• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V In this essay I will be comparing the treatment of the Battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Brannagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. The Olivier version was made in 1945 nearing the end of the Second World War, it was deliberately made to give the British workers, those who had been left at home, and the members of the British army, a boost of moral and a taste of the glory that was in sight. Henry V was a good choice as battle, which, with the correct editing, could easily seem as if the British were fighting a just battle against the evil French. The film was created in a time where colour had been recently introduced into film so Olivier took full advantage of this by using the shiniest of breastplates and the most colourful of clothing on the British soldiers to make them look glorious. ...read more.

Middle

Realism is portrayed as scenes of looting and attacking in gangs against a single other fighter are shown. The scene in which the luggage boys are slaughtered is kept in both versions of the battle and they are directed fairly similarly, however, they are kept for different reasons. In the Olivier version this is showing that the French are treacherous and adds to the idea of the English trying to fight a just, fair battle against the evil French. On the other hand in the Branagh version the treachery of the French is just adding to the overall horror of battle. The King's speeches in the Branagh version are shot at eye level as he stands down with the men showing that he is leading the group from within but at the same time no better as a person than his men. The first factor I am going to discuss is realism contained in each of the films, in the Olivier version the bulk of the film appears rather unrealistic. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main objectives of this film is to show the real side of not only this period but of how battles have been and still are. There is no attempt to mislead the viewer in how green the grass of the battlefield is but it shows the battle as it most probably was. The first point is the state of the battlefield, which starts off reasonably muddy but throughout the duration of the battle, gets progressively worse. The mud is churned up by the hooves of the horses and begins to show on the characters, as it would. This compared to when the French walk through the mud in the Olivier version and stay immaculately clean is a vast improvement of material realism. The deaths are also of high detail and the gore is not toned down for viewing purposes, as Branagh wants it all to be seen. Post battle the effects of the fight are evident on the fighters as they look exhausted and their clothes are worn and muddy. Cuts and blood cover their visible skin and their faces have grim expressions of loss and anger. Sam Piercy 10 Gordon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    were better than the German planes, they notify the German mistakes and they also say that Hitler only wanted a peace treaty with the British not an invasion and that Hitler wanted to invade Russia (operation Barbarossa) The first interpretation that I will look at is a few extracts from

  2. The Battle of Britain

    It does mention however the Russian aspect and the entering of USA in the war that proved as a turning point. It is generally agreed that Britain alone could not win the war and bring a final defeat to Germany.

  1. The Crimean War.

    Cardigan mildly protested at the folly of charging such a position, however unwilling to disobey a direct order, Cardigan failed to make any attempt to verify whether Lord Raglan really wanted them to make such a suicidal effort. Cardigan sounded the charge and the Light Brigade started forward.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    The German fighters were also limited in that they could not reload their guns if they ran out of ammunition while over Kent or other areas. Our fighters could. Without sufficient fighter cover, the German bombers were very open to attack from British fighter planes and in battle the British

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    This was during the middle of the battle, when many pilots were practically sacrificing themselves. The basic message of this interpretation is that this Battle saved the world from Nazism ('Finest hour') and the young pilots won that battle, in which many perished ('The few').

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    Churchill is trying to boost morale by saying, "We will win" and "We will save the world from the Nazis" By saying this it makes the public feel confident that Britain would be victorious and also it makes the jobs of the Military especially the R.A.F.

  1. "With reference to the chosen sequence from the Gladiator, write an analysis which focuses ...

    Sound however is usually recorded together with the picture, in Spartacus the beat of the drum is recorded with picture of a man drumming it to motivate the gladiators. In the Gladiator, the sound of the heart beat is seen as coming from the mind of Russell Crowe within the story space.

  2. Consider the way in which Shakespeare presents Martius in the early part of the ...

    Here, the implication is that Martius is as proud as he is righteous. It is interesting to note here that every single epithet used to describe the acclaimed soldier so far in the scene has been derogatory. Another interesting insight provided by the mob in this section is that on Volumnia, who is Caius Martius' mother.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work