• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stanislavski's System and 19th Century Theatre Tradition

Extracts from this document...


Stanislavski Essay Bryn Davies Today we can consider acting as an "art form", with all the dignity, nuance and technical precision of painting, or music, or literature, or any other creative entity to which we attribute that noble title. However, it was not always valued as such. Undoubtedly this is due in part to its fleeting nature- until the invention of film, it could leave no imprint on history but for the accounts of audiences. Perhaps equally important though, was the absence of any structured method for interpreting a role in all its emotional subtleties. Until the early 20th century, acting students depended on replication of their teachers, and of proceeding successful performances, in their stage craft, without any real consideration for a process or an underlying motive. Without a fundamental understanding of the character's "inner life", movements on stage were mechanical and thoughtless. Moreover, the prevalent acting style across Europe in the late 19th Century was melodramatic, unrealistic, and ultimately un-emotive. Into this artistically bankrupt age emerged Konstantin Stanislavski (1863-1938), a man whose influence shapes the landscape of dramatic art even today. His dissatisfaction with the state of theatre in his native Russia and his work in the Moscow Art Theatre led him to a fundamental re-evaluation of accepted conventions and ultimately to the development of his "System" for naturalistic acting. ...read more.


Rehearsal time was scarce, and a continual prompt was used. Until the use of directional lighting in 1881, actors were further confined close to the apron. In the late 19th century, these technological advances, combined with a changing political and social climate, paved the way for Stanislavski's ideas. The theatre in Russia, being state owned, had traditionally laboured under heavy censorship laws. It's power as an educator, a pulpit for radical ideas and social change, had not gone unnoticed by the Imperial Court, and any play which was considered to incite notions of political upheaval or discontent was not permitted for performance. In 1882, however, theatre was commercialised, and a number of private theatre companies emerged. While many were content in continuing the financially dependable, but insipid farces and operettas that characterised the proceeding years of creative inertia, some had a genuine interest in the development of a new kind of drama. The "Moscow Art Theatre" was one such establishment. Stanislavski recognised the unacceptability of his contemporary theatrical tradition, especially when interpreting the work of writers of such subtlety and psychological depth as Anton Chekhov. Indeed, the inadequacies of a traditional approach to productions was exemplified by the disastrous first performance of Chekov's The Seagull at the Alexandra Theatre in 1896. However, When Stanislavski himself revived the play two years later at the Moscow Art Theatre, applying to Chekhov's nuanced characters the emotional honesty and artistic integrity of his emerging System, it was considered an unequivocal triumph. ...read more.


He could not be content with offering them "a funny anecdote", but felt compelled to satisfy their "spiritual needs". The Meiningen Company were another influence on Stanislavski's ideas. Touring Europe, the company's influence was widely felt across the continent. Having first seen the well disciplined, ensemble-style group in 1891, Stanislavski was inspired in his quest for a unified "coherent" production. Anton Chekhov (1860-1904) was undoubtedly a powerful catalyst to Stanislavski's work. His plays offered the psychological realism to which the System lends itself. "Let (the theatre) be as complex and as simple as life itself. People dine and at the same time their happiness is made or their lives are broken." Stanislavski's struggle to comprehend and express on stage the subtext and delicacy of Chekhov's writing is inextricably tied to the evolution of the System itself. Stanislavski believed the theatre should not be a thoughtless approximation of the surface of life, but an exploration of an internal reality, a spiritual guide, a profound, beautiful and human thing. "What is important to me is not the truth outside myself, but the truth within myself." The 20th century was born into a changing world- of technology, of industrialization, of revolution. Stanislavski's System would survive all these, its artistic integrity unbroken, an organic pursuit for a theatre of truth. ""Learn to see, hear, love life - learn to carry this over into art, use it to fill the image you create for yourself..." - Konstantin Stanislavski ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Theatre Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Theatre Studies essays

  1. Stanislavski and the Stanislavski System of Method Acting.

    Through the use of the super-objective, an actor can develop a 'through line' - a metaphorical towline that can be grasped when an actor is unsure of their motivation. Put simply, it gives an overriding driving force to a character's behavior.

  2. Audience Interaction. The Trial was performed by Splendid Theatre Company on Friday 19th November ...

    the audience consider Josef K's position objectively, as the fourth wall has been broken, we were not emotionally engaged; therefore not influenced by these emotions.

  1. The Devising Process

    also its naturalism, which resulted in a stronger connection and fuller characters. Myself and Naomi, both being very organised and committed, took it upon ourselves to arrange props and costume. As the piece; lacking scenery, relied heavily on its aesthetics, we found that lists, bulletins and organisation skills helped this element of the piece come together.

  2. AS Theatre Studies Portfolio

    So God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, ... You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. 15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring [a] and hers; he will crush [b] your head, and you will strike his heel."

  1. Musical Theatre Report

    Gemma from our performing arts group is also performing a solo song from the musical. This just shows how popular they where and how talented they where and what we wouldn't have without them. Rodgers and Hammerstein hired ballet choreographer Agnes de Mille, who used everyday motions to help the characters express their ideas.

  2. Drama and Theatre studies - practical- coursework

    The group were too focused on figuring out what or how these women will get their "own back", we came to the conclusion that the only way to do this was to have it as an unrealistic scene.

  1. Drama and Theatre Studies DR4 Process Journal

    This helped me to understand more clearly the words I was saying and what they meant, despite their Elizabethan style. Whale Music- Anthony Minghella's first theatrical success was written, and presumable set in, 1981. Therefore the drama is modern in comparison to Shakespeare, though we did discuss possibilities of attitudes having changed since the 1980s.

  2. Drama and Theatre Studies structured records

    Whilst creating the character Angela's 'fantasy' persona we analysed the reality Angela. Angela shows boredom towards her monotonous life. Through her character we hoped to communicate to the audience the necessity of having hobbies and dreams. The fantasy Angela emerged through the improvisation of a Latin American soap opera.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work