• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sociology Chad Walker Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance. Marxists believe that the law is part of the superstructure that is used to socialise people, which benefits capitalists. They argue that the law is only enforced on the working class and that the middle class are exempt from it as agents of social control are biased against the working class. They believe that official statistics are invalid and say that capitalists are the real criminals but explain working class crime as being due to capitalist culture being criminogenic. However, Marxists have been criticised by Neo-Marxists as well as Left Realists. Marxists believe that laws benefit capitalists and are critical of Right Wing theories such as Functionalism, the New Right and Right-Realists as they believe that the law reflects the collective conscience. Capitalists will define behaviours or activities as illegal if it affects them making money or will make things illegal if they can profit from it (such as fines for speeding). Chambliss supports this theory by suggesting that there are so many laws protecting private property because capitalists are the ones that own the private property. Snider also supports this theory as he believes that the government is reluctant to pass laws that threaten capitalists profits. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, even laws that appear to benefit people actually benefits capitalists. Chambliss argues that in order to see that capitalists control the law we need to look at decision making and non decision making. This refers to what behaviour is defined or not defined as criminal. It is evident that certain behaviours are not criminalised as they maintain capitalists profit and power. Cigarettes are not criminalised as the government can tax them thus making money from them even though they kill thousands every year. Chambliss also gives the example of a movie magnate who spends thousands of dollars on his daughters 18th birthday while people down the street are dying from poverty. People accept this type of behaviour because they have been socialised to believe that they have earned it due to living in a meritocratic society. Right Wing theories see the police as being fair and just. Marxists on the other hand are critical of this as they believe that agents of social control are biased against the working class. Chambliss' studied crime in Seattle. Syndicates owned brothels and casinos, which the working class made complaints about to the police. ...read more.

Conclusion

Neo-Marxism combines traditional Marxism with Interactionism and developed a 'fully social theory of crime and deviance' to explain crime. To explain crime you must look at the wider and immediate origins of the deviant act, the act itself, immediate and wider origins of societal reaction and the effects of labelling. Hall's 'policing the crisis' can be applied to Taylor, Walton and Young's fully social theory. The act itself was mugging; to understand this the wider and immediate origins of the crime were examined (capitalism suffering from a recession, high unemployment and crisis of hegemony); the wider and immediate origins of societal reaction were a moral panic and racist society. Hall argues that Black people were used as a scape-goat by capitalists so that they were blamed for social problems and cause class fragmentation. In terms of the effects of labelling, Hall's study showed how the label of being a criminal on Black people then led to a self fulfilling prophecy as a reaction to her behaviour of the police. In conclusion, Marxists believe that the law benefits the capitalists, is only enforced on the working class and the middle class are exempt from it, agents of social control are biased, official statistics are invalid, capitalists are the real criminals but has been criticised by Neo-Marxists for being deterministic, ignoring intra-class crime and the seriousness of working class crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Types of deviance are linked to one's place in the social structure; thus, a poor person blocked from economic opportunities may use armed robbery to achieve economic goals, whereas a stockbroker may use insider trading to achieve the same. Functionalists acknowledge that people choose whether to behave in a deviant

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    However, Miller's theories seem to contradict the very basis of functionalist sociology- that of society based on consensus- through its claim of three separate and distinct cultures with distinct and separate norms, values and behaviour- which at the very least does not seem like consensus in any form.

  1. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    The key thing is that most people control these deviant desires, they may rarely emerge, say at the office party, yet when they do we use techniques of neutralisation to provide justification for our deviant actions. Some examples include the denial of responsibility- it wasn't me, it was the

  2. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    Right Realists also put forward a complete approach to crime and deviance as they not only consider the offender, but the victims and agencies of social control. Recognition is gained that if minor crimes, such as anti-social behaviour or a broken window, are not quickly taken care of they can escalate and destroy a sense of community.

  1. Why is crime so hard to define?

    to carry out two hours of longbow practice per week (supervised by the local clergy). London Hackney Carriages (taxis/cabs) must carry a bale of hay or a sack of oats for their horse (if they've got one). It is illegal to be drunk on Licensed Premises (ie: a pub or bar).

  2. Who benefits from aid?

    means once again, the first world benefit through aid by getting cheap imports, while the third world suffer unfair prices for their goods. Brandt believes that the consequences of his theory of interdependence are positive political effects on both the first world and the third world.

  1. Describe competing criminological theories

    Holli (1989) found that the results from such studies differ according to the kind of bad stimuli's used. When weak performance was mixed with physical pain, psychopaths achieved poorer results than controls. Psychopaths were however, improved leaner's when the outcome was a pecuniary punishment.

  2. Examine some of the ways in which Marxists explain crime.

    This aloud for a greater profit to be made. He found that crimes was in every single strata of society, it was merely the fact that lower classes were being caught that made it seem like it was a working class problem. As the police focused more attention looking to the working classes for the criminal behaviour the upper classes were left alone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work