America In Vietnam, 1953-73

Authors Avatar

         

        

        

AMERICA IN VIETNAM, 1953-73

By 1973, the American President, Richard Nixon, had withdrawn all ground troops from South Vietnam under his programme of 'Vietnamisation' and during the summer, the American Congress passed an act over Nixon's veto, the War Powers Act, which removed Nixon's power to order the American Airforce to bomb NVA positions in Vietnam.   THIS WAS THE END OF AMERICAN INVOLVEMENT IN VIETNAM!!

Since that time, people have asked why was one of the World's Superpowers effectively defeated(The US military deny defeat) by a pre-industrial peasant country.

AMERICA WAS FORCED TO WITHDRAW BY 1973 BECAUSE:

A.         1961-1968 The US government and military were losing the

war before the 1968 TET OFFENSIVE in South Vietnam

because of:

1. LACK OF PRESIDENTIAL COMMITMENT

Johnson, 1965-68

President Johnson’s Secretary of Defence, Robert McNamara, said in 1967 that American

aims in South Vietnam were,

        “70% to avoid a humiliating US defeat.  20% to keep South Vietnamese territory from Chinese hands.  10% to permit the people of South Vietnam to enjoy a better, freer way of life.

 

Johnson did not want to lose Vietnam but also did not want to commit all the resources

of America to winning in Vietnam because he wanted to divert money to his Great Society

Programme so he gave General Westmoreland just enough troops NOT to lose but not

enough to win in the face of increasing North Vietnam incursion into South Vietnam.

 

        March 65        -        3500 marines land at Da Nang to protect the US airbase

        July                -        up from 75000 to 125,000

        Dec                -        to 184,000                }

        Feb 66                -        to 235,000                }        Not `Advisors'

        Sept                -        to 325,000                }        now ground troops.

        Aug 67                -        to 525,000

This gradual build up was consistently met by a greater commitment from North Vietnam so Westmoreland could not win.

Once the USA became fully militarily involved in Vietnam the financial cost became massive:

        1963                $105 million/month

        1968                $2,000 million/month(which LBJ lied about saying it was only  $800M/month)

-this level of gov't spending created a massive public debt, created rising inflation(5.3%), forced an 10% increase in the income tax surcharge in 1968 and killed LBJ's Great Society Programme of much needed social reforms for the poor because of a lack of money.

-Blacks rioted in Watts, Los Angeles 1965 and Newark, New Jersey 1967 because of their very poor social and economic situation demonstrated the need of these reforms.

-not even America could afford to spend $30,000 million a year on a war it was not winning.

These economic costs came under public scrutiny and criticism which increased opposition to the war which in America began very small but grew as the war in Vietnam seemed to drag on and on and, after Tet, seemed unwinnable.  The human and economic costs of the war made it unacceptable to many  more people.  This growing opposition and military difficulty led LBJ and his gov't to pursue a peace settlement with the Vietnamese Communists.

Nixon, 1968-1973

Nixon’s commitment was limited by his 1968 campaign promise to withdraw American soldiers from South Vietnam which made it impossible to defeat the North because of corrupt and very poor morale in the ARVN.

US Troops in South Vietnam:                1968                536 000 ground troops

                                        1969                475 000         “

                                        1970                335 000         “

                                        1971                157 000        “

                                        1972                  65 000        “

                                        1973                  24 000        “

To compensate for the lack of ground troops Nixon used illegal secret bombing of North Vietnam and of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Laos and Cambodia(two neutral countries NOT at war)

1969-71        -US Airforce dropped 2,539,743 million tons of bombs = more than total f WWII

1969-70        -3,630 secret B52 bombing raids on neutral Cambodia targeting

                the Ho  Chi Minh Trail.

                -LAOS - 4500 bombing raids/month in 1969 increased to 12500

                        - 15000/month         in 1970 again targeting the Ho Chi Minh Trail

ALL of these raid were illegal attacks upon neutral countries at peace with the US and without the approval of the US Congress.

Nixon would also halt bombing to pander to public opinion.  In October 1972, Nixon ordered a halt to bombing north of the 20th Parallel and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger claimed “Peace was at hand”.

