• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V In this essay I will be comparing the treatment of the Battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Brannagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. The Olivier version was made in 1945 nearing the end of the Second World War, it was deliberately made to give the British workers, those who had been left at home, and the members of the British army, a boost of moral and a taste of the glory that was in sight. Henry V was a good choice as battle, which, with the correct editing, could easily seem as if the British were fighting a just battle against the evil French. The film was created in a time where colour had been recently introduced into film so Olivier took full advantage of this by using the shiniest of breastplates and the most colourful of clothing on the British soldiers to make them look glorious. ...read more.

Middle

Realism is portrayed as scenes of looting and attacking in gangs against a single other fighter are shown. The scene in which the luggage boys are slaughtered is kept in both versions of the battle and they are directed fairly similarly, however, they are kept for different reasons. In the Olivier version this is showing that the French are treacherous and adds to the idea of the English trying to fight a just, fair battle against the evil French. On the other hand in the Branagh version the treachery of the French is just adding to the overall horror of battle. The King's speeches in the Branagh version are shot at eye level as he stands down with the men showing that he is leading the group from within but at the same time no better as a person than his men. The first factor I am going to discuss is realism contained in each of the films, in the Olivier version the bulk of the film appears rather unrealistic. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main objectives of this film is to show the real side of not only this period but of how battles have been and still are. There is no attempt to mislead the viewer in how green the grass of the battlefield is but it shows the battle as it most probably was. The first point is the state of the battlefield, which starts off reasonably muddy but throughout the duration of the battle, gets progressively worse. The mud is churned up by the hooves of the horses and begins to show on the characters, as it would. This compared to when the French walk through the mud in the Olivier version and stay immaculately clean is a vast improvement of material realism. The deaths are also of high detail and the gore is not toned down for viewing purposes, as Branagh wants it all to be seen. Post battle the effects of the fight are evident on the fighters as they look exhausted and their clothes are worn and muddy. Cuts and blood cover their visible skin and their faces have grim expressions of loss and anger. Sam Piercy 10 Gordon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    the editor would be biased towards Britain so facts that make the British Military look bad maybe left out. This article confirms the Battle of Britain myth, "A few young men" The paper encourages people to join in with the war effort.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Park and Dowding rejected this strategy as being too dangerous and argued it would increase the number of pilots being killed. From the outcome of the Battle of Britain it is obvious that their choice of tactics were correct. Therefore, these men played important roles in the British success.

  1. Consider the way in which Shakespeare presents Martius in the early part of the ...

    Volumnia speaks boastfully of how she, in effect, made her son the ruthless man he is today, through sending him to 'cruel war' as a 'tender-bodied' youth. This is certainly not typical maternal behaviour. Bearing in mind that she is the single body with most influence over Martius, it is important to observe here Volumnia's attitude to war.

  2. "With reference to the chosen sequence from the Gladiator, write an analysis which focuses ...

    It is shot from a medium height because it mirrors the height the gladiators would fight at again emphasising a sense of reality. The speed and order of the editing is very similar to the editing in a battle sequence from Lord Of The Rings, The Fellowship Of The Ring.

  1. The Crimean War.

    It was the most effective, and accurate weapon on the battlefield of Balaclava, and made a decisive mark against the Russians.30 Armouries used the Enfield rifle for the basic model of guns for almost sixty years afterwards. Although the Russians may have had more men, the British were far superior

  2. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    The French in this film may have represented the Germans in the war as the enemy. In the battle the enemy is shown as evil to make the audience feel they're doing the right thing fighting evil. Branagh's film was set many years later when society was more immune to shocking films and television programmes.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Britain's airspace was divided up into Groups. 10 Group defended Wales and the West Country and was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Sir Christopher Quintin Brand. 11 Group covered the southeast of England and the critical approaches to London and was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Keith Park.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    Her husband was a paratrooper captured by the Japanese, and was a prisoner of War in Japan. She was praying for his life and said that the young men who fought in the Battle of Britain were heroes, especially since many of them had returned from Dunkirk in a state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work