• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who were the winners from the interdict dispute of 1206-1214, and who were the losers?

Extracts from this document...


Who were the winners from the interdict dispute of 1206-1214, and who were the losers? A papal interdiction was placed on England in 1208, this was due to the frictions between the papacy held by Pope Innocent III and the King of England, John. The issue stemmed from the death of the Archbishop of Canterbury Hubert Walter in July 1205. It began with the Popes rejection of both the English King's choice of replacement John De Gray, who was the bishop of Norwich at the time of Hubert's death, and also the English bishops ideal candidate for the role, Reginald when they went to Rome for approval. Pope Innocent instead chose to elect Stephen Langton to the role of Archbishop of Canterbury. This incident gave a prime example of how "Pope Innocent III was clearly convinced of his right to decide essentially political issues1". Langton's appointment was refused by King John and customarily he had every right to dispute such an election, as previously the Leader of England had made the decision rather than the Pope. This led to the imposition of an interdict being placed upon England in March 1208. An interdict from an spiritual point of view is "to cut off authoritatively from certain ecclesiastical functions and privileges"2. ...read more.


There is a essential issue that the resolution of the interdict dispute, that spanned from 1206 until 1213, resolved. The problem not only reflected favourably on the English King and his ability to make the most of a difficult situation, but also highlighted Pope Innocent's political prowess. The issue being considered is the declaration by the French King Philip of the imminent invasion of England on the 8th of April 1213.7 The invasion was endorsed by Stephen Langton. It was not however directly approved by Pope Innocent, however Langton's support suggests it would be if the invasion had been acted upon. This threat of attack forced John's hand to wave the white flag and offer his kingdom to the papacy. This resulted in the reinstatement of Stephen Langton as the Archbishop of Canterbury, which can certainly be counted as a success for him personally and his representation of the Church in England. This must also be considered a success for John as his Kingdom was not ceased by the French and he had inherited Innocent as his "uncritical protector8". Not only is this event extremely important due to the reasons stated above it can also be considered to be a major catalyst in ending the papal interdict and John's excommunication. ...read more.


It can be compared with any battle the fact that John surrender to Pope Innocents demands ultimately suggest he lost the overall dispute. The main factor that exemplifies this is the signing of the treaty of 1213 which was integral in the battle for power as it offered Innocent a chance to expand his Roman catholic kingdom and also accept King John as his liegeman. But as in any defeat there must be a benefit for the loser in order for them to wave the white flag. On this occasion John gained an exemplary Archbishop of Canterbury, profited from the money he had taken from the exiled churchmen and most important gained an extremely valuable ally that would protect England from invasion, and its monarchy from power sapping reforms. It must also be noted that as the quotation from Moore stated above John was probably wining the battle until France became involved. Innocent however was clearly the more calculating tactician and managed to get every thing he had desired before the interdict had begun. The victory of the church is also evident by the longevity of the churches influence on England , which lasted until the reign of King Henry VIII. It took a reformation government in the 16th Century to remove the papal influence, which shows what Pope Innocent III started continued for a long period of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Medieval History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Medieval History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    If sodomy/homosexuality was 'unmentionable' in the Middle Ages, how can we write its history?

    5 star(s)

    Boswell remains the most convincing us that indeed there was a gay subculture in the Middle Ages. "Gay people were prominent, influential and respected at many levels of society at many levels of society."25 His history though has been

  2. A Critical Analysis of the Sack of Limoges (1370) according to Jean Froissart

    14th September 1370 and on the 18th the miners reported that the work was finished.30 The 18th being a significant date for being the anniversary of the Poitiers victory. Therefore we have to ask ourselves, why was it the Froissart said no more than a month?

  1. How important were the political and economic factors in the Christianization of Vikings

    In about 1120, �lnoth wrote that 'the Svear and the G�tar seem to honour the Christian faith only when things go according to their wishes, and luck is on their side', otherwise they 'persecute the Christian faithful and seek to chase them out of the land'.29 From a political perspective,

  2. Free essay

    Effects of the Fourth Lateran Council on Germany. The pope administered legates to each ...

    by its creators.5 The progress that was made regarding attempts to eradicate simony from the German episcopacy is made clear by the actions previously stated. However there were still instances of such crimes within the regions after these efforts had been made.

  1. What were the Reasons for the Successes Achieved by the First Crusade?

    the end of it, they outnumbered many of their opponents, giving them a clear advantage over the Muslims to secure victory. This is what can be deduced in the Siege Nicaea, where Kilij Arslan and his relieving force were beaten back by the larger crusader army.

  2. What can historians learn from Charles VII's letter to bishops in France after the ...

    During the fifteenth century most Christians would have the same beliefs, their lives would have been dictated by their faith and there would be little available to anyone who lived outside the church?s teachings. Most churches had the same basic layout, principles along with fixtures and fittings giving the church its uniformity throughout the land.

  1. How far did the pre-Reformation church meet the needs of the people?

    This superstition was not deviant, perverted or aberrant forms of thought but integral to the overall picture of Christianity. These superstitions have frequently been denounced as flawed views of Christianity and, thus, seen that the Chruch must have somehow failed to satisfy their needs.

  2. To what extent was the English Invasion of Irelandan accident, unforeseen and unplanned?

    One would also expect the Irish annals to have a detailed account of a full-scale invasion, but there is little said of the Normans, which the Annals of Tigernach describe as ?a large body of knights [that] came overseas to Mac Murchada? and little more.[6] Moreover, The Annals of Ulster

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work