• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain your Answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain your Answer. The monarchy, referring predominantly to Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were in part responsible for their downfall - the decision of the constitution to abolish the monarchy in 1792. Although as monarchs, Louis and Marie Antoinette made very poor decisions the monarchy's stability was dubious before they came to power. Louis inherited a country with intrinsic problems, which he did not have the ability to solve. There is no doubt that the characters of Louis and Marie Antoinette were unsuitable for governing a country and thus contributed to their downfall; however how far can they be blamed for the inherent shortcomings that led to their failure. Louis was pathologically shy and impressionable, not qualities that inspire confidence in a leader. Louis XIV died suddenly without having finished Louis XVI education; he was ill prepared to deal with a country with complex structural problems. France needed a strong and united monarchy to overcome its problems however Louis and Marie Antoinette were neither. Louis and Marie Antoinette were very young when they came to power and neither possessed the traditional qualities of monarchs. Louis was a reluctant leader, who relied heavily on his ministers, 'Timidity and mistrust of himself were at the centre of his character; and it was soon recognised that, if her were not to be guided by his own inclinations, others could succeed by skill and perseverance in influencing his decisions.'1 Although their marriage was intended to secure the relations between France and Austria, Marie Antoinette was subject to great hostility. ...read more.

Middle

Brienne was appointed in 1787 and attempted to pass a modified reform plan by the Assembly of Notables however the plan is again rejected. The King dismissed the Assembly and in June 1787 started to introduce reforms without their support, people resented the King's despotic actions. The Paris parlement opposed these reforms and demand that the Estate General, which had last been called in 1614, be summoned to approve new taxes. Louis ignored their opposition and on 6th August 1787 used a Lis de Justice to enact new taxes, the parlement say they will not recognise the King's Lis de Justice without approval of the Estates General, undermining the Kings authority; a debate of what role privilege should play becomes a political question of Louis's authority. In an attempt to remove opposition, on 14th August 1787, the King exiled the Paris parlement to Troyes, politically emasculating them, showing his inability to deal with the situation. As the feud continued loans became increasingly expensive and support for the parlement grew. In late 1787 the Paris Parlement started to assert its power, in an attempt to suppress their influence, the parlement's powers were stripped on 8th May 1788. The May Edicts saw much opposition and the cry for the Estates General spread across the country, Brienne realized it was impossible to resist the public demand for the Estates General and on July 5th, 1788, Louis XVI promised to summon them. The calling of the Estates General to seek approval of law changes saw the real demise of the King's power; he no longer had absolute power, he required approval from the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Brunswick Manifesto issued by the Prussian army threatened revolutionaries, although designed to help the King it reopened the issue of separation between the monarchy and the people; the idea of declaring war was to reunite the people and the King however the Brunswick Manifesto declared war on the revolution not the France. In the Summer 1792 the war was going badly for France and it seemed as if the revolution would be crushed, however at the Battle of Valmy the Austrian's were defeated, restoring faith in France but not in the King, contrary to Louis's hopes. The failure of the Absolute monarchy was largely due to intrinsic problems that were present before Louis's reign and the monarchy's lack of skill to deal with them, however the enlightenment contributed to its failure and the monarchy could not be held responsible for the deleterious impact. The constitutional monarchy largely failed because of Louis's unwillingness to compromise, Marie Antoinette's unhelpful roll and growing radicalism that Louis could have no. Louis and Marie Antoinette wore a great deal of responsibility for their own downfall; however there were factors that they could have had no influence over. 1 Quoted in The French Revolution- Documents and debates, L.W. Cowie, London, 1987, pg 7 2 Niall Ferguson, The cash Nexus, Money and Power in the Modern World, London, 2001, pg 15-16 3 Dennis Diderot, Encyclop�die, ou Dictionaire raisonn� des sciences, des arts et de m�tiers 4 Quoted in Merrick : The Desacralisation of the French Monarchy in the Eighteenth Century 5 The abb� Siey�s, What is the Third Estate? Pamphlet, 1789 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is ...

    not like this, then laud tries to reform the church when Charles knows that the country is protestant, then why does he try to turn it catholic. Charles makes a huge blunder in 1637 because he tries to enforce a new English prayer book on Scotland.

  2. Was the fall of the Bastille the most significant event of 1789?

    The patience of the 3rd estates eventually ran out. This is important because the National Assembly created a direct opposition to the king and his autocratic rule. The tennis court oath also played a big part in 1789. It showed that the king was finally losing control.

  1. Just like previous attempts to bring peace to Northern Ireland, the Good Friday Agreement ...

    The next development was on the 28th July 2005 when the IRA announced that it had formally abandoned its armed campaigned. It also promises to resume disarmament and pursue its aims through politics. The decommissioning was overall a little success because they dismantled two major weapon towers and also got

  2. The Suez Crisis

    Nasser could be a very honest, kind person and then Britain would be humiliated by Eden's strong opinion. Source B shows the public love for Nasser which agrees with the view. It suggests Britain was humiliated by Eden because you can tell the Egyptians love him and he isn't what Eden made him out to be.

  1. My main question is : How did Mussolini rise to power in ...

    was born. Eventually everyone thought that his Fasci would be a failure. Because of the elections in 1919, none of the applicants won a single seat in the parliament. By the end of 1919, Mussolini received hardly more than 2% of the votes in Milan, less than 5000 votes against 170,000 for the Socialists.

  2. How far is the 1932 revolution in Thailand a revolution?

    9The drastic change of power in the 1932 Revolution makes it a revolution as the sudden change of power is one of the principles of revolutions. However there is some evidence indicates this event in 1932 not a revolution. One is the absence of mass participation.

  1. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    CONCLUSION SOURCES A The sources are all very useful because they provide a perspective as to how people felt ? particularly the black population ? and therefore provide a baseline to distinguish between the quality of life of different races.

  2. Causes of the French Revolution

    The reason economic needs is an individual cause in this piece is due to its great significance and its vitality in causing a revolution. If thought about and analyzed, people would realize that most of this misery is caused by financial incapability; some may not have enough money for medical

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work