• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bouncing balls. Research question: What is the relation between the height from which the ball falls and the time in which the ball bounces? How is the time dependent on the height?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Gracja Kowalska kl. 2 IB

BOUNCING BALLS

Research question:

What is the relation between the height from which the ball falls and the time in which the ball bounces? How is the time dependent on the height?

Variables:

INDEPENDENT

DEPENDENT

CONTROLLED

Height from which the balls are let freely

Time in which the balls make 6 bounces

Mass of each ball

Surface on which the experiment is carried

Amount of 6 bounces

Value of gravitation

Apparatus:

  • 2 table tennis balls of different mass
  • stopwatch [±0.05 s]
  • measuring tape [±0.05 cm]
  • 2 different surfaces

image00.png

Sketch: The way experiment was carried

Method:

  1. 7 different heights (45-130 cm) were established using measuring ruler
  2. 2 balls of different mass were picked
  3. starting with the lowest height. the ball was let freely
  4. the time during which ball bounced 6 times was measured and recorded using stopwatch
  5. the experiment was repeated 3 times for each height
  6. the same experiment was carried out with another ball

DCP:

I divided this experiment into 2 phases: the first one, original, was using floor as the surface on which the experiment was carried. The second phase was invented to reduce the uncertainties and make the experiment more reliable, precise and accurate.

For the first phase of the experiment.

...read more.

Middle

3.22

3.15

3.23

130.00

3.59

3.59

3.53

3.28

3.30

3.31

rounded to 2 decimal place

Again, the mean was calculated using given equation.

mean= image01.pngimage02.png

Table 4: Measurements of time it takes for a ball to bounce 6 times on the table

Height [±0.05 cm]

Time [±0.05 s]

Pioneer

Dante

40.00

2.35

2.20

55.00

2.60

2.53

70.00

2.91

2.72

85.00

3.12

2.90

100.00

3.27

3.01

115.00

3.46

3.20

130.00

3.57

3.30

rounded to 2 decimal place

Having all measurements done. I decided to put them in one table to discuss the observations more easily.

Table 5: Measurements for both phases of experiment.

Height [±0.05 cm]

Time [±0.05 s]

Pioneer

Dante

floor

table

floor

table

40.00

2.29

2.35

2.19

2.20

55.00

2.59

2.60

2.54

2.53

70.00

2.97

2.91

2.78

2.72

85.00

3.24

3.12

2.96

2.90

100.00

3.38

3.27

3.17

3.01

115.00

3.58

3.46

3.24

3.20

130.00

3.70

3.57

3.36

3.30

Rounded to 2 decimal place

Considering the values of measurements from the table above, I can say that there is a significant differences between Pioneer ball and Dante. As the Pioneer took more time to bounce 6 times, I can deduce that the ball blew higher and therefore was lighter than the Dante ball, which needed less time to bounce and therefore I can say that it had bigger weight. Also, considering the difference between the measurements of the same ball but on different surfaces, I assumed that since the ball needs less time to bounce on the floor, it means the floor is more stiff and therefore more adequate and suitable for experiment. What is more, I couldn't deduce it without the other surface to compare the measurements.

Also, I calculated the uncertainities for each measurement using the equation

Uncertainity=image03.png

Table 6: Uncertainities for both phases of experiment.

Height [±0.050 cm]

Time uncertainities

Pioneer

Dante

floor

table

floor

table

40.00 0

0.010

0.015

0.035

0.025

55.00 0

0.050

0.015

0.015

0.005

70.00 0

0.010

0.010

0.005

0.010

85.00 0

0.050

0.030

0.025

0.025

100.00 0

0.020

0.030

0.010

0.045

115.00 0

0.035

0.015

0.035

0.040

130.00 0

0.020

0.030

0.015

0.015

Rounded to 3 decimal place

...read more.

Conclusion

  • different types of balls, as each ball have different properties
  • different types of surface, as again, each have different properties
  • time of human reaction [about 0.15 s]
  • the uncertainty of measuring tape [±0.05 cm]
  • the uncertainty of a stopwatch [±0.05 s]
  • the initial velocity of ball could have been other than intentional 0 ms-1
  • the height from which the balls were let free could be imprecise
  • air friction and friction forces could also affect the time of the measurement
  • the uneven loss of energy of the balls during bounces also affected the experiment
  • the bounces were uneven, depending mostly on the surface on which the experiment was taken

Some improvements could be made to make the experiment more reliable and to limit the influence of the uncertainities on the measurements:

  • dropped the balls from higher level, so that the uncertainties of time are less significant and the measurements were easier to take
  • made more measurements - this would lead to more accurate graphs
  • use better stopwatch, reducing the uncertainty of time
  • make sure the intitial velocity of balls are equal to zero, f.e. using starting block
  • measure the time for one bounce and calculate from the equation of free fall
  • use more balls of different type, to get more reliable results
  • use more precise equipment like Vernier to have the measurements of velocity

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Physics IA bouncing ball

    Grab the rubber ball and place it with one hand besides the 10cm mark in the ruler. 4. With the other hand have the chronometer in 0 seconds and be ready because as you are going to release the ball you have to start the count in the chronometer.

  2. Period of a loaded Cantilever (D, DCP, CE)

    This may lead to uncertainties to the mass and shift the best-fit curve slightly to the left. The mass of the tapes is not significant in comparison to the masses loaded and cannot cause a large uncertainty to the results.

  1. Physics-investigate the relationship of temperature and the height of the bounce of a squash ...

    height at which the ball has 0 kinetic energy, a digital camera will be used to record the bounce of the ball and then played back in slow motion to identify the height of the bounce of the ball. Controls: Height from which Ball is dropped A meter stick will

  2. In this extended essay, I will be investigating projectile motion via studying the movement ...

    In this experiment, the projection height y and the compressed length x are varied separately and the projection range is determined. First of all, the spring constant of the spring is measured and the experiment is carried out on the elevating platform with a hole filling with sand and the

  1. Research question: Part A : What is the static friction coefficient of ...

    Through out the experiment, the angle of the elevation is fixed at 30. Determination of the acceleration of the block; e.g Surface; wood / wood initial velocity, u = = cms-1 final velocity, v = = cms-1 acceleration, a = = = 2.11 cms-1 Surface Initial velocity, ms-1 Final velocity,

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    The experimental wavelength corresponded to de Broglie?s calculated wavelength. KE = eV. KE = .5mv2=p2/2m Outline a laboratory procedure for producing and observing atomic spectra: Matter emits light when heated to high temperatures or exposed to high electric fields. This light can be split into its component wavelengths if put through a spectrometer.

  1. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

    line which means that the value of 1.11 m s-2 isn?t an incorrect value, leaving room for a possible systematic error. The results seem reasonable taken into account that the values measured were all relatively small, which can give a wider set of results.

  2. Investigating optical properties of Jelly.

    Making sure no parallax error was caused, the fourth pin was put down on the opposite side of the Jelly making sure that it too lined up perfectly with the three pins on the other side. The same was repeated with the fifth and the sixth pin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work