But Nixon would NOT bomb Hanoi, the capital of North Vietnam, nor Haiphong, the major harbour and port serving North Vietnam for fear of sinking Russian or Chinese ships who were bringing supplies to N Vietnam because Nixon was afraid of causing an international incident

2. BAD MILITARY STRATEGY AND TACTICS

General Westmoreland controlled strategy and tactics in South Vietnam after 1965 and he adopted a strategy of ATTRITION and the tactics of SEARCH AND DESTROY, BOMBING and PACIFICATION:

US military actions in Vietnam actually alienated the very people who the US claimed to

be saving from Communism, the South Vietnamese therefore increasing support for

the Vietcong:

ATTRITION:

Westmoreland believed that American forces could kill more VC and NVA soldiers than could be replaced.  Johnson and Westmoreland often spoke the “crossing over point” when the attrition strategy would become successful BUT this ignored the fact that the Vietnamese saw the war as a struggle for National survival and would fight to the end:

“It is the duty of my generation to die for my country”  taken from a diary of a VC fighter

The Pentagon Papers calculated that Attrition needed to kill at a rate of 10 VC/NVA to every 1 American which could not be achieved.

SEARCH AND DESTROY:

Search and Destroy meant that the American troops did not try secure territory and clear it of

VC but instead the troops lived in ‘hard points’ or heavily defended camps in areas of VC

strength and went out on regular patrols to find and kill the VC.

The average age of the grunt/soldiers in Vietnam was 19, compared to the less vulnerable 26 in the second World War which meant that often soldiers under the intense psychological pressure of constant fear of ambush would commit atrocities such as the My Lai Massacre on March 16, 1968 when Charlie Company killed almost five hundred women, old men, children and even infants.

Because of attrition the emphasis was on enemy body counts.  Dead bodies were invented or created.  The most famous but by no means the only example of American atrocity was the statement “If it’s dead and Vietnamese, its VC”.  

Testimony at the 1970 Court Martial Trial of William Calley after the massacre at My Lai on 16 March 1968.

BOMBING:

        -SV suffered B-52 high altitude carpet bombing and constant artillery bombardment in an effort to destroy the rural support for the VC:

- 1965 TTL Bombing = 315,000 tons

                   Artillery   = 577,000 tons

- 1969 TTL Bombing = 1,388,000 tons

                Artillery   = 1,374,000 tons

        

Crops of the SV peasantry in VC areas were actually targeted for spraying with the lethal Agent Orange. The use of Agent Orange isolated the Vietnamese people from the Americans even more, putting the people against the Americans.

1962 – 5         130,000 acres of crops were blighted.

1967 alone         121,400 acres were  sprayed and crops destroyed.

Agent Orange’s active ingredient was dioxin which is the most carcinogenic chemical known to exist and causes gross birth defects(children with two heads or no head), abortions and mutations

.  

Two million SV peasants were forced to flee their land as refugees and to live in filthy, unhealthy, overcrowded camps -the American aid money spent on maintaining the refugees for a year was less than the money spent on the war in one half of a day

Harrison Salisbury  (a Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter).  December 1966 he wrote an account 2 weeks after the Defence Department denied bombing civilian areas or Hanoi at all.  He wrote “inspections of several damaged sites and talks with witnesses make it clear that Hanoi residents certainly believed that they were bombed by US planes, that they certainly observed US planes overhead and that damage certainly occurred right in the centre of town.”

Between June 1965 and December 1966 Nam Dinh (City) suffered 51 raids, 100’s of civilian casualties and 89 deaths.

Frank Harvey went to Vietnam in 1966 to report on the air war for the magazine “Flying”.  His book “Air War – Vietnam” in the summer of 1967 revealed some of the horrors and atrocities that the young pilots were subjected to.

Join now!

“He learns how it feels to drop bombs on human beings and watch huts go up in

. . . orange flames when his aluminium napalm tanks tumble into them.”

It was estimated that 1961-65 89,000 Vietcong had been killed and considering the indiscriminate use of bombing and artillery it is impossible to say how many were innocent civilians.  By 1966, the American CIA estimated at least 30,000 civilians were killed by American forces.   One US General admitted to a French reporter, Jean Bertolino, that he hunted VC from his helicopter with a rifle, when the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay