In Macbeth we learn about the difference between a true and gracious king and an ambitious usurper

Authors Avatar

In Macbeth we learn about the difference between a true and gracious king and an ambitious usurper.’ Discuss

Shakespeare’s Macbeth was set in the time of Edward the Confessor, shortly before the Battle of Hastings. It was wrote, however, when King James I was ruling, and was said that it was even written for him, as he had a fascination with witchcraft. What we now call as the ‘Great Chain of Being’ was a common belief back then, where God was the supreme ruler, aided by his angels, and that he chose who were to be his representatives on earth, starting with the kings and queens. The order then descended to thanes and nobles, barons and all the way down to peasants, and then on to animals.

This was considered almost law, that everyone, no matter how rich or poor, had their place in the order and to try and move up or down would cause chaos, which was exactly what Macbeth tried to do.

When Macbeth killed Duncan, he committed regicide and in doing so broke the chain, disrupting the ‘Great Chain of Being’.

In the play, Duncan is portrayed as the just and noble king, where as when Macbeth becomes king, he is portrayed as the exact opposite of Duncan, a tyrant who drags Scotland into chaos.

Join now!

When Duncan in murdered in Macbeth’s own castle, Macduff says:

‘Confusion now has made his masterpiece!

Most sacrilegious murder hath broke ope

The Lord’s anointed temple’

Here Macduff is referring to Duncan as a “temple of God”, and indeed in the ‘Great Chain of Being’ this is the case because God is meant to be the ruler-in-chief and kings and queens are meant to be his delegates on earth, so by calling Duncan ‘the Lord’s anointed temple’ is confirming that Duncan is God’s chosen person and therefore he is the worthy king. Macduff is also suggesting that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay