• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the nature of legal and moral rules , and consider whether the law does and should reflect moral rules

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the nature of legal and moral rules. Consider whether the law does and should reflect moral rules. ( AQA A2 UNIT 6 - LAW AND MORALS ) A rule was defined by Twining and Miers as a general norm mandating conduct. For a legal rule, the breaking of rules will result in a punishment, such as a fine, prison or a criminal record. Legal rules are there to keep society in order. Moral rules, however, are sometimes not deliberately made, and are within the individual due to beliefs they have, or due to the fact they would feel guilty if they participated in the breaking of the rule. Sometimes moral rules come from religion. For example, Muslims can only eat meat if it Halal meat. Therefore, Muslim children will grow up with the idea that it is wrong to eat any other meat. Moral rules, if broken, have no punishment apart from the person's guilt. ...read more.

Middle

One example is the diversity of opinions on abortion. The Abortion Act 1967 made it legal for women to abort their unborn babies. Although it may be legal, many people disagree with abortion; this is therefore an example of when law conflicts with morals, as it is only upholding some of the countries morals. An example where most of the nation would agree to the law due to their own morals are the offences set down in the offences against the person's act 1861, and the laws on murder. However, the law doesn't reflect morals in some cases. One example is adultery. The Ten Commandments rule that adultery should not be committed, and most people would agree, but there is no law in the UK against committing adultery anymore. Another way in which law reflects morals is the law on euthanasia. A lot of people believe euthanasia is wrong, as everyone has a right to live. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in R v Brown, some homosexual sadomasochists caused injury to each other's genitals, but all had consented to this injury. This wasn't held to be acceptable, as the law on assault had been breached. Devlin would agree with this decision, as he stated that judges should still preserve common morality. Others in society would not have agreed with the actions in the case of Brown, which shows Devlins argument. From this discussion we can see that there is a diversity of morals through the UK, and the law reflects some of these morals, for example the moral of not killing is reflected with murder; but not others, for example , adultery and abortion are not crimes, but most people would see these as wrong. We can also see that there are two sides to the argument of whether law should reflect morality or whether it should be a separate thing, AND Professor Hart and Professor Devlin both have valid points. Different individuals will agree with different points of view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Law and Morality. Within the justice system there is a genuine relationship between law ...

    Moreover, the Wolfenden Committee had used Mill's liberal view when looking at the laws surrounding prostitution and homosexuality. He believed that the laws on prostitution and homosexuality should be more liberal and he argued that they should not constitute as crimes.

  2. Law and Morals

    as a means to create sexual awareness, something that many may consider to be morally right. There are also legal issues, such as parking laws and building without permission, that do not give society as a whole moral concern, and this is also true of making and selling/buying pirate DVDs.

  1. Judical Creativity in Law

    This rule comes from the case of Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd. But that case did allow for 3 exceptions where the Court of Appeal need not follow it's own past decisions. Where: 1. There are conflicting decisions in past Court of Appeal cases, the court can choose which

  2. Law and Morals

    Aquinas saw it coming from God while Aristotle believed it came from nature. John Mill's theory of utilitarism which proposed that the moral action was the one that produced good for the many even if it was at the expense of the one.

  1. A rule as to precedent (which any court lays down for itself) is not ...

    Hence, it was firmly decided in Davis, that COA is bound by their own decisions, except for the exceptions outlined in Young. The intriguing part is, the HOL while rebuking Denning for his attidude, actually affirmed the decision in Court of Appeal.

  2. Free essay

    Examine the relationship between law and morals. Consider the extent to which the law ...

    the Bible, the Torah and the Quran. Morals, unlike the law, are voluntary beliefs on how people 'ought' to behave and what individuals think is 'right' and 'wrong' behaviour. Although there is no punishment for not accepting these beliefs, there may be an informal type of enforcement by which people

  1. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Through these reforms the Government hoped to improve the quality and accessibility of the legal services on offer, while keeping a tighter control on their budget. The Legal Aid Board was abolished and replaced by the Legal Services Commission. In order to develop the standard and accessibility of legal services

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    In fact, at this point it is probably not the most effective way of deterring crime. If the government actually made people stay in jail for the amount of time they were assigned in their sentence, a lot less crime would be happening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work