• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How powerful is the Prime Minister?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Claudia Clifton How powerful is the prime minister? Lord Oxford once judged that, ?The office of prime minster is what its holder chooses and is able to make of it.? This idea is best explained by Crossman?s prime ministerial government model. This is the theory that: since the development of disciplined political parties and, certainly over the past fifty years; PMs have become more powerful and dominant because party loyalty focuses primarily on them as the leader. This is due to the PM being both the head of the civil service and leader of the largest party in the commons. However, there are also factors that constrain the amount of power a PM can wield and for over half a century there has been discussion over whether Britain has a ?government by prime minister.? This is due to the idea by some, that the PM is a ?primus inter pares,? first among equals. This term refers to the fact that while the PM is ?first? in name, he or she still remains ?equal? to the rest of their government. In this sense, Smith?s argument that the PM is constrained by a complex web of relationships in which he must function applies, this is also known as the Cabinet government model. However, to really examine how powerful the PM is, we must also look at the structural explanations as well as the theoretical ones. ...read more.

Middle

All of these elements of her leadership led to Hennessey to detail that she ruled her cabinet with an iron hand. This domination of her cabinet lends her style of leadership to the prime ministerial model. Furthermore, a PM may dominate their cabinet by bypassing in completely. A prime example of this was when Blair didn?t consult with or listen to his cabinet over the building of the Millennium Dome and more importantly the Iraq War. Moreover, the PM also has the power to choose the secretary who takes notes at cabinet meetings, and is able to use this to their advantage. Thatcher, for example, sometimes eliminated the opposition to her policies from cabinet meetings and then claimed that her entire cabinet had agreed on said policy. Therefore, it?s quite simple for the PM to bypass their cabinet. Alternatively, rather than bypass the principle of meeting with ministers completely, a PM may consult with a single minister or small group through the use of bilaterals or kitchen cabinets. Although, this does mean that the cabinet is consulted with much less frequently. This method was popularised by Blair, who was well known for his use of bilaterals and credited with the creation of the kitchen cabinet, so called because he would hold meetings with his ministers in his kitchen. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, ?bad? news stories can leave a PM?s reputation in tatters. For instance, the ?cash for Cameron? scandal which significantly weakened the Conservative?s popularity in the polls, lessening the public?s confidence in Cameron as a leader. Moreover, Cameron?s seemingly unpopular position on press regulation and the BSKYB revelation has somewhat reduced Cameron?s public standing. To conclude, the question of how powerful a PM is, in my opinion, really depends on which PM we?re talking about because I believe that this kind of power is immeasurable on such a generalised basis. However, if I had to comment on our current PM, David Cameron, I would say that I don?t think he wields as much power as former transformative PM?s such as Thatcher and Blair did. This is due to the coalitional nature of his administration which is bound by the coalition agreement that insists on frequent deference over decisions between himself and the deputy PM Nick Clegg. As well as, the necessity for longer cabinet meetings to ensure compromise and a sense of complacency within the core executive, means Cameron?s model of government certainly leans itself toward a more cabinet style of leadership and this seems fitting as Cameron declared before the last general election that he ?wanted a more collective style of policy making and decision taking, building a strong team and trusting his colleagues to get on with the job.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Leadership styles

    3 star(s)

    However, its application in the field of public service work is slightly more problematic and the drawbacks are seen as follows: * Democratic discussion takes time. A public service may have to respond very quickly, so gathering the views of all team members may not be a viable option.

  2. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    Yet in those countries the president is elected by direct universal suffrage, giving these figures the legitimacy to speak for, and to, the nation. Both US President George W Bush and French President Jacques Chirac are commanders-in-chief of their respective countries' armed forces.

  1. To what extent does the prime minister dominate the UK political system?

    The minutes of this meeting were leaked, showing that the Government lost ´┐Ż750m on the Dome. Another incident in 1999 showed Blair's press secretary Alistair Campbell telling the press that the electoral system for EU elections would be changing, before the cabinet had decided.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    o The UK is a parliamentary democracy- In that Parliament is the central democratic institution, operating as a deliberative (what does this mean) assembly which establishes an indirect link between government & the people (explain how this happens). Parliament ensures that government is accountable to the people (exactly how does

  1. The relationship between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Declaring War on Iraq two weeks ago, albeit with a majority of the Commons behind him, showed that his power was incredibly strong and the possibility that he may have gone to War using the prerogative, even with the support of Parliament confirmed this strength.

  2. priministers power

    The premier also has to think ahead. He must bring on younger ministers to ensure an adequate pool of experienced colleagues for the future. o There are also restraints on the ability of a Prime Minister to dismiss ministers. Dismissal is a two-edged weapon. Any sacked minister colleague is a potential focus for backbench dissent.

  1. To what extent does the Prime Minister dominate the political system in the UK?

    The prime minister is also able to appoint people outside of government, for example he has the final say on the chairman of the BBC, and the prime minister also has some control over the appointment of new members into the House of Lords.

  2. To What Extent Does The British Prime Minister Dominate The Political System In The ...

    100 years as a way of enhancing that a new prime minister meant a new government. However, though the PM may have the 'power' of patronage, there are ways in which ministers can find the 'loop hole' as Brown did as Chancellor to Blair.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work