A view from the bridge

Authors Avatar

                                                                Sunday 11th January 2009

Literature Coursework

A View From The Bridge

By Jana Hannoun

10C

In a View From The Bridge, Miller gave considerable thought to the elements of Greek Tragedy. In his essay on social plays, Arthur Miller describes the virtues of Greek drama “for when the Greeks thought of the right ways to live it was a whole concept.” What modern drama lacked, wrote Miller, was a sense of the whole man or whole good. This was exemplified by his own behavior during the McCarthy trials, where he refused to name the names of the artists who attended communist support meetings. Miller sought to find the right ultimate law that extended beyond that of the written word. A view from the bridge tries to address this same issue.

 In the introduction to the play, Miller identified the difficulties of writing a drama that combined the concept of ultimate law with modern living and knowledge. Alfieri was Miller’s original solution to these problems. As the narrator, Alfieri objectively observes the Carbone family and articulates the larger, universal meaning and context of Eddie’s actions and family conflict. The most visible elements of a Greek Tragedy in this play are Alfieri as a chorus and Eddie as a Euripidean tragic hero – overcome and finally broken by his own self destructive madness. Eddie is weak and powerless in the face of fate.

Arthur Miller wrote the play in the late 1940s after World War II when Italy had switched sides from Hitler to Britain and so Germany pounded Italy and left the Italian economy in ruins. With few jobs at home many Italians looked to America for work. They left their home country and worked in America, many as illegal immigrants just like Rodolfo and Marco, hoping for a better life. The play is set against such a group of Italian émigrés, in Brooklyn, New York.

Miller has used a number of dramatic techniques to build tension and integrate the audience into part of the play. The ones I would like to discuss are; the structure of the play in episodes and interludes, the role of Alfieri as narrator and actor and the action as shown in stage directions, the set and other properties such as sound and lighting. He also uses language of the dialogue and symbolism.

Starting with the last first, Alfieri is the symbolic bridge between American law and Italian tradition. Alfieri, an Italian-American lawyer, is true to his ethnic identity. The play is told from the viewpoint of Alfieri, who attempts to objectively give a picture of Eddie Carbone and the 1950s Red Hook, Brooklyn community. Alfieri represents the interchange, embodied in the Brooklyn Bridge, from small ethnic communities filled with dock laborers to the disparate cosmopolitan wealth and intellectualism of Manhattan. The old and new worlds are codified in the immigrant-son Alfieri. He attempts to present an un-biased and reasonable view of the events of the play and make clear the greater social and moral implications in the work. He is for all intents and purposes Miller's mouth piece. The set, as well as accommodating the action, is symbolic of Eddie's world and values: the apartment (home, where the family is,) the street (the wider community, where he meets friends) and his office (where he works and where most of the action in the play happens.)  

Join now!

The structure of the play is quite simple. Miller used the two acts to mark a division in Eddie's story: in the first act, he tries to keep Catherine from falling in love with Rodolpho. In the second, he finds he has failed in this, and first throws Rodolpho out of the house, then tries to have him deported as an illegal immigrant, which provokes the fatal confrontation with Marco, as Eddie tries to recover his name. Within each act are clear episodes, five in each with interludes of comment and narration from Alfieri which mark where each begins and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay