• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Education and the theories of Marxism

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Melissa Wild Miss Flynn - Sociology Marxism Questions a) Explain what is meant by ?hidden curriculum?. (2marks) All the things taught throughout everyday lives at school which are not formally examined or outlined in the formal curriculum such as obedience, conformity, social control, ethnocentricity and competitiveness for example. b) Suggest 3 other institutions in society that might control people?s ideas and beliefs? apart from education. (6marks) Religion is a big factor in controlling peoples idea?s and beliefs as this is present all over the world not just in our society, also the Media is said to be a growing controller of people?s ideas. Also the Government can control people?s ideas through controlling how society is run through social policy and this will have a significant impact on people?s ideas. c) Outline the postmodernist view of the role of education. (12 marks) Postmodernists claim that society has entered a new phase and is now completely different from the modern society that Marxists and Functionalists have written about. They reject the idea that we live in two-class society and argue that class divisions are no longer important and that society is much more diverse and fragmented so therefore the education system is. ...read more.


Like other Marxists, Bourdieu argues that the main function of education is to reproduce and legitimize ruling class culture and power. Another important function of education is to socialize the working class into a ?culture of failure? so that they take up, without question, routine and dull work. Bowles and Gintis examine this idea further in their correspondence theory. In their view the education system helps to prevent the poor from rebelling against the system by legitimising class inequalities through producing ideologies that justify inequality. Unlike functionalists such as Parsons, Bowles and Gintis argue that meritocracy does not in fact exist. Evidence shows that the main factor determining whether someone has a high income or not is their family and class background not their ability in education, this clearly supports Bowles and Gintis?s point, this is justified by the ?poor-are-dumb? theory of failure. Morrow and Torress criticise Marxists for taking a class first approach that sees class as key and ignores other factors. Feminist?s make the point eg: Madeline MacDonald that Marxists ignore the fact that schools reproduce not only capitalism but patriarchy too. Bowles and Gintis moved on to develop Althusser?s ideas further they argue that there are close counterparts between schooling and work in the capitalist system. ...read more.


However critics argue that Willis? account of the lads portrays them as working-class heroes despite their anti-social behaviour and sexist attitudes. His small scale study of only 12 boys in one school is unrepresentative of other pupils and you wouldn?t be able to generalise from his findings. A further criticism is made by the Feminist Angela McRobbie who points out that females are largely absent from Willis? study. However, Willis? work has stimulated a great deal of research into how education reproduces and legitimises other inequalities, for example ethnic and gender inequalities. Another criticism of Willis is that he largely ignores the full range of subcultures within schools. Many pupils fall somewhere in between total conformity and total rejection of school values. The Marxist perspective is generally a conflict view on the education system, however many disagree on how the education system is negative for the proletariat/working class. Post-modernists particularly challenge the Marxist viewpoint as outdated, and think that the education system Marxists describe is no longer relevant to today?s society, rather they state that the economy has now shifted away from assembly line mass production and boring factory work and instead requires a skilled adaptable workforce, rather than the low-skilled low-paid obedient workers Willis & Bowles and Gintis describe. They insist that the education system of today must encourage lifelong retraining, motivation, self-supervision and creativity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. The education system is meritocratic

    curriculum subjects your talent at that subject is wasted because it may lead the child to think that they are not good at that subject so give up which wastes their talent and because of this equality of opportunity is not provided so therefore a system of meritocracy can't exist.

  2. essay question sociology - education

    the student from upper class and workers are from the lower class. The interactionists say that all the theories emphasize on society and the education system and not on the student themselves, therefore they argue that failure is due to the student.

  1. sociology of education

    Schools received funding for each child, so schools at the top were generating more finance, and as schools wanted to remain at the top they were selecting pupils they thought would generate positive results and therefore keep the school at the top of the league.

  2. Changes in the social structure of education and its impact on class and gender ...

    class children who did manage to get into grammar school dropped out or failed to get 3 GCE O level passes. Social inequality was not only embedded in the system, it was made to seem normal, inevitable and justified on the basis of objective testing.

  1. Sociological Theories

    Like functionalists, Marxist also believes this as well. They say that it is vital to teach of rules and good behaviour as this helps with the reproduction process www.sociology.org.uk/marxism.doc (accessed 09/12/09). Functionalism and Marxism also see eye to eye in that education teaches individuals specific skills necessary for future occupations.

  2. Assess The Extent To Which Marxist & Feminist Theories Help Our Understanding Of Religion ...

    However, the Marxist view of religion does not exactly help us understand the complete role of religion in society. While Marxists argue that religion mainly maintains ruling class power, it is widely rejected that this is the primary role of religion.

  1. Outline and discuss the contribution made by Marxism to our understanding of society

    He stated that men's efforts to control women's labour had gradually become institutionalised through the nuclear family. This theory has influenced sociologists such as Coontz and Henderson (1986), to explain the subordination of women (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008). Other sociologists such as Radical Feminist Kate Millett, have used this theory

  2. The Contrasting Views of Education from the Marxists and Functionalists Perspective.

    Marxists Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue that meritocracy is an illusion of opportunity and equality. Bowels and Gintis found that meritocracy did not reflect on IQ results (1976). Statistics from the National Pupils Database found that pupils eligible for free school meals where less likely to achieve five or more

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work