• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion? By studying the Dutch Revolt and analysing the four passages, it is apparent that the three main causes were Philip, Alva and Religion; I will also argue that social tensions and economics were an additional contribution. It is clear that the presence of Calvinists in the Netherlands was not the most significant cause. Although Parker's idea that the amount of Calvinist activity prompted the revolt seems valid, his argument is limited as it does not show Philip's reactions to the activity. I intend to demonstrate that the underlying cause was Philip himself, consequently agreeing partially with Limm. However I will demonstrate that rather than it being Philip aiming to Hispanicise it is evident that his lack of dedication to the Netherlanders, alienation of the nobles and his leaving the country under inadequate control drove the Netherlanders into revolt. I intend to show that the combination of Geyl and Limm's interpretation is the most accurate, with Parker's idea of the Calvinists being a catalyst to the revolt. Whilst Philip was an underlying cause who had created social tensions, Alva was the trigger for the revolt due to him worsening ...read more.


He effectively neglected the government by settling for Margaret, who had little administrative or diplomatic experience, which demonstrates his lack of interest in the running of the Netherlands. Philip was constantly distracted by wars with France and the Turks, and made it clear that the cost of keeping such a large army had to fall on the Netherlanders. Philip, as Peter Limm says, continually tried to centralize; "...believed that Spain, and especially Castile, was the centre of the Habsburg monarchy." The Dutch nobility were distressed by Philip's actions - his appointment of Granvelle to inner Spanish consultata and the new bishoprics scheme - 14 new bishoprics, each with two inquisitors as assistants caused cries of protests. Philip had no intention of letting the Dutch nobility control policy making - their desire to restore the traditional style of administration threatened his centralisation plans. Although I agree with Peter Limm that Philip was the main cause of the revolt, he is mistaken in thinking Philip's aim was to Hispanicise. "Philip was less inclined than his father to compromise with traditional ruling" - however, Philip's provinces were also worried about their traditional preferences being destroyed, thus contradicting strongly with Limm's main argument. ...read more.


When assessing the historians, it seems that the most accurate interpretations are B, C and D. Pieter Geyl has correctly assessed the impact of Alva; he describes Alva's Blood Council and touches on Alva's savage ambition in intimidation. Nevertheless, Geyl only focuses on Alva's persecution, but neglects his poor reaction to the rebels. Peter Limm touches on Philip being the main cause of the revolt, but although I agree Philip was the primary reason, it is clear that the idea of him pursuing a policy of Hispanicisation is not entirely accurate and may have been a misinterpretation of Philip's absence. Although it was not main cause, I agree with Geoffrey Parker's idea that the amount of Calvinist activity may have triggered the cause of the revolt; however his argument is limited as it does not show Philip's reactions to the activity. Parker links Geyl's and Limm's interpretations to produce the most accurate analysis. The combination seems to form a strong basis on why the Revolt of 1572 occurred, but I strongly disagree with John Motley's interpretation of the impact of the Spanish Inquisition, as although Philip did target heresy strongly, there were few Inquisitors in the Netherlands and the fear of the Inquisition was greater than the presence itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    Alexandra did not know how to handle World War 1, and was extremely unpopular during this period. This was because of her German heritage, and as the German's were incredibly unpopular, she was seen as the enemy, plotting against the country she reigned with her husband.

  2. Assess the view that Philip II as king of Spain was Absolute in Theory ...

    The truth is, they need to see that I am mortal". Therefore again shows that even Philip saw himself as limited monarch, nothing more nothing less. Another point to be raised must be that Philip was not in total control of his whole government, and it was not working as effectively as it should due to his huge territory.

  1. The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new ...

    A second reform which was brought in in 1829 was the outlaw of the traditional practice of sati, a cultural tradition which had been in place in India for generations. When a male warrior was killed in battle it was expected the wife of the warrior would throw herself into

  2. 'Financially dependent, without property and denied a political and legal status.' To what extent ...

    Some guilds permitted men to discriminating women such as in the guild of Parisian chandlers where Guillemette Olivier barred a female worker from practicing the specific craft due to her lack of aptitude.

  1. By 1598, Spain was essentially bankrupt and Philip III inherited a nation seemingly doomed ...

    The economic problem of the lack of investment in industry was to cause serious problems later in Philip?s reign, since many foreign competitors seized the monopoly Spain had once had in trade with America and provided them with cheaper prices.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    of St Petersburg, churches were based upon ones in London and the town houses Peter wanted his nobility to build were based upon merchant houses Peter had seen on his travels in Amsterdam. Peter bought in the Italian architect Domenico Trezzini who had great experience in building on marsh land which St Petersburg was built upon.

  1. To what extent did PLO action from 1968 represent a shift in terrorist activity?

    This encouraged other terrorist groups such as the ASALA, the JCAG and left-wing groups such as the German Red Army Faction to ?internationalize? their political struggles. This showed the shift in terrorism from older previous terrorist groups. Terrorist groups such as the People?s will acted on ?propaganda by deed? and

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    John Locke believed people had three natural rights, Life, Liberty and Property and believed it was the government?s duty to fulfil these rights due to the huge poverty whilst the king lived in diamonds. This can be linked with the Earls in Medieval England and the Pharaohs, all of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work