• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the uses of both qualitative and quantitative research methods for the criminological understanding of patterns and trends of crime and victimisation?

Extracts from this document...


What are the uses of both qualitative and quantitative research methods for the criminological understanding of patterns and trends of crime and victimisation? Both quantitative and qualitative research methods help successfully provoke the required data for the criminological understanding of patterns and trends of crime and victimisation. Both methods have disadvantages and advantages linked with requiring the needed data, it can be argued that one method is more beneficial than the other due to the nature of this research yet it can also be argued that both research methods combined will be able to successfully provoke the required data drawing attention not only to cause and affect but also the numerical data which can help highlight the crime which is most significant in the contemporary UK. Quantitative methods provoke numerical data which can be tabulated. It can take the form of questionnaires, surveys and structured interviews. Quantitative methods produce results which have to be transcribed and can take the form of unstructured interviews, case studies and covert and overt observations. Qualitative research methods provoke rich and multi dimensional data which is high in validity. The nature of the question being examined is highly sensitive; therefore it would be proven to use quantitative methods which can take the form of an unstructured interview. ...read more.


Added to this, this method is not reliable as it is unlikely that the same answers will be provoked if asked again. Therefore it lowers reliability and makes it difficult to generalise, quantify or get a representative sample. It is not a systematic method. With no preset questions and relying on the skills of the interviewer the results are difficult to verify and reliability is inevitably lowered. The interviewers presence and the way questions are asked may affect results. This means it can lack objectivity. The interviewer may even offer their own opinions which may bias the results regarding criminological understanding of patterns and trends of crime and victimisation. The interviewer may be too close to the subject and alter their findings without realising. Thus having a direct effect on the results causing them to be unreliable and unrepresentative. Bias may also occur during the detailed analysis process. Finally the experiment can be seen as unnatural; therefore the validity of the results must be questioned. Qualitative data is a cheap reliable method which provokes representative results which can be generalised as regards to criminological understanding of patterns and trends of crime and anti social behaviour. The researcher already knows clearly in advance what trends and patterns they want to identify which makes it a quick method. ...read more.


This method also helps to build up rapport between the interviewer and the interviewee which may help with the validity of the results which is a positive factor. Added to this fact is the interviewee may give out more information to the researcher due to the fact that they are able to talk freely, although this is a longer process and more costly than other research methods on the whole it is a lot more effective. Another benefit of using this method is that crimes that may have previously been ignored in the official crime statistic come to light, given a more representative understanding of crime patterns and victimisation. However we must not dismiss quantitative methods as theses methods as these help us find the cause and effect and produce much needed numerical statistics which help to reinforce or dismiss peoples opinion of crime. It also a cheaper method which is highly reliable and can be replicated- surely a positive characteristic which can not be taken into account when using quantitative methods. To conclude I feel that the best approach when attempting to look at the criminological understanding of trends and patterns o crime and victimisation. By using multiple methods you are able to collect multiple methods of data which helps to show the understanding of patterns and crime and victimisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    Gottfredson and Hirschi developed these earlier theories and assessed other social and psychological theories to conclude with their general theory of crime, which evolves around self control. The theory is tautological in its explanation of criminality and self control and suggests that self control is criminality and vice versa.

  2. Literature Review: The Impact of Heroin Prices on Robbery Trends

    He clearly explains that the demand of heroin is inelastic; this occurs 'when the commodity is something that people want so badly that they don't think much about price.'20 Therefore, it is does not matter how much the price of heroin increases, because people will always continue to purchase this addictive drug.

  1. This research project attempts to contrast local crime trends with the British Crime Survey ...

    the attitudes to crime and to ascertain whether participants were satisfied with policing policies. The questions were fixed choice questions. This research method was used, as firstly, it is relatively cheap. Secondly, it maintains the anonymity of the participants and therefore lies within the British ethical guidelines.

  2. anti-social behaviour

    generation and two adolescents one male, one female to uncover contrasting gender views on ASBO's. They were debriefed on the investigation and were provided with a set of standardised instructions (see appendix 2). A suitable time and meeting place was arranged for the interviews to be conducted.

  1. Crime and Ethnicity

    GCSE 84% 3% 10% 33% A Level 4% 2% 30% 2% Degree 6% 80% 40% 25% PHD 1% 5% 19% 0% Other 5% 10% 1% 40% Total= 100% 100% 100% 100% What is the ethnicity of the majority of your peers?

  2. Describe competing criminological theories

    Low extroversion is occasionally referred to as introversion. In the situation of neuroticism, someone with a relatively high score would be considered as neurotic and someone with a relatively low score would be considered stable. Scores are acquired by administration of a personality survey of which there are numerous versions.

  1. How important is gender to an understanding of crime?

    Women commit a small share of all crime, whilst the overall share of female crime appears to have remained fairly stable. In 1984, 84 per cent of known offenders were male, whilst in 1999, the corresponding figure was 83 per cent.

  2. 'Feminist theorising and research on crime within the family has transformed fundamentally criminological understanding ...

    Radical feminist criminology has described male violence against women as a 'unitary phenomenon' (Edwards, 1987)2. Radical feminists have described violence by men towards women as the "basis of men's control over women"3. To understand domestic violence as a problem of crime, the construction of masculinity must be examined in a sexist society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work