• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Education and the theories of Marxism

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Melissa Wild Miss Flynn - Sociology Marxism Questions a) Explain what is meant by ?hidden curriculum?. (2marks) All the things taught throughout everyday lives at school which are not formally examined or outlined in the formal curriculum such as obedience, conformity, social control, ethnocentricity and competitiveness for example. b) Suggest 3 other institutions in society that might control people?s ideas and beliefs? apart from education. (6marks) Religion is a big factor in controlling peoples idea?s and beliefs as this is present all over the world not just in our society, also the Media is said to be a growing controller of people?s ideas. Also the Government can control people?s ideas through controlling how society is run through social policy and this will have a significant impact on people?s ideas. c) Outline the postmodernist view of the role of education. (12 marks) Postmodernists claim that society has entered a new phase and is now completely different from the modern society that Marxists and Functionalists have written about. They reject the idea that we live in two-class society and argue that class divisions are no longer important and that society is much more diverse and fragmented so therefore the education system is. ...read more.


Like other Marxists, Bourdieu argues that the main function of education is to reproduce and legitimize ruling class culture and power. Another important function of education is to socialize the working class into a ?culture of failure? so that they take up, without question, routine and dull work. Bowles and Gintis examine this idea further in their correspondence theory. In their view the education system helps to prevent the poor from rebelling against the system by legitimising class inequalities through producing ideologies that justify inequality. Unlike functionalists such as Parsons, Bowles and Gintis argue that meritocracy does not in fact exist. Evidence shows that the main factor determining whether someone has a high income or not is their family and class background not their ability in education, this clearly supports Bowles and Gintis?s point, this is justified by the ?poor-are-dumb? theory of failure. Morrow and Torress criticise Marxists for taking a class first approach that sees class as key and ignores other factors. Feminist?s make the point eg: Madeline MacDonald that Marxists ignore the fact that schools reproduce not only capitalism but patriarchy too. Bowles and Gintis moved on to develop Althusser?s ideas further they argue that there are close counterparts between schooling and work in the capitalist system. ...read more.


However critics argue that Willis? account of the lads portrays them as working-class heroes despite their anti-social behaviour and sexist attitudes. His small scale study of only 12 boys in one school is unrepresentative of other pupils and you wouldn?t be able to generalise from his findings. A further criticism is made by the Feminist Angela McRobbie who points out that females are largely absent from Willis? study. However, Willis? work has stimulated a great deal of research into how education reproduces and legitimises other inequalities, for example ethnic and gender inequalities. Another criticism of Willis is that he largely ignores the full range of subcultures within schools. Many pupils fall somewhere in between total conformity and total rejection of school values. The Marxist perspective is generally a conflict view on the education system, however many disagree on how the education system is negative for the proletariat/working class. Post-modernists particularly challenge the Marxist viewpoint as outdated, and think that the education system Marxists describe is no longer relevant to today?s society, rather they state that the economy has now shifted away from assembly line mass production and boring factory work and instead requires a skilled adaptable workforce, rather than the low-skilled low-paid obedient workers Willis & Bowles and Gintis describe. They insist that the education system of today must encourage lifelong retraining, motivation, self-supervision and creativity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. The education system is meritocratic

    curriculum subjects your talent at that subject is wasted because it may lead the child to think that they are not good at that subject so give up which wastes their talent and because of this equality of opportunity is not provided so therefore a system of meritocracy can't exist.

  2. essay question sociology - education

    The integrationists' talk about typing; when students are classified by their teachers, labeling is when the student is made aware of the teachers view about him and self-fulfilling prophecy is when the child believes in the label and behaves accordingly therefore fulfilling the label the teacher attached.Hargreaves, Hester and Mellor

  1. Changes in the social structure of education and its impact on class and gender ...

    Current economic changes were also a driving force. The decline in the manufacturing industry meant fewer manual or vocational jobs, and technological changes produced an increasing demand for a better educated workforce. The role of comprehensive education was to respond to the changing economic needs of the country by producing a highly educated, skilled workforce.

  2. sociology of education

    Schools received funding for each child, so schools at the top were generating more finance, and as schools wanted to remain at the top they were selecting pupils they thought would generate positive results and therefore keep the school at the top of the league.

  1. Sociological Theories

    Talcott Parsons sees the educational system as an important tool for the selection of individuals for their future role in society. Marxist also believes this and says that education prepares children to accept their future exploitation and gives them qualifications to match their adult work roles.

  2. Assess the claim that the main function of education is to maintain a value ...

    the popularity of Sociology can hardly be seen as promoting passive people. * Teachers are seen as agents of capitalism and pupils its victims, however many teachers are radicals who choose teaching to express their own victims. * Their theory was developed in the 1970's so is a little outdated.

  1. Outline and discuss the contribution made by Marxism to our understanding of society

    He stated that men's efforts to control women's labour had gradually become institutionalised through the nuclear family. This theory has influenced sociologists such as Coontz and Henderson (1986), to explain the subordination of women (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008). Other sociologists such as Radical Feminist Kate Millett, have used this theory

  2. The Contrasting Views of Education from the Marxists and Functionalists Perspective.

    Parsons argues that education implements values of competition, supports individualism and equality; people who do not work hard do not deserve better jobs. Marxists disagree and call meritocracy a ?myth?. Children from working class families tend have similar jobs as their parents.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work