• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain reform its electoral system for general elections?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Should Britain reform its electoral system for general elections? There are various things within our society that make our country democratic, one being free and open elections enabling us to choose representation within parliament. The current electoral system that we have in Great Britain, the simple majority in single member constituencies, (or the first past the post system), has left critics to suggest that our country is far from the democratic ideal that we so like to believe. What will therefore be analysed are the merits for our current electoral system, and the disadvantages that make other electoral systems seem more appealing. One of the reasons for why the British electoral system should not be reformed is because First Past the Post ensures a stable government as the system favours larger parties. This is shown in the 1979 election where the Tories won by a landslide of 43.9% votes and Thatcher was able to carry out all her policies with ease since she had a majority in the House of Commons. It is usually that a single party forms government, and this is due to the fact that since single party governments are stable and cohesive, and they are generally able to survive for a full term in office. ...read more.


This happened in 1951 when the Tories formed a majority government but won fewer seats than Labour. In February 1974 the tables turned, with Labour forming a minority government but with fewer votes than the Conservatives. Another reason for why the electoral system should be reformed is because of systematic bias. The disproportionality isn?t random; certain parties do well in the elections while others suffer. One of the examples of bias is the size of the party, large parties benefit at the expense of small parties and this happens because the ?winner takes all?. This means that 100% of representation gained in each constituency is done by a single candidate, and therefore by a single party. Plus, the winning candidates tend to come from large parties, as these are parties whose candidates are most likely to be ?first past the post? in the sense of plurality support. But for candidates from smaller parties than come for instance, fourth in the election, win nothing and gain no representation for their party. And voters are discouraged from supporting smaller parties because they know that they are unlikely to win any seats (The Greens, UKIP, BNP for example) ...read more.


It can lead to adversarial politics or the domination of one party. It creates a large number of safe seats, which means that many votes are wasted. There is a limited voter choice and voters cannot choose between candidates of the same party. Votes in Constituency's are not of equal value because it depends on whether it is a safe or marginal seat. Representation is disproportionate because some constituencies are larger than others. There are also reasons against electoral reform such as clear electoral choice. First past the post aids democracy because it clarifies the choices available to votes. It offers voters a clear and simple choice between potential parties of government, each committed to a different policy. First past the post also established a strong and reliable link between a representative and his or her constituency. In first past the post voters get what they vote for and winning parties have the ability to carry out their manifesto promises. First past the post also ensures that governments can govern. Coalition governments are wear and fairly ineffective because they have to seek legislative support by two or more parties. Single party governments are stable and cohesive and so are generally more able to survive for a full term in office. This is because the government is united by ideological loyalties whilst coalition governments are often wek and unstable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Should the UK reform the Electoral System used for General Elections

    The other main proportional system is the Single Transferable Vote system which includes voters ranking candidates in order of preference and then seats are allocated according to a quota system which is determined by a formula (Votes/Seats+1)+1. If the quota is met then this candidate's surplus votes are redistributed to

  2. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    How did I refine draft copies to meet the purpose more closely My first draft had no record sales figure image, which was supposed to be on this newsletter. I looked to rectify this, which meant I had to edit my artist information page.

  1. Would British Political Parties Benefit From A Different Electoral System?

    The group Conservative Action for Electoral Reform (CAER) would like to see the current system changed to STV. They argue that preferential voting in multi-member constituencies would provide proportional representation whilst giving the voter a wider range of candidates to choose from.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    Is the negative media justified, and is it doing a good job? Although the amount of negative press that the government, and specific MPs in general get is noticeably high, the question as to whether they deserve it to be publicized in this way is very relevant.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the British Electoral System as used inThe General ...

    Another flaw related to this is that the first past the post system is not proportional. So the number of votes cast for a party does not reflect the number of seats they gain in the House of Commons. So, once again the views of the people have not been taken into account.

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    in England, which means that compared to England, they are overrepresented and therefore in a union with England they would feel underrepresented. These inequalities in constituencies mean that all of the electorate's votes are not equal. A voter in a smaller constituency has much more say in who gets elected

  1. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    This is true in the sense that they also believe that the constitution should be allowed to evolve naturally, instead of being dictated by predecessors. The Labour party also argue that introducing a codified constitution would be very time consuming and very costly.

  2. The case Against Electoral Reform

    AV on its own, because it makes use exclusively of single-member constituencies, would fail to address several of the more significant defects of FPTP. In particular, there would still be large tracts of the country which would be electoral deserts for major parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work