• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of the 1920s because of his cunning and ruthlessness. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Stalin was able to obtain the total power of the USSR by the end of the 1920s because of his cunning and ruthlessness. Do you agree on this statement? Explain. Stalin is undoubtedly a cunning and ruthless person, which we can see from how he presented himself as ?Mr. Average?, how he made use of the character and mistake of Trotsky, his main rival, to marginalize him in the Party, how he made use of the division over policy in the Politburo to manipulate the members and how he used his job to achieve a support base and at the same time weaken Trotsky?s, but whether he succeeded because of his character rather than other factors needs some exploration. Firstly, after Lenin?s death, he was the one to organize the funeral. This was nothing surprising as he was the General Secretary and it was his responsibility to organize it. But he did it in a way the he could benefit from it, which showed his cunning and the fact that he was an opportunist. Not only did he make the funeral as lavish as possible in merely three days to show that he cared and respected Lenin very much and hence raise his profile, he also lied to Trotsky about the date of the funeral, and so Trotsky could not get to Petrograd in time and missed the funeral, making him appear that he didn?t care about Lenin. By this, Stalin could strike a contrast between him and Trotsky and therefore present himself as the true friend and heir of Lenin. ...read more.

Middle

No sensible politician would resign from his most important post in a situation like that, because it was apparently exactly what his opponent wanted him to do. Although Stalin was incredibly cunning to think of this strategy, but Trotsky should have realised that it was his trick and therefore should not have resigned. This also proved that Lenin?s comment about Stalin was correct. In his Testament, he said that Stalin was likely to misuse his power and should be gotten rid of immediately. In the end, Stalin did abuse his power from his job for his own benefits. Yet, even though Lenin was like a God to the Party members, Stalin managed to survive his Testament because of the support of Kamenev and Zinoviev. They persuaded the Party members that Lenin?s comment about Stalin was groundless, that they worked with him in perfect harmony during the period when Lenin was very ill. They only supported Stalin because, firstly, it was the only chance for them to continue ruling the party, as they did in the triumvirate. They also knew that if Trotsky got power, he would be even more dogmatic than Lenin, and they wouldn?t even have a chance to speak, as Trotsky never listened or showed respect to anyone but Lenin in the meetings. When other members talked, he would either read a book or sleep, showing absolutely no respect for them. Moreover, they thought that even if Stalin got power, he was more likely to be a leader that would listen to other people and work together. Therefore not only did they save Stalin out of the mud, they also stopped the Testament from being published, so as not to further embarrass Stalin, so the majority of Russian people did not know what Lenin really think of Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

In my opinion, the most important reason was the mistakes made by Trotsky himself because of his character. It was Trotsky losing it rather than Stalin winning it. It is because firstly, in terms of personal charm and intellectuality, Stalin was nowhere as outstanding as Trotsky. He was a poor speaker, he did not have clear views or directions and he did not have any major contributions to the Party. On the other hand, Trotsky was totally opposite of him. He was a charming leader, intellectual and an excellent orator. No matter how cunning Stalin was, if Trotsky was less arrogant, respected other people and was less dogmatic on issues that he believed were right, he would still be far more popular than Stalin as he was so intellectual and had made so many contributions to the Party, as people usually follow classic leaders unless their strong character twisted into threat, then people would turn to mediocre leaders who provide more sense of safety and are believed to be easier to work with. Secondly, although Stalin was very cunning and tricked Trotsky several times, an intelligent man like Trotsky should not have fallen into the traps if he was more alert and did not assume that everyone would just accept him as the leader. Had he regarded Stalin as his rival, he would at least be more careful on everything he does and act less rashly, for example thinking twice before resigning from the post of Commissar of War. He would also probably have done something to secure his popularity, for example building his support base in the Central Committee and trying to side with Kamenev and Zinoviev, who he shared the same political view to prevent himself being marginalised. In that case, Stalin?s cunning and ruthlessness would not have worked. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    industrial goods so worker often found themselves in very harsh working conditions, due to raise of production of industrial goods most shops were left empty and most clothes stores were in short supply and many household time weren't available, and also because of the huge influx of people to cities

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    The source claims that had Stalin not used terror, then people would have noticed what a bad leader he was. The sources are both different in the way they examine Stalin, source L shows Stalin to be a good politician regardless of his evil side.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    The Army was hit hard with 25,000 officers removed (around one in five) including the Supreme Commander of the Red Army, Marshall Tukhachevsky. This had major repercussions on Russia's military performance when Hitler invaded as Stalin had successfully rooted out all independent thinkers.

  2. The return of Lenin

    * Kerensky had sent out punishment brigades to try to stop the land seizures, but this only made the peasants hate the provisional Government more. * Soldiers were deserting the army in their thousands, trying to get back to their village and get share of thee land.

  1. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    This created overpopulation and made the food shortages worse. With food prices and unemployment rising and wages staying the same, the people of Russia were dying of starvation. The war caused even more despair when news from the front reached the city telling of Russian defeats and many deaths.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    This source is biased as it is based on how Bukharin saw Stalin, and as they did not get on with one another it is likely that Bukharin is attempting to make Stalin seem like an evil unforgiving person. The person who wrote the speech in source E is clearly a supporter of Stalin for a variety of different reasons.

  1. The Outcome of the power struggle owes more to the weakness of Trotsky than ...

    Stalin liked to let others dig their own graves, for example when he accused Kamenev and Zinoviev of being ?Leftists? and communists who wanted to end the NEP.

  2. Stalin took over as the leader of the USSR in 1928, getting rid of ...

    Trotsky, on the other hand, was the leader of the Red Army and therefore had their support and of the younger party members, but the older communists did not support him and were worried about him becoming the leader as they were concerned that he would become a dictator especially with the support of the Red Army.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work