• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V In this essay I will be comparing the treatment of the Battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Brannagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. The Olivier version was made in 1945 nearing the end of the Second World War, it was deliberately made to give the British workers, those who had been left at home, and the members of the British army, a boost of moral and a taste of the glory that was in sight. Henry V was a good choice as battle, which, with the correct editing, could easily seem as if the British were fighting a just battle against the evil French. The film was created in a time where colour had been recently introduced into film so Olivier took full advantage of this by using the shiniest of breastplates and the most colourful of clothing on the British soldiers to make them look glorious. ...read more.

Middle

Realism is portrayed as scenes of looting and attacking in gangs against a single other fighter are shown. The scene in which the luggage boys are slaughtered is kept in both versions of the battle and they are directed fairly similarly, however, they are kept for different reasons. In the Olivier version this is showing that the French are treacherous and adds to the idea of the English trying to fight a just, fair battle against the evil French. On the other hand in the Branagh version the treachery of the French is just adding to the overall horror of battle. The King's speeches in the Branagh version are shot at eye level as he stands down with the men showing that he is leading the group from within but at the same time no better as a person than his men. The first factor I am going to discuss is realism contained in each of the films, in the Olivier version the bulk of the film appears rather unrealistic. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main objectives of this film is to show the real side of not only this period but of how battles have been and still are. There is no attempt to mislead the viewer in how green the grass of the battlefield is but it shows the battle as it most probably was. The first point is the state of the battlefield, which starts off reasonably muddy but throughout the duration of the battle, gets progressively worse. The mud is churned up by the hooves of the horses and begins to show on the characters, as it would. This compared to when the French walk through the mud in the Olivier version and stay immaculately clean is a vast improvement of material realism. The deaths are also of high detail and the gore is not toned down for viewing purposes, as Branagh wants it all to be seen. Post battle the effects of the fight are evident on the fighters as they look exhausted and their clothes are worn and muddy. Cuts and blood cover their visible skin and their faces have grim expressions of loss and anger. Sam Piercy 10 Gordon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    the editor would be biased towards Britain so facts that make the British Military look bad maybe left out. This article confirms the Battle of Britain myth, "A few young men" The paper encourages people to join in with the war effort.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Furthermore, The RAF had a lack of qualified pilots and a lack of planes. A lot of the RAF's strength had been used up in France. So in stepped Lord Beaverbrook, the newly appointed minister for air production. He began to turn things around by reorganizing airplane production and repair units.

  1. Consider the way in which Shakespeare presents Martius in the early part of the ...

    Volumnia maintains that she would sooner have 'eleven (sons) die nobly for their country than one voluptuously surfeit out of action'. It is growing up with the encouragement of this sort of mentality that has shaped Martius into a callous autocrat.

  2. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    The French in this film may have represented the Germans in the war as the enemy. In the battle the enemy is shown as evil to make the audience feel they're doing the right thing fighting evil. Branagh's film was set many years later when society was more immune to shocking films and television programmes.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Three stations were briefly taken off the air but were back working within six hours. The raids appeared to show that the British radars were difficult to knock out for any length of time. But the Luftwaffe's failure to mount repeated attacks on them allowed the RAF to get the radar stations back on the air.

  2. "With reference to the chosen sequence from the Gladiator, write an analysis which focuses ...

    The battle sequence starts and the gate opens in slow motion along with the battle axe which strikes a gladiator in the face. When he is struck the slow motion stops and from here the battle sequence is filmed in real time.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    She sincerely believes that if Britain had been invaded the War may have had a different outcome, but she also mentioned the fact that if Hitler hadn't bombed pearl harbour, the Americans would have kept to themselves. But since they did, America joined the allies, and with the massive American force and Britain's exceptional Navy, the war was won.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    and that this was the turning point in World War two because the British saved the world from Nazism, also the civilians believed that the British were unstoppable. The popular myth was spread very quickly through propaganda e.g. posters, newsreels, newspapers etc, also in Churchill's speeches, which were put on

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work