• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did questionable leadership actions involving the Battle of Gettysburg ultimately decide the outcome of the battle and possibly the Civil War?

Extracts from this document...


How did questionable leadership actions involving the Battle of Gettysburg ultimately decide the outcome of the battle and possibly the Civil War? A. Plan of Investigation The Investigation measures the questionable aspects of leadership in the Battle of Gettysburg, and how the actions by both Union and Confederate leaders ultimately led to the outcome of the battle, and possibly the civil war. The investigation evaluates the causes and effects of actions taken leading up to, and during the Battle of Gettysburg, by Confederate General Robert E. Lee and by Union by General Daniel E. Sickles, as well as Abraham Lincoln. Sources such as "Gettysburg: The Souvenir Guide to the National Military Park" are studied, and their origins, purposes, values, and limitations are measured and assessed along with the other sources used for this investigation. B. Summary of Evidence Before the Battle of Gettysburg, the secession of the south, and Abraham Lincoln being elected as President of the United States, the tensions between the northern and southern states had been continuously growing for years. Arguably since the annexation of Texas, tensions began rising, but after the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 the possibility of a major conflict started becoming more likely. ...read more.


Lee demanding General Longstreet to send Pickett and his division straight into the center of the union defense, through a mile of open field on the third day of battle, marked the end for the Lee at Gettysburg. Pickett's division was dismantled and destroyed as they marched the battlefield, the few remaining survivors returned to Lee's position. Upon return General Lee asked Pickett to rally his division, and Pickett returned with the famous quote "General Lee, I have no division." C. Evaluation of Sources Gettysburg: The Souvenir Guide to the National Military Park is a 72 page account of the Battle of Gettysburg by James A. Gross and Andre B. Collins. The purpose of this guide is to accompany a visitor to the national park as they walk the fields of battle, and follows the battle in-depth in every aspect. The book has miniature biographies of Major Generals involved in the battle along with Abraham Lincoln. Also it gives a descriptive and illustrated battlefield tour, along with 20 different maps of Gettysburg over the three day span of the war. The maps illustrate the different positions of the Union and Confederate troops from the advancement of Lee's Army to the retreat, and the three days of battle in-between. ...read more.


The Battle of Gettysburg ended after three days in the Union's favor in large part due to Sickle's risky decision, and Lee sending his troops into a deathtrap. Of course the Battle of Gettysburg might not have occurred had it not been for the effects of the Emancipation Proclamation, because General Lee might not have needed to make a stand in the north if he had the support of foreign allies. Due to Lincoln though foreign aid backed away from the Confederacy and they were left weak. E. Conclusion Without the actions of Daniel E. Sickles and Robert E. Lee at Gettysburg the battle could have ended in a different manner. If the south had won the battle they would have gained a stronghold in the north and the outcome of the Civil War could be different. The Battle of Gettysburg is arguably the most pivotal turning point in the Civil War. Although the battle was nearly two years before the war officially ended, after the battle the Confederate army began retreating to the south. They never recovered from the losses in the north, and eventually the Confederate States of America officially lost the war and rejoined the Union as the United States of America. F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures ...

    The North was morally opposed to the idea that one person could "own" another. Abolitionists in the North wrote books, published newspapers spreading their ideas about slavery, and often assisted slaves to freedom when they ran away from their masters.

  2. Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War

    Summation of the evidence presented by Professor Davis a. Slavery: The South had an economy based on agriculture by means of slave labor. On the other hand, the North had an industrial economy that depended on the working class for their success as they found slavery illegal (Economics and the Civil War).

  1. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    It was clear that the army, for now, was loyal to the government. As for the Basque region, which mostly encompassed monarchists, it became more republican to achieve more autonomy. However, even by 1933 the Basque could not have autonomy.

  2. Operation Barbarossa was the leading military operation in World War II, yet it failed ...

    This version of the book is useful as Murphy consulted Hitler for the precise significance and English translation. It is heavily prejudiced towards Nazi views because Murphy was an official propagandist on behalf of them. In the beginning he claims that Hitler was under "emotional stress" when writing Mein Kampf13.

  1. Notes on the Causes of the American Civil War

    In 1836- Texas won independence from Mexico 4. Yet Northerners opposed annexation as it would strengthen the political power of the South 5. Both President Jackson and Van Burn shelved the issue of Texas. 6. Texas was an independent Republic 7.

  2. Analyse the causes of the Spanish Civil War

    Gil Robles, including Mola and Franco, supported it. The assassination of a popular CEDA leader in July 1936 was the catalyst for the coup. Indeed Azana tried to prevent the coup by moving key military figures. The coup was organized at the 18th of July, but when the details were discovered it was moved to the 17th.

  1. Mao and China Revision Guide

    Confucianism had also represented all that was wrong with the old Chinese ways and ?Confucius and Co? became a standard term of abuse directed at any individual or group that seemed to follow the old ways. The most basic fear of the PRC was that religion with the help of

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - No Palestinian Arab state had emerged after 1949. - Palestinian historians assert this was because Israel, supported by Western powers, prevented it. They claim that the British destroyed local Arab leadership through hostility and duplicity to the Arabs and complicity with the Zionists, therefore enabling the Zionists to expel the Palestinians from their own country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work