After closely examining the work Bacchus and the Four Seasons in person I noticed many details important that I had missed when studying the piece in the text book.

of art in a museum.         My first impression of the Badminton Sarcophagus was that is appeared to be much larger in person than it did in the textbook. The Sarcophagus was placed on a marble pedestal, which was atop a podium, raising the piece a few feet off the ground. This made the work appear much larger than it really was. This way of presenting the piece was not done to mislead viewers; it puts the sculpture at eye level so viewers do not have to bend down to see the work.         The skin of the marble figures was so finely polished, that it was almost reflective. The smooth marble appeared somewhat waxy. This waxy texture runs throughout the piece into the hair and all throughout the rest of the work. The most recognizable and most surprising difference I noticed was the surface detail of the hair on the figures. The stylization of the hair seems extremely exaggerated. The deep holes create shadows which greatly enhance the illusion of depth.                 The extreme undercutting and use of shadows really portray the fine workmanship of the Sarcophagus. It is obvious that whomever worked on the piece was truly a master of their trade because not only did they carve this very intricate piece of art but they were confident enough in their skills that they risked ruining it by undercutting in many areas of the sculpture to crate deep shadows that create an overwhelming sense of depth. The linen fabric drapery over some of the figures is also skillfully crafted. The folding of the fabric casts realistic shadows and also creates more depth. The workers use of a hand drill was also pretty obvious in the stylization of the hair. These exaggerated marks create deep shadows from far away but are quite puzzling, as you get closer up.         After closely examining the work Bacchus and the Four Seasons  in person I noticed many details important that I had missed when studying the piece in the text book. When I first viewed the piece in my textbook I pictured it having a rough freshly cut marble texture, but after viewing it up close at the museum I realized that the whole piece was extremely smooth and polished. I also did not understand how much undercutting there was until I saw the piece in person. This undercutting is a key detail in the piece and is impossible to see in the textbook picture.        The scale of the piece is another con of viewing the Sarcophagus from a picture. My initial impression from the textbook was that it was maybe 3 feet long, but in person I was surprised to find the piece much larger than i had thought. The differences listed are all very important, and I now understand that it is important for a Pratt art student to understand and recognize these differences because we cant always trust these first impressions we get when looking at art in a textbook, because many times just one picture cannot portray the full piece. Pratt students as well as other art students should realize what a gift it is to have the luxury of being able to visit museums and study the sculpture and artwork in person. The emotion you get from seeing original art work first hand is a completely different experience than viewing it within the confines of a book.