• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 3162

I have chosen to look at the connection between, height, weight, intelligence quotient (IQ), hours of TV watched per week, and Key Stage 3 Sats results. I am hoping for a strong connection between either height and weight

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Statistics Coursework

 Introduction

I have chosen to look at the connection between, height, weight, intelligence quotient (IQ), hours of TV watched per week, and Key Stage 3 Sats results. I am hoping for a strong connection between either height and weight and weight and IQ. I have chosen these because I think it will be interesting to see if the amount of TV watched does affect your weight because of being inactive for long periods of time. Also I would like to find out if people with higher IQ’s don’t watch as much TV as people with lower IQ’s.

 Aim

My aim will be to investigate the following statements:-

  1. Year 11 students are heavier and taller than Year 10 students
  2. The higher the intelligence quotient (IQ) the higher the Key Stage 3 Sats Results.
  3. The more hours of TV watched per week, the lower the intelligence quotient (IQ).
  4. The more hours of TV watched per week, the more the student weights.

 Hypothesis

  1. I expect that the investigation of year 11 students being heavier and taller than year 10 students because as year 11 students are older meaning they would have started puberty before year 10 students making them taller and heavier.
  2. I expect that the investigation of the higher the intelligence quotient (IQ)
...read more.

Middle

1.52

38

11

Dawson

1.7

50

11

Downey

1.68

50

11

Fisher

1.8

72

11

Flawn

1.62

51

11

Francis

1.58

54

11

Friend

1.73

60

11

Frost

1.85

73

11

Hollingworth

1.55

50

11

Hope

1.96

93

11

Hunter

1.52

44

11

Hussain

1.82

52

11

Jackson

1.68

50

11

Jaesie

1.74

50

11

Johnson

1.69

65

11

Lee

1.83

75

11

Lewis

1.56

45

11

Madalin

1.62

92

11

Marice

1.71

54

11

McFadden

1.7

60

11

Neeley

1.68

47

11

Nolan

1.84

78

11

O'Donall

1.33

55

11

Olderson

1.62

48

11

Perfains

1.76

62

11

Raphiell

1.55

50

11

Rees

1.5

45

11

Shimperd

1.52

44

11

Smith

1.69

42

11

Warne

1.84

76

Hypothesis 2, 3 & 4

Surname

TV/Week

IQ

(kg)

En

Ma

Sc

Aberdeen

14

103

45

4

5

4

Anderson

26

116

60

5

5

5

Ashiq

26

95

56

4

4

4

Askabat

10

105

57

4

4

5

Barlow

30

102

44

5

4

4

Barlow

30

102

44

5

4

4

Berry

48

100

64

4

4

4

Blashaw

70

116

51

5

4

5

Bradbury

20

91

51

4

3

3

Burges

7

98

45

4

4

4

Butt

36

103

54

4

4

4

Campell

20

96

55

4

3

4

Carmicheal

15

78

60

3

3

3

Chayse

2

113

52

5

4

4

Chinny

7

112

56

3

4

4

Chung

16

109

56

5

5

5

Connerly

25

94

48

2

4

4

Cunning

21

107

40

5

5

5

Doens

16

101

72

4

4

4

Fairfax

14

106

51

5

5

5

Fasworth

45

96

72

4

3

4

Gorst

15

91

50

3

3

4

...read more.

Conclusion

Evaluation

In order to make this investigation more accurate and reliable I could have used a much bigger sample. Although this would involve a lot more time being spent and more calculations, the accuracy of the investigation would be much better and this may show and even stronger correlation and even proven my entire hypothesis correct. However, I have only looked at a sample of the data, the sample was taken randomly and I have not been bias at any time throughout the investigation so I do believe that my conclusion is correct and that there is a strong correlation between height and weight of pupils in year 10 and in year 11 and between the IQ and Average Sats Scores.

I could also carry on the investigations by going into the genders by investigating that year 11 boys are taller and heavier than year 10 boys.

Overall as a conclusion I have fulfilled 50% of my aim and have done so fairly with relatively accurate results, overall the investigation was quite successful.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Height and Weight of Pupils

    Kavangh Jonna Female 1.60 48 As you can see there is a positive correlation for all of the females. All Students As you can see there is a positive correlation for all of the students. Hypothesis 1 * Year 8 females will be taller and heavier than year 8 males.

  2. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

    65 70?w<80 0 75 0 TOTAL 20 895 Mean = 895 divided by 20 = 44.75 rounded off to 45 kg for GIRLS Mean of Boys and Girls Height BOYS Height (cm) Tally Frequency Mid-point Fx 130?h<140 II 2 135 270 140?h<150 0 145 0 150?h<160 IIIIII 6 155 930

  1. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    I drew a line of best fit to show me this correlation. There are a few anomalies in the graph, however the two mean lines for the height and weight indicates me the average point of both variables. Most of the points are clustered in that area which tells me that most of the points is around that mean average.

  2. Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

    The method I have selected is the second, the use of IQR to show outliers, this is because method 1 (using standard deviation) means that you have to assume the data is normally distributed, which until I prove my third hypotheses I cannot be certain of so IQR is the best option for me.

  1. Investigation on the shape and size of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore called ...

    So from this preliminary work I know 11 is the minimum sample size I need to take. However I chose 25 samples because I am investigating limpets which are different specie to rough periwinkles and so there would be a difference in sample size.

  2. What affects a persons ability to estimate?

    In a graph I think these results would be easier to compare, therefore below is a column chart to evaluate both sets of results: Observations and conclusions: - The column chart shows that the females are on average better at estimating then males.

  1. Liquid chromatography is a technique used to separate components of a mixture to isolate ...

    Efficiency (plates/m) Efficiency (%) Symmetry ?10%? height Standard 0.316 -0.50 6.55 21940 66.5 0.67 1 in 5 0.0632 -1.20 6.52 31166 94.4 0.55 1 in 10 0.03158 -1.50 6.47 33554 101.6 0.69 1 in 20 0.01579 -1.80 6.45 33447 101.3 0.72 1 in 30 0.01053 -2.00 6.43 35486 107.5 0.70 1 in 50 0.00632 -2.20 6.43

  2. I am going to find out the year 10 male average student at Weavers ...

    P.T.O Hypothesis 3 My hypothesis: I think most students in 2009 will be 60kg as I am 50kg and most students are heavier than me. I think students in 1996 will weigh less than 60 kg as they are less tall therefore weigh less 2009 Mean (before finding outliers)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work