• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer. Sources A, B and C are each accounts on the Battle of Dunkirk. Each of them are firsthand accounts, given by men from the British Navy who experienced the Battle of Dunkirk. They are useful, but due to particular reasons, their usefulness is also limited. Source A is, as are all the sources, a firsthand account. This means that it is automatically a useful source, as it was made by someone who was there at the time, and is therefore contemporary. In Source A, Commander Thomas Kerr, one of the naval officers sent to organise the evacuation, talks about the general state of the army, and the disarray it was in. What he says suggests that the soldiers he had came across had really had a blow to their spirit and morale. ...read more.


There is little doubt as to the motives behind the source, as it seems it was merely intended to inform someone of what the battle was like. It is also a fairly detailed source, which lots of vivid imagery and description. This gives a good understanding of the Battle of Dunkirk. However, as it is a firsthand source it comes with the limitations all firsthand sources have: only a single snapshot of what one person saw, and this makes it difficult to understand the Battle of Dunkirk as a whole. It is also another testament from someone in the Navy, and therefore it is again uncertain as to whether or not this source may be influenced by rivalry. It also fails to mention a number of aspects of the battle, such as the role of the RAF and of the French, and also lacks any sort of statistics of the battle. ...read more.


This makes it difficult to understand the Battle of Dunkirk in itself. As the three sources are only accounts from one group of people - the Navy - they cannot give the understanding that, for example, accounts from the air force, the army and the navy might give. There is also much content that is missing from the sources, such as background information and statistics. Also, as they are all naval accounts, they can only give understanding of what happened after the start of the evacuation. This makes it difficult to understand the actual Battle of Dunkirk. Overall, it seems the understanding that these sources offer of the Battle of Dunkirk is limited. Each of them lack the comprehensiveness and detailed information required to be able to fully understand the Battle of Dunkirk, such as background information, statistics and accounts from different perspectives. The fact that each account can only described what happened after the start of the evacuation makes it very difficult to understand the actual Battle of Dunkirk before the evacuation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    So some guys did come but how did they hide. So I asked my officer if I could walk on no-mans land and see if I was right. So I set of in camouflage gear and I climbed up a ladder, which was on he fire-step, and walked.

  2. The Battle of Verdun.

    One such Historian, the Italian Peter Toulini says this in his review of Mosier's 'The Myth of the Great War'- 'It cannot be said that this book charters or even discusses History, it is pure, unfiltered fiction, the work of a mad man' In conclusion, the source is based upon

  1. Study sources B and C. Which one of these sources do you trust more?

    If the battle was as he describes in this source then such an event would be hard to forget. Therefore the source, in terms of its author, should be viewed as reliable and good representation of the average soldier at the Somme's experiences.

  2. Study Sources A & B. How far does A prove that Haig did not ...

    It is quite likely that Source B is a battle report of some kind, aimed to inform others of how the battle is progressing. "All went like clockwork" evokes the impression that nothing at the battle of the Somme (during the first few days)

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of ...

    Because he wants to keep his job and be seen as a public hero rather than villain. However writing about the Somme in 1919 the German General Ludendorff wrote; 'We had heavy losses in men and material. As a result of the Somme we were completely exhausted on the western front.'

  2. History Year 11 Dunkirk

    It only shows one scene, and straight after the photo was taken, something could have happened to change the meaning of this image. Overall, source B works alongside Taylor's statement. It is equal for both sides, in that it shows one aspect of which it could be seen as deliverance, and one of disaster.

  1. "Dad's Army" - How much can you learn from these sources about the work ...

    However, despite this organisation we can see in source B that some actions served little purpose. For example, in source B the obstruction gang tried to delay German tanks but we know that this didn't happen because the author, who was a member of the gang himself, said; 'our best

  2. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy. ...

    As part of my own knowledge, I know that the newspapers and the journalists supported Britain and the government as they used censorship from the government?s power and made British soldiers more superior than the German?s. Source G also backs up this point because this source also makes people believe that British people are morally superior than Germans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work