How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801-1921

Authors Avatar

How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801-1921?

Many Catholic and Irish nationalist leaders attempted to advance their cause in the years 1801-1921, but to what extent they were effective, was dependent on the methods they adopted. However, some Historians have argued that the Economic and Political situation within Ireland, for example the Famine in 1845 and continued changing public opinion dictated how effective each leader would be.

O’ Connell mobilised the Catholic Church, made them more politically aware, and gained mass support by setting up the Catholic association in 1823 and the introduction of the Catholic rent. Hoppen claims making the Catholic Church more politically aware was a huge success for the cause as it laid down a platform for the whole movement. In 1828 another success was achieved when O’Connell became an MP for county Clare even though he was a catholic which built upon the platform which had already been created therefore making this achievement seem more successful. Kee argued “The real victory consisted in the fact that the trodden Catholic masse had taken on the government and won”. A major success in 1829 was the Emancipation and many historians do believe it was passed due O’Connell being able to gain mass support making Peel’s government fear a mass uprising. Other Historians however believe Peel’s government feared a revolt from the rural classes which had been growing ever stronger since the late 1700’ with more groups emerging for the same cause, for example the Whiteboys. Unfortunately when the 1829 Catholic Relief Act was passed, the movement actually took a step backwards as the whole point was to allow more people to vote regardless of religion however the £10 fee meant even less people could vote than before, thus the electorate shrank dampening his earlier success. The Irish temporalities Act in 1831 got rid of ten Anglican Bishoprics in Ireland , but whether or not this can be seen as a real success for O’Connell is debatable, as it did not really advance the movement in any great way, but it revitalised the movement adding hope to it. A more significant disappointment for O’Connell was the repeal of union failure. In 1842 Charles Duffy and Thomas Davis founded the Nation, as the voice of a movement which becomes known as Young Ireland. Together the Young Ireland leaders and O'Connell organised mass demonstrations, which became known as monster meetings. A particularly large meeting was arranged in 1843 near Dublin at Clontarf which alarmed Peel’s government. O’ Connell decided to call it off and came under great criticism from Young Ireland for his conservatism.

Join now!

O’Connell therefore advanced his cause more effectively in the 1820’s with moderate successes adopting a conservative method which kick-started the whole movement. He was less successful in the 1930’s when he tried to bide his time with a reforming Whig administration and just as unsuccessful in the 1940’s with the failure of the repeal, however some historians have argued his monster meetings still took the movement a step further.

One Young Irelander who joined the Repeal Association in 1843 was Mitchell who then became a political leader writer for the Nation in 1845. The method he adopted to advance ...

This is a preview of the whole essay