The Romans were responsible for the introduction of several new crops from other parts of the Empire; these included turnips, peas, cabbages, apples, cherries and walnuts among others. Although the cold climate in Britain inhibited its success, attempts were made at Gloucester and Boxmoor to cultivate grapes, for the purpose of wine production. New species of animals also came to Britain, especially cattle, and pigs.
The Edict of Prices by Diocletian refers to the birrus Britannicus, a cloak made from goat’s hair, and the tapete Britannicum – a woollen blanket. As these products are referred to as Britannicus (British), this source indicates that goats and sheep were kept in Roman Britain for their wool. However, the wool could have been imported from continental Europe and processed in Britain, as trade between Britain and other Roman provinces grew.
Language
Latin was the official language of the Roman Empire. As the official policy of the Empire was to promote Romanisation wherever possible, the language was spread to Britain – not just by the invading army, but also through trade between Britain and continental Europe. Juvenal, a Roman satirist writing in the 1st century AD, commented on the Britons’ improving use of the language: “Eloquent Gaul has taught [the Britons] to plead a case.” As cases were pleaded in the law-courts, where the speech was of a very elegant and persuasive quality, Juvenal is probably implying that the Britons had mastered Latin well.
However, it is likely that it would only have been those who exchanged contact with the Romans who learnt it: those who conducted trade with Rome, and the wealthier and more educated Celts. The peasants and labourers, who generally had little contact with the Romans, had no need for Latin, and so would have stuck with Celtic.
In other Roman provinces, such as Gaul (France) and Hispania (Spain), the Latin language was spread so well, that it eventually provided a direct basis for the grammar and vocabulary of the Romance group of languages, which include French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Britain did not absorb the language as well; however, not just early English but also the Celtic languages (such as Welsh and Cornish) took on many new words during the time of the Roman invasion. These words, “borrowed” from Latin, illustrated new concepts and ideas, as well as aspects of ordinary daily life. It is estimated that there are over 600 examples, of which a few are shown in the following table:
Latin Welsh Modern English
furca ffurch fork/pitch-fork
mola melin mill
castellum castell castle
oleum olew oil
vinea givinwydden vine
auctor awdur author
There are many more such words; those given above are those which resemble the Latin equivalents most closely. Furthermore, at least half of the modern English vocabulary derives from Latin words. This shows the lasting impact of the Romans’ language.
An end to warfare in Britain
Before Britain was invaded by the Romans, war was commonplace among the native people (especially during the Iron Age). However, there were no major conflicts recorded during the occupation. Considering that the Celts were known to be a fierce people, it seems remarkable that the Romans had “tamed” the Celts. This also bought other benefits to Britain: after the fighting associated with the Conquest ended, cattle raiding, capture into slavery, and battles with neighbouring tribes were no longer a threat.
Religion
Before Caesar's invasions, the Celts worshipped a number of spirits, believed to inhabit the sky, sea, mountains and trees. They satisfied these spirits through prayers and sacrifices. Some were associated with certain activities or places – for example, Nodens was the god of hunting, while Sulis was mainly worshipped around the area of Bath.
Throughout the Roman Empire, the people were allowed complete freedom of choice regarding their religious beliefs. So when the Romans came to Britain, instead of imposing their gods on the Celts, they attempted to link the Roman deities to their Celtic counterparts. For example, Mars was the Roman god of war, while the Celts followed Cocid. A new god, named “Mars-Cocidius”, emerged in Britain, common to both the natives and the invaders.
Similarly, Sulis, who was the goddess of the waters at Bath (Aquae Sulis, or “The Waters of Sulis”), was linked to the Roman goddess of the sea, Minerva. The result was a temple dedicated to “Sulis Minerva” at the waters in Bath.
Left: the head of Medusa at the temple of Sulis Minerva, Aquae Sulis. This statue incorporates elements from depictions of both deities, showing how the two religions were combined. Source: “Roman Britain” by H. H. Scullard.
