck between the two pieces of cardboard using tape onto the rollercoaster.

The experiment

...read more.

Middle

1.12

1.12

image01.png

Various heights

Height (cm)

1

65.7

2

40.5

3

31

4

41

5

21

6

29

Results: (the following tables and graphs were calculated using average times)

Velocity Time Table and Graph

Displacement (m)

Time (s)

Velocity m/s

0.00

0

0.000

0.32

0.56

0.571

0.43

0.62

0.694

0.61

0.80

0.756

0.95

0.96

0.990

1.11

1.12

0.987

image02.png

Kinetic Potential Energy/Velocity Table and Graph

Mass (kg)

Height (cm)

...read more.

Conclusion

Other changes that could improve our rollercoaster track include lengthening the second uphill slope or altering it to make it higher as the ball built up too much kinetic energy on the first downhill and travelled too quickly uphill, resulting in flying off the track. For a smoother run, we could have straightened the uneven bumps in the tracks by measuring the original track dimensions more accurately or applied masking tape on the curves and dips to reduce friction and the amount of energy lost by the ball.

Conclusion:

The object had the greatest velocity at the lowest points of the rollercoaster and the lowest velocity at the highest points of the rollercoaster. Therefore, there is a relationship between the height and velocity of an object, and the results supported the hypothesis.

References:

“Energy Transformation on a Roller Coaster” – 1996-2010 The Physics Classroom. Accessed 23 August 2010.

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/energy/ce.cfm

“Run a safe roller coaster” – Accessed 24 August 2010

http://www.fearofphysics.com/cgi-bin/roller.cgi?track=1&start=0&mode=wrap&phys=off&animdetail=High

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Investigating the forces acting on a trolley on a ramp

    5 star(s)

    Figure 3 - Diagram showing the forces acting on the block when the angle of the ramp balances the force of friction. In this circumstance, Fr = mg sin O because there is no acceleration, i.e. the forces are balanced.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Determination of the acceleration due to gravity (g)

    4 star(s)

    I can find out the g by calculating the gradient of the line. Gradient of the line(g) = velocity / time g = ?V / ? t = 1.16-0.4 / 0.25-0.1 = 5.07 ms-2 There is a big difference between the actual value 9.18 ms-2 and the measured value 5.07 ms-2 .

  1. Measuring The Constant g; The Acceleration Due To Gravity

    1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 The regression equation generated for the trend line is y = 9.6x, making the gradient roughly equal to the g value. The product moment correlation coefficient for this data is 0.99589, confirming to us the extremely high strength of the correlation, and therefore the consistency of my results.

  2. Objective To find the acceleration due to gravity by means of a simple ...

    Systematic Error Systematic error causes all the measurements to be shifted systematically in one direction - either larger or smaller than it would be. They cannot be reduced by repeating the experiment. They may due to: * parallax in reading the scale when viewing the scale always from one

  1. Relating the Physics of Rollercoasters to Space Travel

    As the soon as the spacecraft approaches a large body with gravity, the forces will unbalance and path of the spacecraft will curve. Satellites use this concept to orbit around the Earth. Newton's second law of motion is essentially a mathematical equation, stating that force is equal to mass times acceleration or f=ma.

  2. Force of friction

    The spring balance attached to the two blocks in pile was pulled at a constant speed. The applied force () from the spring balance was recorded. 11. The two wooden blocks were placed side by side by the rubber bands instead of piling up.

  1. Lab Report - In this lab report, it will describe the weight of the ...

    Hypothesis: As the displacement increases, the period of the pendulum to swing one whole cycle will increase. The reason which could make this hypothesis true is that increasing the displacement is similar to creating a longer distance for the pendulum to swing back and forth.

  2. Design and conduct an experiment that graphically determines whether drag force is proportional to ...

    However, the position did not increase by a factor of two. The estimated position is 1.6m because it is double of .8m. However, the actual position is 1.29m. The velocity did not increase by a factor of two unlike the drag force. Instead it increased by a factor of 1.5.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work