• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Some People are just Born Deviant. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Some People are just Born Deviant. Discuss. When a new life is brought into the world, does the infant have to go through a deviant aptitude test to ascertain whether the child is going to act outside of the accepted social norms of that society? Genetics are still some way from being able to allude to this, but perhaps one could envisage a future where this is realised, and becomes the accepted norm. However do we really know whether a person is born with deviant aspects within them or is if a learnt behaviour? Cesare Lombroso (1876) whom was influenced by Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution popularised the theory of a born criminal through biological determinism, believing that an individual has physiognomic attributes or deformities which equate that person to having criminal behaviour in them. By using a method called positivist science, he hoped to find out whether criminality was inherited, then the born criminal could be distinguished by physical atavistic stigmata, such as, large jaw; low sloping forehead; high cheekbones; hawk-like nose; fleshy lips and insensitive to pain. This was Lombroso's attempted to introduce a scientific methodology, so a person can predict whether that individual is going to have criminal behaviour, and if so isolate that individual. ...read more.

Middle

Hence the revolutionary theory of delinquent subculture, the working class collectively coming together due to the problems of the lower working classes achievements. "The delinquent subculture not only rejects the mainstream culture, it also reverses it" according to Haralambos (2008, p325) Cohen's words echo this, "the delinquent subcultures takes its norms from the larger culture but turn them upside down" (ibid). Walter Miller (1958) agreed with Cohen that there was a delinquency subculture, but his argument sided with the theory that it was down to the lower classes way of life. Several other theorists studied gang culture, but in regards of environmental and economic class. Fredric M. Thrasher (1927) studied gangs in a methodical way. Along with functionalists such as Durkheim and Merton, he summarized that delinquent behaviour was due to environmental conditions, and more importantly the adolescence years of mischief the individual interacts with. Finally to summaries subcultural theories, Stanley Cohen (1972) conducted a study in East London, during the early 1970s. He examined two subcultural youth movements that reacted to the evolving community of the era. Suggesting two things, the MOD culture appeared to be a reaction which was due to the new ideological influences within our lives, they wanted to be able to show they had money, and wasn't afraid to spend it, whereas the skinheads culture was a throwback to a more traditional working class community. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally one of the most prominent individuals in regards to deviance is Robert K. Merton, a functionalist who introduced the "Modes of Adaptation". This included conformity which he recognised as the most common type of the five. During this mode, people strive to obtain success. Innovation is the substantial change in the perspective of the people whose mode is still in conformity and that of whom has shifted to innovation. Next rebellion completely rejects the story that everybody in society can achieve success and have embraced a rebellious state. Retreatism is identified by Merton as the escapist response, this occurs when people become practical dropouts of society. Finally ritualism, the individual realises that they have no real value or chance to advance in society and they concentrate on retaining what little they have. Hence perhaps those individuals of society decide to become deviant, whether through looming criminality. Perhaps this could be observed as embellishing subculural differences in society. Are people just born deviant? This theory is still to be proved from a plausible scientific understanding, which can be readily understood by society. Until that time, we are still in the dominion of the guessing game over an individual's destiny, perhaps that Irish playwright and poet Samuel Beckett knew something we didn't when he said "What do I know of man's destiny? I could tell you more about radishes" (1974, p60). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    'The central tenet of left realism is to reflect the reality of crime that is in its origins, its nature and its impact. This involves a rejection of tendencies to romanticize crime or to pathologize it, to analyse solely from the point of view of the administration of crime or

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    so to satisfy society they carry out the role of a deviant to the extent that they are fitting in with what they perceive is their role in life or in the society. This makes a great impact on their life, as they need someone to help them to see

  1. Examine the similarities and differences between subcultural theory and strain theory as explanations of ...

    Both examples took alternate routes to reaching the socially constructed goal. Both of these groups have rejected the goals and the means to reach them. The retreatist will stop engaging in society altogether and instead might live in solidarity or in communes with likeminded individuals.

  2. Examine the similarities and differences between the sub cultural theories and the strain theory ...

    This is as true today as it was in the 1950's, for vandalism typically accounts for about 18% of current crime recorded by the British Crime Survey. According to Cohen, 'lower-class' boys strove to emulate middle-class values and aspirations, but lacked the means to attain success.

  1. subcultural theory

    This evidence suggests that members of society who are stuck at the bottom of the stratification system can become frustrated at their position in society, as they are unable to attain their goals.

  2. Deviance in Society A person would be considered to be acting deviantly in society ...

    The acts that they perform, in this idea, are not significant to the criminals, but it is the social reaction to them that is (Overview 1). The response and label from other individuals in society, such as peers, are how the individuals view themselves.

  1. Two biological explantions of criminality

    (Rowe 1990) They collected information from self-report questionnaires on personal delinquent peers from 308 sets of twins in schools in Ohio and included 265 sets of same sex-twins and 43 opposite sex twins, as well as a small non twin sibling control group.

  2. What is a gang?

    When a new member joins a gang, he must usually go through an initiation. Initiations don't usually involve elaborate ceremonies or formalities, but the initiate will have to endure certain rites. The most common is "jumping in," a beating issued by all the gang members.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work