• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish civil war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Friday, 21st May 2004 The Spanish Civil War To what extent did foreign intervention influenced the outcome of the Spanish civil war? The foreign intervention influenced the outcome of the Spanish civil war to some extent, as it altered the course of war as the majority of the European powers tacitly supported the Fascist right, leaded by Franco. This is because most of the European right countries, if not all, disliked the idea of communism spreading all over the continent. Hence, despite the agreement of the non-intervention committee of 1936, Germany and Italy strongly supported Franco sending him extra artillery, new weaponry and more soldiers. However, these help was not only sent to prevent the spread of communism, but to test the new weapons made as the civil war was seen as a 'dress rehearsal' for the Second World War. Moreover, Mussolini and Hitler thought Franco could be a powerful ally during the Second World War and thus supported his raise to power. On the other hand, the result of this event cannot be solely blamed in the international intervention and aid, as it was not the only factor that affected the result of the civil war. According to Martin Blinkhorn, "the betrayal of the Republic by its supposed fellow democracies" due to the great disunity the left had to deal with, plus the "farce of non-intervention" gave a clear advantage to the nationalists. Moreover, factors like distribution, mobilization and human resources also helped to determine the result of the civil war. Furthermore, according to Stephen Lee, the "cohesion of the Nationalists", the "superior military structure and organization" due to their systematic method and the policies adopted by Baldwin and Chamberlain, together with the strong support of the Roman Catholic church and the " decisive factors" as Blinkhorn maintains, of "preparation, timing, audacity and luck" gave the victory to right fascist leader; Franco. ...read more.

Middle

The purpose of the pact was to contain the war within Spain by prohibiting the member nations from supplying materials of war to either side of the conflict (Werstein 152). Since Britain was the only country to abide by the agreement, the Non-Intervention Pact was completely ineffective. It would eventually harm the republic drastically because Britain and France, for the most part, followed the agreement while Germany and Italy completely ignored it Great Britain remained neutral for many of the same reasons as the United States. Britain, too, was in the midst of an economic crisis under conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin and therefore most of the British people wanted to focus on the problems of their own nation (Werstein 137). Several British companies owned interests in Spain. The British Rio Tinto Company owned vast copper deposits in Spain which could be jeopardized in the event of a communist takeover (Werstein 136). World War I was scarcely twenty years old and most Britons wanted to avoid another war. To achieve this, Britain signed the Non-Intervention Pact on August 2, 1936. Introduced by France, it was signed by the five major European Nations of Britain, France, Russia, Germany, and Italy (Werstein 152). The purpose of the pact was to contain the war within Spain by prohibiting the member nations from supplying materials of war to either side of the conflict (Werstein 152). Since Britain was the only country to abide by the agreement, the Non-Intervention Pact was completely ineffective. It would eventually harm the republic drastically because Britain and France, for the most part, followed the agreement while Germany and Italy completely ignored it. The main British support for the republic came from Clement Attlee, leader and spokesman of the Labour Party (Werstein 137). He was joined by British liberals, leftists, trade unions, and labourites (Werstein 137). The main opposition came from Anthony Eden, the British Foreign Minister. ...read more.

