• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the similarities and differences between subcultural theory and strain theory as explanations of deviant behaviour

Extracts from this document...


Examine the similarities and differences between subcultural theory and strain theory as explanations of deviant behaviour Subcultural theory explains deviance in terms of the existence of social groups, which hold different values to that of mainstream society. Strain theory on the other hand, explains deviance in terms of people who are placed in a position where they are unable to conform to mainstream values, for example the lower classes. While strain theory doesn't use the term subcultures, it does however attempt to give reasons why some groups in society are more likely to be deviant. Sociologist Merton (1938) attempted to expand on Durkheim's concept of anomie and explain what causes crime within society. He argued that society ascribed to a dominant value with was to 'get rich quick', however only the minority within society had the legitimate means to achieve this success; such as opportunities within education, talent and hard work. He argues further that deviance is found naturally within society and Merton believed that it was society itself which causes it. Further, Merton believed that when societal norms, or socially accepted goals (such as the American Dream), place pressure on the individual to conform they force the individual to either work within the structure society has produced, or instead, become members of a deviant subculture. ...read more.


Working class youths internalise mainstream norms and values through socialisation. Working class youths face blocked opportunities (e.g. at school) because of their position in the social class structure. Working class youths as a whole (groups not just individuals) suffer from status frustration (realise that they cannot achieve in middle class terms). But, Cohen extends Merton's theory by incorporating a strong cultural element in his explanation. Some working class youths make a decision to completely reject mainstream norms and values. This is because of the status frustration they feel. Mainstream norms and values are replaced with alternative delinquent subcultural norms and values. For Cohen a high value is placed on non-financial negativistic delinquent acts. For example, joy riding, arson and vandalism. The delinquent subculture provides an alternative means of gaining status and striking back at an unequal social system that has branded them as 'failures'. Cloward and Ohlin accept Cohen's views on the structural origins of crime and deviance. However, Cloward and Ohlin criticise Cohen's cultural explanation of crime. In particular, his failure to explain the variety of subcultural forms that emerges out of the social structure. Cloward and Ohlin maintain that the form working class delinquent subcultures take depends on access to criminal networks. ...read more.


Furthermore, Subcultural theories have been criticised on a theoretical level. The phenomenologist Matza (1964) criticises subcultural theories for over-estimating juvenile delinquency. They do this by assuming that membership of delinquent subcultures is permanent. He argues that individuals drift in and out of delinquency, employing techniques of neutralisation (e.g. they deserved it) as they do so, and therefore crime and deviance is temporary and episodic (every now and gain). This suggests that subcultural theories only offer a partial view on crime and deviance. In conclusion, some argue that the difference between subcultural and strain theory is that subculture theory offers an account of deviance/crime that is located within the participants own term of reference and understanding whereas, strain theory suggest a variety of responses to situations of frustration, not just criminal activity. However, there are some criticisms to both theories. Strain theory does not spell out way any one individual becomes a retatist rather than a rebel, for example also subcultural theory forces exclusively on delinquent boys and ignores phenomena such as female gangs. However, both theories have one thing in common which is that they assume that most crime is committed by the lower classes and ignore white-collar and other types of crimes of the powerful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Convicted criminals are formally and publicly labelled wrongdoers, treated with suspicion even afterward. Labelling theory helps explain why convicts released from prison have such high rates of recidivism (return to criminal activities). The label "criminal" or "ex-con" creates great difficulty in finding legitimate employment.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Retreatist Subculture- Faced with a failure in both mainstream society and in the crime and gang cultures (a double failure), some lower working-class youths will develop a retreatist subculture where they retreat into drugs and alcoholism. Much like Merton's Retreatists.

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    The young men have role models within the society, from whom they can learn the tricks of the trade. From this they can climb the social ladder within that society by committing crime and developing into criminal hierarchy; this brings them success and gives them monetary gain.

  2. Marxism is a structural theory, as people's actions are shaped by society and in ...

    The reasons Sutherland suggested for this were: * Judges are from similar social backgrounds and tended not to think of white collar criminals as 'criminal types' * Their crimes are not considered dangerous to the public such as muggers * Victims of white collar crimes are not physically hurt as other victims are e.g.

  1. subcultural theory

    then they would seek alternative and deviant ways of achieving what they wanted. Merton used Durkheim's concept of "Anomie" to describe this situation. However, for Merton the concept of anomie meant a discontinuity between cultural goals and the legitimate means available for reaching them.

  2. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Another form identified by Merton is Innovation, where the individual accepts the goals of society, but uses different ways to achieve these goals, so the outcome may result in the person being involved in deviant activity, such as soft drug dealers, who long for the materialistic possessions, yet instead of working legitimately, they get their money through deviant behaviour.

  1. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    So one reason for there being numerous theories is that whilst there have been great changes through the decades and centuries reflecting changing social attitudes, previous theories which may now have been dismissed still remain in literature and are still referred to.

  2. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    Hirschi views parents, schools, and peers as important social institutions from which a person develops these attachments. The second element of the bond is commitment and it involves time, energy, and effort placed on conventional lines of action. This is the rational component in conformity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work