Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as Lenin's successor?

Authors Avatar

PRATIK MEHTA                H/W

26/11/2003

Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as Lenin’s successor?

Personally I am very surprised that Trotsky did not become Lenin's successor. Trotsky unlike Stalin put himself out there with the Russian people, talking at rallies giving numerous public speeches earning their support. Stalin however was more the administrator, behind the scenes in an office rather than out in the streets speaking to the people or travelling Russia on a train, recruiting soldiers like Trotsky often did.

Stalin however was most clever, he used his position in the Bolshevik party to appoint his key supporters to higher positions within the party, so that when the time came he would get their votes, which would be very important if he was to become Lenin's successor. Stalin also took up many very boring but important positions of power such as Commissar for Nationalities and General Secretary, which helped him gradually begin to gain more control in all spheres. Stalin also arranged for all opposing him to be sent to remote posts elsewhere. Stalin was also very good at having opponents disposed of so they could no longer pose as a threat to him

Join now!

When Lenin died, Stalin played a cruel trick on Trotsky who at the time had fallen ill. Stalin told Trotsky that Lenin's funeral was a day earlier than it actually was, allowing Stalin to appear alone at Lenin's funeral as his chief mourner and closest friend. Stalin was constantly trying to portrait himself to the public as a man who was like Lenin, who was very popular. By doing this he could make the public associate him with Lenin who was a great leader and admired.

Not only did Trotsky's naivety as to Stalin's cunning count against him, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay