• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the major strength and weakness of realist tradition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the major strength and weakness of realist tradition? Theories on international relations of realist tradition were accepted by most as the dominant way explaining global events for the later part of the last century. In recent years realist tradition had come under increasing criticism, as it was not able to explain recent global events. However it still offers compelling insights on how the states conduct themselves in the world. Therefore, we are going to look at the major strength and weakness of the realist tradition. Let us start from its strengths. Firstly, the three core assumptions that form the basis of the theories of realist tradition namely Statism, Survival, Self-help (Dunne & Schmidt, 2001, 150-155) were applicable in most of the situation in international politics. States are still currently viewed as the main actors in world politics although there are increasing influence from non-states actors too. The notion of survival is also evident as states tried to maximise their power to at least ensure their survival. ...read more.

Middle

If this spiral out of control, states might take drastic actions such as declaring war to stop what it perceive as threats against their security. The Cuban missile crisis, might have led to a full-scale nuclear war if restrain were not exercised. India and Pakistan with their arms race and long-standing rivalry are another example However there are also weaknesses in the realist tradition. Firstly, realists often have narrowly defined assumptions in their theories. For example, the power that states seek is mainly military capability. It is in realist tradition to propose that to ensure the survival of the states, the main way to do it is to maximise power through increasing military capability. However, this cannot be used to explain the collapse of Soviet Union. Though it can be argued that America has overtaken Soviet Union in term of military capability, this argument doesn't stand well when the Soviets can still destroy the whole of America with their nuclear weapons despite the lead that America have. ...read more.

Conclusion

Realist tradition placed too much emphasis on state, thus were largely unable to account for such problems caused by non-state actors much less to be able to solve them if the results of America's campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan are anything to go by, with the blowing up of United Nations headquarter in Baghdad being the latest atrocity committed. In conclusion, realist tradition has its strengths in its explanation of the occurrences of wars between states and its principle of self-help is still very much regarded as the way to ensure the survival of the state by most statesman. However, realist tradition was increasing being seen as unable to adapt itself to the "New world", where states are cooperating in more ways than ever before, in the case of European Union, and the rise of non-state actors such as the terrorists playing more significant roles in world politics. Therefore realist tradition must reconstruct itself to take into accounts the new phenomenon that is happening in the world so as to not run a risk of becoming obsolete. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    But Sharon's design quickly unraveled. Gemayel was assassinated. Sharon sent Phalange forces to take control of the Beirut refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, where they slaughtered hundreds of Palestinians. The Israeli inquiry commission into the massacre forced Sharon to resign as defense minister. The PLO didn't vanish.

  2. The importance of non-state actors in the World politics.

    Another evidence of help activities of UN is the bringing up the order in Somalia in 1993 [Waller, 632]. Another example dealing with the strong financial intergovernmental organization is the case of World Bank: its impact on the domestic policy of developing countries.

  1. Caste in India

    What Rudolph perceives today, however, is the evolution of caste into 'caste association': a voluntary category which is usually adopted when it suits political objectives ( 976 ). Indeed, Indian tradition has been mobilised and reshaped meet the rapidly changing post-colonial world ( Gould, 391 ).

  2. Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and its implication for Western Security

    terrorism that were each used previously, airplane hijacking and suicide bombing, but never combined before in this form. The response to this innovation on the part of the antiterrorists in the U.S. government was not innovation, as would be expected, but rather reorganization, creating the U.S.

  1. Is Chinese society becoming more socially diverse? What are the major social sources of ...

    longer one of unconditional support, however, is now guided by the dictates of self-interest. However, the intellectual elite are essential to the society, since they have knowledge of science, technology and social science, like legal studies and economics. Therefore, they can help the new economic elites to control the social opinion and affect government policies.

  2. WITH REFERENCE TO RECENT CONFLICTS, IS IT APPROPRIATE TO FOCUS ON THE STATE, FOREIGN ...

    institutions to regulate their conduct.7 Realism provides the most powerful explanation for the state of war which is a regular condition of life in the international system.8 The aspects that I deal with in this essay are realist ideas that enforce and explain the growing amount of war and conflict.

  1. Critically evaluate post-war realist explanations of international politics with particular reference to power

    that this capacity is unhindered, realists assume that other organisations cannot exercise forms of power sufficient to alter state actions. Power, treated as more-or-less synonymous with violence, is seen as the exclusive preserve of states. The realist account of inter-state anarchy suggests that all states are potential enemies of any particular state.

  2. Compare realist, neorealist and liberal explanations of war. Using examples assess which explanations ...

    Psychologists such as Freud, Piaget have suggested this and if we look at ourselves we can see that majority of us have a similar characteristic but not exactly in the same context as national leaders. This is where classical realists look to.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work