• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer. Sources A, B and C are each accounts on the Battle of Dunkirk. Each of them are firsthand accounts, given by men from the British Navy who experienced the Battle of Dunkirk. They are useful, but due to particular reasons, their usefulness is also limited. Source A is, as are all the sources, a firsthand account. This means that it is automatically a useful source, as it was made by someone who was there at the time, and is therefore contemporary. In Source A, Commander Thomas Kerr, one of the naval officers sent to organise the evacuation, talks about the general state of the army, and the disarray it was in. What he says suggests that the soldiers he had came across had really had a blow to their spirit and morale. ...read more.


There is little doubt as to the motives behind the source, as it seems it was merely intended to inform someone of what the battle was like. It is also a fairly detailed source, which lots of vivid imagery and description. This gives a good understanding of the Battle of Dunkirk. However, as it is a firsthand source it comes with the limitations all firsthand sources have: only a single snapshot of what one person saw, and this makes it difficult to understand the Battle of Dunkirk as a whole. It is also another testament from someone in the Navy, and therefore it is again uncertain as to whether or not this source may be influenced by rivalry. It also fails to mention a number of aspects of the battle, such as the role of the RAF and of the French, and also lacks any sort of statistics of the battle. ...read more.


This makes it difficult to understand the Battle of Dunkirk in itself. As the three sources are only accounts from one group of people - the Navy - they cannot give the understanding that, for example, accounts from the air force, the army and the navy might give. There is also much content that is missing from the sources, such as background information and statistics. Also, as they are all naval accounts, they can only give understanding of what happened after the start of the evacuation. This makes it difficult to understand the actual Battle of Dunkirk. Overall, it seems the understanding that these sources offer of the Battle of Dunkirk is limited. Each of them lack the comprehensiveness and detailed information required to be able to fully understand the Battle of Dunkirk, such as background information, statistics and accounts from different perspectives. The fact that each account can only described what happened after the start of the evacuation makes it very difficult to understand the actual Battle of Dunkirk before the evacuation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Battle of Verdun.

    misleading and non-existent facts, despite the detail it goes into, that render it a weak source as an interpretation of the German attack on Verdun. Do Sources A to K prove that the strategy of attrition employed by the Germans at Verdun was an error of judgement?

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of ...

    This German quote supports Haig's opinion of the effect of the Somme on the troops in the German army. Other than reports from captured prisoners its unclear how he can have been sure of this at the time. Whilst he has not lied in the report, Haig might be seen

  1. Study Sources A & B. How far does A prove that Haig did not ...

    It is quite likely that Source B is a battle report of some kind, aimed to inform others of how the battle is progressing. "All went like clockwork" evokes the impression that nothing at the battle of the Somme (during the first few days)

  2. History Year 11 Dunkirk

    It only shows one scene, and straight after the photo was taken, something could have happened to change the meaning of this image. Overall, source B works alongside Taylor's statement. It is equal for both sides, in that it shows one aspect of which it could be seen as deliverance, and one of disaster.

  1. "Dad's Army" - How much can you learn from these sources about the work ...

    effort would not have harmed a "jeep" let alone a Panzer tank'. It was therefore improbable that the Home Guard could stop armoured vehicles. With their rifles later on, the Home Guard seemed more equipped to offer resistance. They had many rifles, as sources C and D show us.

  2. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    The top of the side facing the enemy is called parapet and the top of the other side is called parados and this is there all the sandbags are placed. The sandbags were filled with earth. A group called a filling party usually consisted of one soldier shovelling the earth and two guys holding and tying the bags up.

  1. With the Reference to the meetings between 1818-22, explain what you understand by the ...

    It suggested the great European powers co-operate to safeguard the stability and peace of Europe. This arrangement became known as The Congress System, because the powers worked through international congresses and also putting ideas of the European conerns into practice.

  2. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy. ...

    It is reliable because it was produced during the time; therefore it?s a primary source as a result it captures the feelings of a woman at the time of the war. It also tells us how women coped during the war, as well as that how the government organized propaganda on the home front.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work