After the election, Ralph decides to go on an expedition to explore the island, and find out if it is really an island. He chooses Jack to accompany him, Ralph probably wants to find out about Jack, and if he is a threat to his leadership. Ralph also chooses Simon to go on the expedition, he chooses Simon for a number of reasons; he wants to access how much of a threat Jack is to his leadership, so by choosing Simon he can find out what sort of leader Jack is and how he treats Simon. He may also choose Simon, as at this point in the story is a rather impartial character, who, will let Ralph and Jack go on the expedition without interference. He also chose Simon, despite seeing him faint not long before, maybe he choose Simon to give himself a better chance of looking successful. Maybe he chose Jack and Simon, because he wanted to gauge Jacks physical strength against his own, using Simon as a benchmark as he had already seen his physical weakness. If this is true then he did not choose Piggy who desperately wanted to go, because he cared for him, despite treating him to the contrary.“ A kind of glamour was spread over them and the scene, and they were conscious of the glamour, and made happy by it.” This shows that they were seen as explorers, and just by going, the other children’s opinions of them had changed, maybe it was a mistake choosing Jack to go with him.
During the expedition Simons spiritual side is first explored, when the three boys see a plant that has bud that resemble candles simon is fascinated, “Like candles, candle bushes, candle buds!” This shows Simons appreciation of natural beauty, and the candles resemble his background in the choir, which he has respect, and curiousness for. Jack on the other hand shows contempt, and is violent towards the plant, “the enormity of the downwards stroke’, it shows that he resents his Choir backgrounds, and exploits it for power as the head choir boy. Ralph shows little imagination, dismissing the candle buds; this shows his lack of imagination. Later in the chapter, the boys see a pig, and Jack is not able to kill, it due to his macrocosm values, he is still humane and has not yet descended into savagery, although he wants to, as it would make him look powerful. Although Simon is in this scene, he is not involved with the pig incident, keeping his innocent record.
Simon does not view the beast like the other boys on the island; he uses his spiritual side, to explore the possibilities. Not assuming it exists, and must, be killed or that it definitely cannot exist like Ralph or Piggy, he takes the view that maybe it does exist, but the beast is in them. In chapter three; Simon’s behaviour is seen by the other boys as increasingly odd, as he goes into the woods, on his own at nights and doesn’t mind being by himself. The beast does not scare him. This is because of his strong personality, and spiritual side. Simon has a deep understanding concerning the beast but is not able to put his ideas and emotions into words, so Golding provides them.
The first real act of evil on the island occurs when Simon is sitting alone in the forest and he witnesses the killing of the sow. Simon realizes that this is the first real act of evil on the island, especially when the head gets placed on stick, as a “gift” for the beast, therefore idolizing it!
Simon is the only boy on the island who discovers what the Beast truly is. In an epileptic fit he dreams he is talking to the head, whom he calls ‘The Lord of The Flies’ in this conversation the pigs head tries to tempt Simon into joining Ralph and Jack in their feast of the sow, “they think your batty” the beast tries to persuade Simon by criticising him. When Simon awakes he decides he has to confront the beast, this will help him conquer his fears. By now the others are almost worshiping the beast. As Simon approaches the “beast” he discovers it is a parachutists rotting body, being moved by the parachute swaying in the wind. At first he feels sympathy for the parachutist and frees him from the parachute. When he tries to tell the rest of the children he is mistaken as the Beast and beaten to death. This is one of the reasons that Simon is often seen as a Christ figure in the novel.
Golding portrays the death of Simon as a beautiful thing, surrounded by “strange moon beam bodied creatures with fiery eyes” These small creatures resemble tiny angles carrying Simon away, signifying Simons religious importance to the novel. As Simon drifts out to sea, Golding changes the scene from the island to the whole world, the sun and the moon, circling forever. This signifies two things; firstly that Simons death has a universal importance in a macrocosm much wider than the island. I think he is also trying to show that the world is in many ways like the island, a microcosm in a much larger macrocosm, and whatever destruction and suffering is caused, it is insignificant compared to what is happening in the larger Macrocosm.
After Simons death, the island quickly descends into savagery, this is why Simon is seen to represent goodness and fairness, with his death come the death of democracy and all ‘humanitarian’ ideas and principles. When Simon leaves the island there is no one left to challenge evil. By this time Roger is symbolizing the increasing evil on the island. Jack and his tribe decide that they have killed the beast with Simons death, although Jack still seems to want is, as if he is dependant on the beast. I feel this is because his power is based around fear, and the beast provides that fear. This brings Ralph and Piggy into conflict with the ‘tribe’ resulting in Piggy’s violent death and tribe hunting Ralph.
At the end of the novel, the boys set the island on fire, destroying everything, and at the last moment an Army officer lands on the island, this is a ‘dues ex machiener’, which was used in old plays; when the world was in chaos and every one is about to die, an almighty thing (often a god) comes and fixes everything. Goldings point is with this is that this wouldn’t happen in real life, and that we have or own fate in our hands
In conclusion I can say that Simon is a very important character in Lord of the flies because the novel is an allegory, each character signifies an important idea. I think Simon represents natural human goodness (which is killed off with Simons death, and the completion of the boys turning into savages), Ralph represents order, leadership, and civilization, democracy (which is ended with the smashing of the conch, and Ralph’s downfall as leader); Piggy represents the scientific and intellectual aspects of civilization; Jack represents savagery and the desire for power; and Roger represents brutality and bloodlust and the desire for evil. Unlike the other kids on the island Simon acts morally not out of guilt or shame, but because he believes in its inherent value. He behaves kindly toward the younger children, and he is the first to realize the problem posed by the beast and the Lord of the Flies and, that the monster on the island is not some physical beast, but rather a savagery that lurks within each person. This idea finds representation in the sow's head and eventually stands as the moral conclusion of the novel. The main problem of the book is the idea of inherent human evil, and mans essential illness. Against this, Simon seems to represent an idea of essential human goodness. Yet his brutal murder by the other boys indicates the scarcity of that goodness amid an overwhelming abundance of evil.
