• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Morals

Extracts from this document...


Law And Morals Law is a set of rules and boundaries that are established by authorities which must be obeyed; otherwise a sanction may be given. Law was described by Sir John Salmond as 'the body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration is not law and has of justice'. While Morals are beliefs, values and principles that are set by society or part of a society, determining what is right and wrong. Natural Law holds that Law and Morality are connected. Law is not simply what is enacted in statues and if legislation is not moral, then it is not law and has no authority. St Thomas Aquinas called such law (without moral content) a "perversion of law". Natural law theory asserts that there is an essential connection between law and morality. This vie is frequently summarised by the maxim 'an unjust law is not a true law'. It follows that if it is not true law we need not obey it. ...read more.


This is what was established in the case of Gillick. Where Mrs Gillick sought a declaration that what she saw as an immoral activity (contraceptive advice and treatment available to girls under the age of consent) was illegal regarding its immorality. There was a conflict as some thought it was immoral while other felt it was moral. This shows that if such conflict arises between law and morality then the two can't be viewed as equal. Morals can be seen as a set of values that are enforced by the law. They define not how one 'must' act but how one 'ought' to act and whilst they are not subject to moral enforcement, they can be informally imposed. On the other hand, Law can be related to this culture for example Lord Atkin's neighbour principle which is the basis of the tort of negligence and derived from the biblical command 'to love thy neighbour'. With actions like theft and murder they are classed as 'wrong' both morally and legally but for crimes such as parking ...read more.


Devlin, however was strongly opposed to the report on what might be as a natural law approach. He felt that society had a certain moral standard which the law had a duty to support. The Report supported Hart's view that law and morality should be separate but various cases decided since the report show that many judges are imposing their moral views in their judgements such as in the case of R v Brown ( defendant's willingly consented to sado-masochistic practises). Even though none of them complained to the police they were prosecuted and convictions were upheld based on public policy to defend the morality of the society. As illustrated the law is seen to attempt to uphold what it considers to be public morality even if some may dispute the correctness of that moral code. In conclusion there is a close relationship between law and morals as the law upholds moral values in some cases but the extent to which law should be influenced by morality remains topical. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alexandra Popovici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    "Miscarriages of justice" in criminal cases are seen in the media if they occur, and only recently the case of R v Downing was a prime example of a miscarriage of justice where the defendant had spent 28 years in jail, primarily because he would not show remorse for the crime he allegedly committed.

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Therefore labelling theory seems unable to explain every individual case. However labelling theorists warn that state intervention, when an offender is convicted and put through the criminal justice system, can cause more harm than good when their ties to 'normal' society grow weaker and weaker.

  1. Law and Morality. Within the justice system there is a genuine relationship between law ...

    For instance, in the past h********l couples were stigmatised and seen as immoral, but in today's society they have gained legal rights that resemble those of heterosexual couples (marriage, adoption and cohabiting). The changes to the law surrounding r**e within marriage was established in R v R, this case recognised

  2. Law and Morals

    This has led Michael Allen to argue that what criminal law considers as wrong is built on 'the fundamental values upon which a society is founded'. However, 'fundamental values' such as contraception and adultery have no basis in law. This is likely to be because secular considerations have become influential on the law.

  1. Judical Creativity in Law

    They have the flexibility to refuse to follow an earlier case "when it appears right to do so", thus extending the power of the Law Lords (at least in theory) to create law. Though it is not used often it can have a major effect throughout the legal system e.g.

  2. Free essay

    Examine the relationship between law and morals. Consider the extent to which the law ...

    may try and persuade or even rebuke people that don't follow 'the trend', possible resulting in complete social breakdown. Morality differs from person to person, from one social group to another and changes with time. For example attitudes towards single parents used to be very negative whereas nowadays it seems commonplace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work