• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801 – 1921?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801 - 1921? In 1800 Catholics were persecuted under the Penal Laws they could not vote, sit in Parliament or hold public office this was unusual because this persecution affected 6/7 of the majority of the Island. Nationalist leaders set out to change status quo. Wolf Tone stated, "Ireland is for the Irish" through this nationalism was born. There are two predominate strands of Nationalism throughout this period in Irish history. Constitutional nationalism, which was to work within the British Parliamentary system in achieving an Irish self-governing body, which would deal with Irish domestic leaving Foreign affairs to Westminster known as Home Rule, leaders such as O' Connell, Parnell and Redmond are commonly known as constitutional nationalists. Republican Nationalists felt differently in methods in achieving Home Rule. Republicans felt that working within British politics would achieve nothing so Republicans turned to violence to achieve their aims such as Wolf Tone and the Patriots, Mitchell/Stephens and the Fenians, Collins/De Valera and the IRA all these Republican leaders setting up paramilitary organisations to achieve their aims however which strand of Nationalism proved to be more effective in achieving their cause? ...read more.

Middle

Unlike the first two bills, it was a well thought out piece of legislation. Parnell had achieved what O' Connell or any Republican movement before him i.e. Fenians and Young Irelanders had dreamed off. Parnell's had got Home Rule through Parliament however it was to be rejected by the House of Lords. Parnell had came to his peak he had achieved so much for the nationalist caused through the British parliamentary procedure however 1889 Parnell was found to having an affair with Kitty O Shea Gladstone and the Catholic church both condemn him, which ended his career he later dies in 1891. Parnell had achieved so much for the nationalist cause until 1888 he was considered a nationalist hero he had brought Home Rule to the brink however IPP was in ruins after his death until the leadership of Redmond. Constitutional Nationalists in the 19^th century were the main beneficiaries to Home Rule and the Nationalist Republicans although existed however never had a real voice or direction until the 20^th Century. A new strand of Nationalist had been discovered in Ireland, which was Cultural Nationalism this was forgetting about politics and concentrating on being on the Irish heritage. ...read more.

Conclusion

William Craig also at the negotiations wanted the whole Ireland to remain to Britain yet he negotiated 6 counties that were under direct control from Britain. The nationalist cause ignored the British parliamentary system from 1916 -1921 yet ironically it achieved Home Rule for 26 countries. The reality was no one got what they wanted. The nationalist cause advanced Sinn Fein and key figures such as Michael Collins and Eamon De Valera who were described by Lloyd George "trying to put up mercury with a fork". The history of the nationalist cause is a complex issue. The nationalist cause had been lead on two main fronts Constitutional Nationalism and Republican Nationalism yet with out one or the other I feel partition in 1921 would never of happened. The 19^th Century, seen Nationalist leaders working within the British parliamentary system, yet Nationalism under a new banner of Republicism now in the 20^th Century abandoned such methods seeking Home Rule. Parnell and Redmond had worked with the British parliamentary system and on both occasions were rejected by the House of Lords Ireland found that new extremes were needed. Nationalism is stages through out Ireland's history and through out each stage one man has developed the nationalist cause thus bringing it further to its fundamental goal, Home Rule. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    The National League was to replace the LL and become the electoral arm of the IPP, promoting HR. Violence did decrease, and support for Home Rule grew very rapidly - the NL was a very effective body. 1885 General Election - Parnell commits to the Conservatives Home Rule - he thought the C'ves were more likely to grant it.

  2. How far do these sources support the veiw that Irish Nationalism was a 'curious ...

    In evaluating the sources it is clear that they do not give a clear answer to the question. For example source 5 is a very powerful source in the sense that it clearly shows where the popular support was. However we are limited to the results of the elections between

  1. Did Daniel O' Connell deserve the name 'The Great Liberator'?

    His position of power increased furthermore, so that he was made a member of parliament as well as an Irish national leader. He even received �20 000 from Irish Catholics in recognition of his services to their cause, and with subsequent annual payments, they became known as 'the O'Connell Tribute'.

  2. Why is Daniel O'connell considered to be a great nationalist leader?

    He achieved this by winning a seat at County Clare in the 1828 election, during the campaign for which he used his superb use of the rhetoric to sway support from the forty-shilling freeholders. O'Connell had hardly taken on an easy seat to win, going up against the amiable and popular Vesey Fitzgerald and winning was a victory in itself.

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    The one thing that they had hoped was that Major would push things along so far that they could pick it up and go further with it. They didn't foresee that they were going to get such a magnificent, spectacular victory.

  2. the Irish question

    By giving help when it was needed, the British could have tried to win over the Irish people and make amends for the past. The British were the closest neighbours to Ireland and they would be the people most likely to be able to help.

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    A more significant disappointment for O'Connell was the repeal of union failure. In 1842 Charles Duffy and Thomas Davis founded the Nation, as the voice of a movement which becomes known as Young Ireland. Together the Young Ireland leaders and O'Connell organised mass demonstrations, which became known as monster meetings.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Moreover, although 1841-1843 saw his Monster Meetings raise the political temperature, it may be argued that he was less effective in the 1830s and 1840s because his party lacked discipline and he lost contact with more radical nationalists. Although J.C.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work