Conclusion

"And for all their spirit, for all their courage, it was foreign help that decided the outcome. That supplied by Germany and Italy was more powerful, and the nationalists accordingly won the war..." (McKendrick 201). The Non-Intervention Committee was a sham, "Not a man on the committee was unaware that Germany, Italy and, later, the Soviet Union were consistently violating the agreement. Since Nazi and Fascist contributions to the Rebels outweighed those of the Soviet Union to the Loyalists, the Nonintervention Committee succeeded only in assuring the death of the Spanish Republic" (Werstein 154). Republican soldier Timoteo Ruiz, after crossing the border into France and witnessing the train loads of held up supplies, commented, "If we had realized from the start that we were alone-even opposed to the bourgeois democracies which were boycotting us- it would have become a popular, revolutionary war..." (Fraser 328). Fraser, Ronald. Blood of Spain: An Oral History of the Spanish Civil War. New York: Pantheon, 1979. McKendrick, Melveena. The Horizon Concise History of Spain. New York: American Heritage, 1972. Tinker, Jr., F. G. "The Italian Debacle at Guadalajara." Men at War. Ed. Ernest Hemingway. New York: Bramhall House, 1979. Werstein, Irving. The Cruel Years: the Story of the Spanish Civil War. New York: Julian Messner, 1969. * According to Hitler "without the help of both countries there would be today no Franco." * Italy: * 50,000 ground troops * 950 tanks * 763 aircraft * 91 warships * Germany: * 16,000 military advisers * The latest aircraft * Services of the Condor Legion. * This helped in three main occasions: * When transporting Franco's troops from Morocco into southern Spain in German and Italian aircraft. o Enable conquest of Andalusia. * Boost to Nationalists morale by an increase in the Italian equipment. * A massive flow of armaments in 1939, which let Franco crush Catalonia. o Multinationals * Texaco, Shell, the Texas Oil Company and the Atlantic Refining Company were some multinational companies which contributed with the success of Franco. "Without oil, the Generalissimo's war machines would have ground to a halt." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. The Re-Unification Of Germany.

    Less than a year later, their goal was achieved. Attitudes and Strategies of the Four Powers The first unification of Germany took place in 1871 and had been the result of conflict (with France) and as such, it seemed to some that a unified Germany was inherently dangerous.

  2. Account for the varying fates of the Jewish populations in different Balkan countries during ...

    war, the Romanian government altered its Jewish policy to fit with that of the winning side. The highest percentage of Balkan Jews died in Greece and Yugoslavia, the two Balkan states where Germany's dominance was strongest, in contrast Bulgaria with the greatest independence from the Nazis resulted in the lowest

  1. Why did the Labour Party win the General Election of 1945?

    Much of the discussion and the pamphlets distributed were about nationalisation, post-war reconstruction and the reform like the Beveridge Report. The Economist described the meetings as providing 'opportunities for soldiers to discuss the problems in which they as citizens of a democratic country will have an important stake when the

  2. What were the Main Features of the Stalinist System

    used to his advantage to coerce people into conformity, "for the soviet people it meant almost half a century of fear, suspicion, ignorance of their past and the outside world, and a fatalistic submissiveness to the totalitarian system."14 The most horrific consequence of the tyrannical Stalinist system and the terror

  1. Can Franco be described as a truly fascist dictator?

    The main themes which will be assessed are Franco's rise to power, Franco's style of rule, Franco's social policy, Franco's economic policy and Franco's foreign policy. Firstly it is important to assess General Franco's rise to power. Franco gained power through victory in the Spanish Civil War of 1936 to 1939.

  2. Within the context 1814 1939, to what extent could the Wall Street Crash ...

    be considered invalid as Hitler?s rise to power is a result of the Great Depression and therefore is an absolute direct cause. Rothermund even says himself ?Hitler?s claim to fame as the man who overcame the depression in Germany?[8], his view is therefore contradictory.

  1. The Rape of Nanking and its Aftermath: How a Genocidal Event Shaped Sino-Japanese Relations ...

    that provide ?comprehensive coverage of Japanese war crimes, with figures of fatalities, gruesome pictures, and even names of villages and individuals that had fallen victim to the aggression.?[21] The Chinese have also built museums, most notably the one in Nanking, that are sites for patriotic education and for documenting the

  2. STALIN, SOVIET POLICY, AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF A COMMUNIST BLOC IN EASTERN EUROPE, 1944-1953

    France.7 The situation in Eastern Europe took a sharp turn for the worse in August 1939, when the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany signed a Non-Aggression Pact and soon thereafter concluded a secret protocol to the Pact. Under the terms of the secret protocol, the two signatories divided Eastern Europe

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work