• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26

Trolley Speed

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Factors affecting the speed of a trolleycoae ae" . "r se" . ae . "ae" . "w or". ae . " " . ae . "k inae foae " . ae . ".

Travelling down a ramp

Factors such as; type of surface of ramp, height of ramp, weight/mass of trolley and the gradient or angle of a ramp all affect the speed of a trolley as it travels down a ramp. For instance a trolley may accelerate faster down a ramp on smooth wood rather than on carpet because carpet might provide greater friction for the tyres rather than the smooth wood. Out of all these factors, I am going to pick just 1 factor and alter it 5 different times, doing 3 trials for each time. We have also done some preliminary work on ticker - timers, so in my investigation I am going to expand on the notion of ticker - timers and incorporate my knowledge of ticker - timers in to this investigation.

Aim: To investigate the relationship between the speed of the trolley as it travels down the ramp and the gradient of the ramp.coed ed" . "r se" . ed . "ed" . "w or". ed . " " . ed . "k ined foed " . ed . ":

Hypothesis: I believe that the speed of the trolley travelling down the ramp will increase as the gradient of the ramp is increased. This is because of several different factors.

One of these factors is Potential energy. Potential energy is stored energy possessed by a system as a result of the relative positions of the components of that particular system. In this case, it is a trolley that is held at the top of the ramp, which is above the ground; the trolley and the earth possess a certain amount of potential energy. In this experiment we are focusing on a particular type of potential energy, gravitational energy.

...read more.

Middle

1. After each experiment we cleaned the ramp with a cloth, to make sure that there was

no dirt which could affect the speed of the trolley as it travelled down the ramp.

2. Before we let go off the trolley, I held the ramp so that it would not tilt and therefore

it would not interfere with the speed of the trolley as it travelled down the ramp.

These above factors will also give me more accurate and reliable results. People consider accurate and reliable results as the same kind of result but it is not. Accurate results are results, which are right or correct results. A reliable result means, every time you carry out the experiment they are almost identical results. For example a normal weighing scale might give you reliable results, which gives you the same results each time you do the experiment but they are not as accurate as if you measure with a digital scale. I believe that my results are reliable but not accurate because we had limited resources to carry out the experiment with. Looking at my results they do follow a pattern and a trend. Both the potential and kinetic energy go up as the height increase but more potential than kinetic. The acceleration of the trolley is more than the speed of the trolley and both the kinetic energy and acceleration graphs are almost identical. I have no anomalous results but two inaccurate results, which do not fit in with the rest of the attempts at the same heights. This may have happened because the person timing the trolley may have pressed the digital stopwatch's stop button too late.

...read more.

Conclusion

Height (cm)

Reading 1

Reading 2

Reading 3

Average

Average Speed (cm/s)

12

1.011

1.078

1.007

1.032

67.83

14

0.913

0.905

0.936

0.918

76.25

16

0.818

0.847

0.835

0.833

84.00

            I feel that overall the results were quite accurate. This is can be seen when looking at the graphs, which show a straight line with all of the points apart from one or a few being very close to or on that line.

            The reasons for these few inaccurate results may have been as followed:

The trolley may have been pushed slightly at the beginning therefore giving it an advantage.

The apparatus might not have been set up correctly meaning that results could have been abnormal.

The height of the trolley might not have been measured correctly and therefore, with a greater height, the trolley would have gone faster with a lower time.

            As there were only three anomalies, I can say that the results obtained are reliable to the extent that a clear conclusion can be made from them. I believe that the results obtained do strongly support my conclusion and that further results do not need to be taken apart from the three anomalies which should be repeated.

Further work:

            In addition to the experiment, further work does not need to be done. However to obtain more evidence to support my predictions and possibly to make another prediction, I would also vary another variable. The variable I would choose to vary would add a weight to the trolley pulling it down the ramp. This would speed it up and I would vary the amount of weights. To obtain good results I would drop the weight down onto the floor from a string attached to the trolley with the help of a pulley. With more weights, I would predict that the trolley would go faster down the slope and therefore there would be a lower time.

suhura. Thus, we can say that whilst this represents a progression, in the end we have come no closer to any "real" knowledge.

this coursework was downloaded from Coursework.info. Redistribution prohib

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. How the height of a ramp affects the speed of a toy car.

    10 x 0.050 0.025 0.068 0.05 x 10 x 0.068 0.034 0.085 0.05 x 10 x 0.085 0.0425 From my results I can use the nth term to try to find the relationships between the speed, I can then work out a formula: height 1.7 3.5 5 6.8 8.5 speed

  2. What affects the acceleration of a trolley down a ramp?

    When the object is about to hit the ground, all its potential energy will be converted into kinetic energy. Provided the distance fallen is not too large and the mass of the object not too small the effect of air resistance can be ignored.

  1. Investigate and measure the speed of a ball rolling down a ramp.

    Graph number three, shows how the G.P.E is affected by the height of the ramp in centimeters. And the graph shows a positive gradient of 0.23J/cm this means that every centimeter you increase on the ramp that I'm using the gravitational potential energy increases too by 0.23 joules.

  2. Investigation is to see how changing the height of a ramp affects the stopping ...

    To conclude my first graph basically shows me that as I increase the height of the ramp, the stopping distance for the car also increases. My graph is an upwards curve through the origin, telling me that the stopping distance of the car is directly proportional to the height of the ramp.

  1. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The trolley was placed at the top of the runway and released when the ticker timer was started. 4. The ticker timer was stopped when the trolley was stopped at the end of the flat ramp. 5. The tape was removed and measured from the start of the regular

  2. How does the weight of an object affect the friction it has on the ...

    At this point, friction is said to be limiting. It can be shown experimentally that Fmax is proportional to R (downward force, or weight), fmax=?R The constant of proportionality, which is always given as the symbol "�", is called the coefficient of friction.

  1. An investigation into factors that effect the braking distance of a trolley

    The continuous force, - (how much the object is pushed), the bigger the push or force, the bigger the acceleration. The gradient of the slope, - (the height of the slope that the object moves down), the bigger the gradient, the bigger the acceleration will be as the object travels

  2. An investigation into the acceleration of a trolley up a ramp.

    Therefore altering the mass would directly affect the product and an increase in mass would result in a higher product. This is also the case the other way round. For example; if m=0.5kg; g=10N/Kg and h=0.2 then PE=1J But if m= 0.8kg and the others remain constant then PE=1.6J Kinetic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work