The Arab-Israeli conflict.

Authors Avatar

The Arab-Israeli Conflict

        “Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered in the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948?”

        This coursework will focus on the countries outside the Middle East who have helped or hindered and how in the search of a resolution (if a resolution has been achieved or not).

        The key points which will be purposeful are:-

Powers – this refers to the countries outside the Middle East who had power.

Helped - this refers to the countries that have helped find a solution.

Hindered – this refers to the countries who had led the warring countries astray in finding a resolution.

Resolution – This refers to if a solution to the problem of the conflict was found or not.

        This coursework will start with the history/origins of the conflict.

        In the First World War when Turkey joined forces with Germany, Britain wrote a letter to Sheriff Hussein of Mecca.  Britain persuaded the Arab countries to up rise against their Turkish rulers, promising the Arabs that Great Britain is prepared to recognise and support the independence of all Arab states after the war.

        One of the key roles was sir McMahon’s letter, who was the British High Commissioner in Egypt.  A letter was written to McMahon of what was wanted.  This letter of Hussein’s was responded to by McMahon, but this letter was a problem as one part of the letter was in the interpretation of the alteration proposed by McMahon and the other part was in the phrase ‘when the situation allows.’  This was the beginning of the problems.

        The Arabs were not totally convinced of British pledges but this letter was enough for the Arabs to rise in revolt against the Turks.  The Arabs accepted Britain’s promises and set out an army against the Turks.  In 1918, the Turks were defeated.  It seemed as though independence would be given.

        However, the Arabs would not of have been as happy if they knew about the Sykes-Picot agreement.  Britain and France had drawn-up and made secret agreements of dividing the Middle-East between them when the war was over.  Britain would have Palestine, and what eventually became Jordan and Iraq.  The French were to have what became known as Lebanon and Syria.  Even Tsarist Russia and Italy were to have parts.

        The Arabs were infuriated to see how they had been deceived by their associate.  This was made worse when Arthur Balfour stated that the British Cabinet were amiable in setting-up a national home for the Jewish people.  Balfour then persuaded the rest of the governments that approval for the Jews (Zionism) would bring the USA in the war as they had a prominent Jewish community, the USA would then contribute in the war on Britain’s side.  Balfour then sent a letter to the leading British Jew, Lord Rothschild, promising indefinable support for a ‘national home’ for the Jews in Palestine.  This letter came to be known as the Balfour Declaration.  Another reading of the Balfour Declaration is that it was to make sure familiarity was dependable with any country around the Suez Canal.

        After the First World War Jews and Arabs were subjected to dissatisfaction as independence was not positive, instead it developed into a ‘mandated territory.’

        One of the first problems the Arabs faced was escalating immigration.  The Jews were flooding into Palestine and residing in a substantial amount of land and not letting Arabs work on their land, thus this led to the Jews occupying and taking control of certain areas.  Altercation and rows between the two parties were ignited.

        Britain thought a solution to the dilemma was restricting immigration; however this was dropped by the government.  Immigration to Palestine increased when the Nazis in Germany took over.  For those Jews escaping Nazi harassment Palestine was not just a homeland but also a place of safety.

        Another cause of tension was the movement of the junior judge in Jerusalem, Mohammed Amin al-Hussein, known as the ‘Mufti.’  This group eliminated Jewish settlers and also any Arab who tried to live with and work with the Jews.  In return Britain allowed the Jews to set-up their own defence force, known as the Haganah.  As well as being a governmental organisation it was set-up without endorsement.

Join now!

        As immigration rose the Arabs also rose in revolt and a guerrilla war broke out, but when the Arabs attacked, the British defeated them and were then discharged, but the Zionist groups were allowed to keep their armaments.  This put the Jews in a much physically powerful position than the Arabs.

        During this Arab revolt, attitudes of the British government began to change towards the Zionist project.  A white paper stated that Britain did not support a separate Jewish State and neither a partitioned Palestine.  Instead Britain called for a United Palestine with both Jews and Arab contributing control of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay