• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the advertisement constitutes an 'offer' or an 'invitation to treat'.

Extracts from this document...


CONTRACT LAW First Term Unassessed Essay 1. On 2nd January 1999, Sarah reads in a local newspaper, "The Brighton Bugle", that a well known local sports enthusiast, Mick Muscle, was offering �5,000 to the first person to swim from Southsea to the Isle of Wight before 10th January, 1999. Sarah, a keen swimmer, set about her preparations. On 6th January, 1999, a retraction appeared in "The Hove Herald' stating that Mick's original offer was cancelled and, instead, the prize was now to be �500 to the first person to cycle from Brighton to Oxford before 12th January, 1999. Sarah was a regular reader of "The Brighton Bugle" and no other newspaper. She did not see the retraction in "The Hove Herald". On 9th January, Sarah went down to the beach at Southsea to commence her swim to the Isle of Wight. A bystander, who identified himself as Rick Muscle (Mick's brother), told her that the swimming prize had been cancelled and she should "go and get her cycling gear on". Sarah disregarded this statement and proceeded with her swim. Rick Muscle notified his brother, Mick, who promptly hired a boat and caught up with Sarah in the middle of her swim. Mick shouted at her through a megaphone, telling her of the withdrawal of the reward for the swim. Sarah was not deterred and completed her swim to the Isle of Wight. ...read more.


of the Principles of European Contract Law, and as illustrated in the case of Shuey v United States.10 In this case there had been a notice published offering a reward for information which would lead to the capture of a criminal. Seven months later another notice was published revoking the offer. The plaintiff 'discovered the whereabouts of the criminal'11 the following year and notified the authorities with the intention of claiming the reward, as he had been unaware of the revocation of the offer. It was held that he was not entitled to the reward. The fact that he was not aware of the revocation was held to be irrelevant, since 'it was withdrawn through the same channel through which it was made'12 and he 'should have known that it could be revoked in the manner in which it was made'.13 A second attempt was made to revoke the offer, which clearly indicates that 'reasonable steps were taken' as in Shuey, by Mick arriving at the beach and informing Sarah that the swimming competition had been called off. The general rule is that revocation need not be communicated by the offeree, but may be made by a reliable third party, as in the case of Dickinson v Dodds14. In this case the defendant, Mr Dodds, wrote to the plaintiff, Mr Dickinson, agreeing to sell him his house, and added that the offer would be held over for two days. ...read more.


Authority for this can be found in the case of Williams v Cawardine20 where the defendant offered a reward for information leading to the conviction of a murderer. The plaintiff knew of this offer and gave information that it was her husband after he had beaten her, believing she had not long to live and to ease her conscience. It was held that the plaintiff was entitled to the reward as she knew about it and her motive in giving the information was irrelevant. In conclusion, it is doubtful whether Sarah would have any claim for the swimming prize, since it appears there had been an effective revocation of the offer by Mick's brother at the beach. She would also not be entitled to the prize for cycling to Oxford, as she had not known of the offer until after her return from Oxford to Brighton. 1 McKendrick, E. 2003. Contract Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press. P63. 2 [1968] 1 WLR 1204 3 Op.Cit. Note 1 4 Collins, H. 1997. The Law of Contract. London. Butterworths. P60. 5 [1893] 1 QB 256, CA 6 Op. Cit. Note 1. p.50 7 Ibid. p127 8 Byrne & Co v Van TienHoven & Co (1879) 5 CPD 344 9 Op.Cit. Note 1. p.130 10 (1875) 92 US 73. 11 Op.Cit. Note 1. p. 130 12 Op.Cit. Note 9. Judgement of Strong J 13 Ibid. 14 (1876) 2 Ch D 463 15 [1952] 1 KB 290 16Op.Cit. Note 1.P 124 17Ibid. p.126 18 (1927) 40 CLR 227 19Op.Cit. Note 1. p127 20 (1833) 5 C & P 566 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using relevant case law explain why the distinction between an invitation to treat and ...

    3 star(s)

    The plaintiff went to park his car in the defendant's automatic car park. A notice was visible at the entrance stating the charges and a sign-'cars parked at own risk'. Plaintiff took a ticket from the machine. The ticket stated the time of arrival and small print that it was

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The plaintiff then telegraphed, we agree to buy Bumper Pen Hall for �900 asked by you. The court held that there is no contract concluded as the reply of defendant is just and mere statement of price. Gibson v Manchester City Council 1979 The council sent to tenants details of a scheme for the sale of council houses.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    4. DISCHARGE BY BREACH. Actual breach: one party fails to perform a contractual obligation. Anticipatory breach: one party shows an intention not to perform. Where there is an anticipatory breach the innocent party can accept the breach and immediately sue for breach of contract or they may refuse to accept it and wait until the due date of performance.

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    While if all invitations to tender resulted in every person making a referential bid it would be impossible to determine which offers had been made. Therefore we can invalidate the referential bid made by Optimus PLC and allow the offer of �2500 for the widget machine to be considered as the offer made by the company.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    This case legally connects but seems morally unsatisfactory for Sheena's case. This proving that Sheena could not accept the reward unless Nick decided to give it her, although he does not have to do this. An Australian case similar to this was R v Clarke where a different conclusion was reached.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    20 October Letter of revocation received in New York. The offeree had meanwhile resold the contract goods. The outcome of the case was the letter of revocation could not take effect until received (20 October). Simply posting a letter does not revoke the offer until it is received. Therefore there was no binding contract.

  1. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    While it is clear that the revocation must be acknowledge to the attention of the offeree, it is not entirely clear as to when the revocation is treated as being brought to his attention. In The Brimnes [1975] QB 929, it was held, if a revocation sent by telex during

  2. Assess the problems that arise through terminating and offer

    The offer cannot be revoked if it has already been accepted in the period of time given or it has been accepted before the offeror has revoked it. For example Routledge v Grant (1828) in which Grant put his house up for sale for a period of six weeks, before

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work