Supply Chain Management - Review of the Child Protective Services Investigation Process

Authors Avatar

Supply Chain Management

 

 

Supply Chain Management

Review of the Child Protective Services Investigation Process

Yoshiko Moss

MGT 554

August 25, 2004

Goutam Sinha


ABSTRUCT

In the beginning of 2004, the tragic death of a young boy in San Antonio, TX raised concerns about Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services’ (TDPRS) procedures relating to the investigation of the child protective services (CPS) process, including responding to telephone reports and assessing the risk of maltreatment accurately.  TDPRS is currently under investigation ordered by the Governor, Rick Perry.  The Governor stated, “there is enough evidence from various parts of the state to suggest that some of our most vulnerable children are not receiving the protection they need from abusive situations.  The evidence leads me to believe we have a systemic breakdown in the safety net that must protect abused children”  (  July 1, 2004).  This paper examines current procedures in the investigation process and provides recommendations for improvement related to several of the details and feature of the operations process.  “Reinventing government” initiatives draw heavily on supply chain management, total quality management, business process reengineering, and just-in-time delivery – concepts that fall under the Operations Management umbrella.(Chase, 2003).  Because this review is narrowly focused on the CPS investigation process, there are several essential elements of child welfare services that are not addressed in this paper, including substitute care and permanency services.  


OVERVIEW OF FUNCTIONAL AREAS

The overall goal of CPS is to protect the unprotected children from abuse and neglect.  This report focuses on specific CPS functions and crosscutting themes.  These functions are those that comprise the child protection response to allegations of abuse and neglect.  Operational definitions described in this report include:

  • Screening and Intake – the process by which CPS receives a referral and a report concerning allegations of child abuse or neglect, and decides whether or not to respond to the referral and report.  
  • Investigation – the process by which CPS determines whether child maltreatment has occurred or if a child is at risk of maltreatment, and the decisions and actions that are needed to ensure the child’s safety.
  • Other CPS Response and Alternative Response – a response to an allegation of abuse or neglect that assesses the needs of the child or family with or without requiring a determination that maltreatment has occurred or that the child is at risk of maltreatment for the purpose of providing the family with services.  

For each function, there are several different features.  The workflow of these functions is described in Table 1.

SCREENING AND INTAKE

Receiving community referrals, which includes those from mandated professional reporters and the population at large, is the gateway to CPS.  Features of the intake procedures include the availability to receive reports, methods for documenting reports, and timeframes for accepting and forwarding a report.  Intake is available 24-hours a day 7 days a week, and centralized in Austin, TX.  Referred reports are generally categorized into two groups.  In the first group, CPS caseworkers are dispatched immediately for children believed to be in imminent risk of harm.  In the second group, investigations are usually initiated within 10 days.  The policies indicate that a decision protocol for forwarding cases for investigation.  The hotline workers conduct quality assurance (QA) reviews on each case and decision to forward a case to investigation is made with supervisor approval.  In case of sexual abuse and serious abuse, the case must be notified to law enforcement.

Join now!

INVESTIGATION

The investigation function addresses the process of determining whether a child has been maltreated or is likely to be maltreated, and if services are needed to ensure the child will not be harmed in the future.  TDPRS implemented the use of risk and safety assessment (IRA) as tools to guide decision-making as to when and how to intervene to keep children safe in the immediate future and to reduce long-term risk.  The result of IRA was included at case closure, during case planning at any major decision point, or whenever circumstances suggest a child’s safety is at risk.  Investigators ...

This is a preview of the whole essay