• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V In this essay I will be comparing the treatment of the Battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Brannagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. The Olivier version was made in 1945 nearing the end of the Second World War, it was deliberately made to give the British workers, those who had been left at home, and the members of the British army, a boost of moral and a taste of the glory that was in sight. Henry V was a good choice as battle, which, with the correct editing, could easily seem as if the British were fighting a just battle against the evil French. The film was created in a time where colour had been recently introduced into film so Olivier took full advantage of this by using the shiniest of breastplates and the most colourful of clothing on the British soldiers to make them look glorious. ...read more.

Middle

Realism is portrayed as scenes of looting and attacking in gangs against a single other fighter are shown. The scene in which the luggage boys are slaughtered is kept in both versions of the battle and they are directed fairly similarly, however, they are kept for different reasons. In the Olivier version this is showing that the French are treacherous and adds to the idea of the English trying to fight a just, fair battle against the evil French. On the other hand in the Branagh version the treachery of the French is just adding to the overall horror of battle. The King's speeches in the Branagh version are shot at eye level as he stands down with the men showing that he is leading the group from within but at the same time no better as a person than his men. The first factor I am going to discuss is realism contained in each of the films, in the Olivier version the bulk of the film appears rather unrealistic. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main objectives of this film is to show the real side of not only this period but of how battles have been and still are. There is no attempt to mislead the viewer in how green the grass of the battlefield is but it shows the battle as it most probably was. The first point is the state of the battlefield, which starts off reasonably muddy but throughout the duration of the battle, gets progressively worse. The mud is churned up by the hooves of the horses and begins to show on the characters, as it would. This compared to when the French walk through the mud in the Olivier version and stay immaculately clean is a vast improvement of material realism. The deaths are also of high detail and the gore is not toned down for viewing purposes, as Branagh wants it all to be seen. Post battle the effects of the fight are evident on the fighters as they look exhausted and their clothes are worn and muddy. Cuts and blood cover their visible skin and their faces have grim expressions of loss and anger. Sam Piercy 10 Gordon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    therefore there is a definite trend in the way most of these interpretations describe the battle. The Later Interpretations Stories always tend to change as time progresses, and the later these interpretations were written, the less sensitive they are to the importance of the battle, and the exact reasons for their victory.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    This metal would just have been dumped though, because metal was plentiful, pilots were not. Before the battle started Britain also had good reserves of planes so this was useful in preparation for the battle. The defence system was backed by the Royal Observer Corps (ROC), which used such basics as binoculars to detect German planes from various look-outs.

  1. The Battle of Britain

    "the few are mentioned because they cannot be omitted and have some validity. It is written by a distinguished Cambridge historian, well researched an expert evaluates evidence and brings a balanced conclusion. He appeals to wide audience not just students but the British public too.

  2. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    The French in this film may have represented the Germans in the war as the enemy. In the battle the enemy is shown as evil to make the audience feel they're doing the right thing fighting evil. Branagh's film was set many years later when society was more immune to shocking films and television programmes.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Reports from radar and observers were passed back to 'filtering stations' that sorted and organised the information. This was then passed on to the Fighter Command headquarters at Stanmore and the HQ of each fighter Group. The information would appear on plotting tables: large maps on which counters marking the incoming raids would be moved.

  2. "With reference to the chosen sequence from the Gladiator, write an analysis which focuses ...

    The crowds chant gets louder and louder and the gladiators are now feeling afraid as some start to shake and tremble. The camera here is also shot from a high angle giving the gladiators a sense of vulnerability compared to their opponents.

  1. Consider the way in which Shakespeare presents Martius in the early part of the ...

    Here, the implication is that Martius is as proud as he is righteous. It is interesting to note here that every single epithet used to describe the acclaimed soldier so far in the scene has been derogatory. Another interesting insight provided by the mob in this section is that on Volumnia, who is Caius Martius' mother.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    This phrase makes the pilots sound brave. Their 'finest hour' was a phrase used to describe the Battle of Britain as being the pilots 'finest hour'. These two phrases were frequently repeated by Winston Churchill (British Prime Minister at the time).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work