• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the invasion of Iraq so controversial?

Free essay example:

Long Answer Question

Why was Iraq so controversial?

        The Iraq context began in 2002 when the United Nations (U.N.) security council of 15 states unanimously supported Iraq’s disarmament as an obligation and required a U.N. weapons inspection of Baghdad but was not explicitly in favour of military action. The United States of America (U.S.A.) Sectary of State Colin Powell presented evidence to the U.N. supporting Iraq possessions of Weapons of Mass Destruction (W.M.D.). In the United Kingdom (U.K.), Blair’s Parliament House of Commons statement identifies the threat of Iraq as existing and potentially active within 45 minutes. Chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix monitors Iraq weapons supplies January 2003, and there was no clear evidence of W.M.D. found. Blix requested more time for further inspection that was supported by Russia, France and Germany, but the U.S. indicate intention to begin military action March 2003.

        Due to this, there was a division of attitudes internationally and nationally about Iraq, the U.N. permanent members of the Security Council known as the “P.5” were split. The U.S.A. commencement of military action, supported by the U.K. preceded a second U.N. resolution as it took place before the U.N. concluded its view on W.M.D., thus other P.5 members were unwilling to support military action prior to Blix’s assessment, and Blix’s team were unable to finish their inspection. Consequently a major split in international opinion was established by U.S.A. and U.K. with Spain at first for the invasion and Germany, France, Russia, China with Spain coming later were against it.

        Therefore, in clear contrast to the U.N. consensus against Iraq in 1990/91, great powers and medium European Union (E.U.) powers were very divided about the U.S. led campaign. Between 2003 and 2007, Bush and Blair strongly justified their decision of removing Saddam Hussein, even when W.M.D. was not found post invasion. In the UK, the Conservative opposition also supported the war along with the Labour led Government.

        The main opponents were President Chirac of France and Zapatero of Spain were notable heads of government which criticised the conflict as both illegal and counterproductive for stability in the region as it was likely to cause a long and high fatality war. In addition, within states, notably in the U.S.A. and U.K publicly opposed, the then Senator Obama and the Liberal Democrats respectively. Therefore, the Iraq issue caused intra and inter-state disagreement and international dispute, especially in the U.K. where there were “Stop the war” protests organised, and the Leader of the House of Commons, Robin Cook resigned from the cabinet in 2003.

        In conclusion, after coalition forces intervened, the internal situation became unstable for a prolonged period, Saddam Hussein was captured and later executed by the new Iraq government but security for Iraq citizens greatly deteriorated, there was a number car bombs and inter-community violence escalated. Therefore a new democracy without adequate safety is of questionable value, this post-invasion chaos and no discovery of W.M.D. which was the main justification for war that caused much criticism of the “Bush-Blair policy” after 2003. Specific to the U.K., Blair’s “45 minute” warning caused a major row between the government and British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). This related to how accurately the government had presented intelligence information in 2002 until early 2003. In 2011 senior U.K. generals suggested the intelligence dossier from the government was one-sided, to ‘make the case’ for war.

        Internationally, in the U.S.A. presidential campaign of 2008, candidates Clinton and Obama publicly disagreed about the U.S.A. policy as both senators had voted on opposite sides for and against invasion respectively. Furthermore, in 2011, the 2003 Iraq conflict remains hotly disputed as Bush and Blair stand by their decision to remove a dictator while other opinions consider the policy as a failure and an illegal war. In the U.K. there is on-going inquiry into the start of the war that is due to publish its findings in late 2011.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. UN and Iraq: The Weakest Coalition

    (Mingst and Karns 2004). What makes Iraq different? Liberals will argue that human nature is inherently good and can improve its conditions of existence; through collective social instruction and reform, the states injustice and aggression can be mitigated. However, looking at the span of the entire US- Iraqi War, not

  2. Israel's Security Barrier

    The article mentioned above clearly states that the occupying power shall not introduce any changes that will affect the people living on the occupied territory. By building a fence, however, the social or economic lives of the Palestinians will be affected tremendously.

  1. Assess the relationship between the US and Iraq from 1970 to the present day.

    It was then that the US policy reversed, and as a result of human rights atrocities that had occurred against the Kurds, there was talk of supporting them. The US was giving Saddam mixed messages of its policies, and when the US weren't praising him for holding off Iran, he

  2. The Geography and History of Iraq.

    Iraq planned a terrorist attack and later attacked United States in September 2001. This has been causing quarrels between the two countries up to date. U.S government prepared to attack Iraq, although people who took part in the first Gulf War II were against it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work