The Imperial Cult
While the Celts seemed to accept the introduction of the Roman deities without much friction, they were unwilling to tolerate something which the Roman invaders considered perfectly normal: the practise of worshipping the emperor. The Celts could not understand how a mere mortal, even the Emperor, could be considered to be on an equal level with the gods.
The extent to which the Celts hated this practice was demonstrated in Colchester during the first century BC. Colchester, which at the time was the capital of the Britannia province, was the centre of the imperial cult; a temple had been built in the town which was dedicated to the emperor Claudius. As it had been expensive to build and subsequently maintain, the Temple of Claudius was seen by the Iceni tribe as a symbol of oppression: one Celt described it as “[a] symbol of everlasting dominion”.
For this reason, the Iceni tribe (led by Boudicca) formed a rebellion against the Roman invaders, starting at the Temple of Claudius in Colchester, which was razed to the ground. The rebels then moved on to Verulamium (St Albans) and London, but were defeated by the Roman army, at which point Boudicca swallowed poison to escape capture.
Above: An artist’s impression of the destruction at the Temple of Claudius, built in Colchester. Source: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/chris.rn/colchester/roman.html
Christianity
Christianity was, at first, banned under the Roman Empire – Christians faced persecution, and were therefore forced to meet in secret. It was only in 313 AD, under the reign of the emperor Constantine, that the faith was “legalised”. Despite this, some people did bring the Christian religion to Britain during the time of the Roman occupation, and the religion slowly grew in prominence – which could explain why Christianity is so prevalent in Britain today.
Followers of Christianity used secret symbols as a sign of recognition, of which some examples have been found in Roman buildings in Britain. For example, the “ROTAS” square (shown below) has been found on a wall in Cirencester, which dates from the 2nd or 3rd Century AD. Towards the end of the Roman occupation, in the 4th century, Christianity became a lot more widespread – Lullingstone Villa in Kent was partially rebuilt in 350-60 AD, and several rooms were decorated with Christian symbols at this time, such as those shown in the table below. A small chapel was also constructed at the site, presumably for the use of the family who lived at the villa.
The development of the towns
One of the major developments under the Roman occupation was the development of large settlements. The Celts in the 1st Century BC lived in small villages of eight to ten families, which were generally isolated from other people. By 50 AD, there were about 50,000 Romans living in Britain; as they were accustomed to living in towns, as they had done on continental Rome, new towns were built in Britain to house them.
The towns were also built as a means of maintaining control of Britain: the new luxuries which the towns offered ensured that the Celts would accept the invaders. The historian Tacitus wrote about the construction of the new towns:
In order that primitive men might be made peaceful and calm through luxurious living, Agricola encouraged and helped men to build temples, market places and temples; and gradually the Celts were attracted [to the towns] by the porticos, baths and feasts.
This source is not necessarily completely reliable. Tacitus was related to Agricola (he was his son-in-law) and so, although he was a historian, it would have benefited him to show Agricola in a positive way. Nevertheless, it is certainly true that the urbanised population grew during the Roman occupation, so the claim by Tacitus that the Celts were attracted to the town is probably valid.
Below: A typical forum in a Roman town, with public buildings, shops and places of worship surrounding a central space.
In towns on continental Europe, for example Pompeii, and the city of Rome itself, most of the commercial, religious and social activity centred on an open area in the centre of the town, known as the forum. Several of the towns developed under the Roman occupation of Britain also included a forum: Londinium (London) and Calleva (Silchester) are two examples.
Typically, the forum would consist of a large rectangular courtyard, enclosed by buildings. Shops and business premises often featured, as many came to the forum to conduct trade and other financial business. Roman towns were usually constructed with the streets in a grid pattern, as in modern American cities. A strong perimeter wall, with gates to allow traffic in and out, surrounded the town. Military forts were also built in this way during the Roman occupation.
There are still examples of Roman walls in several present-day towns in Britain, including London, Lincoln, Colchester and York.
Furthermore, the grid pattern of streets is still evident in some of these towns. Colchester is a good example of this style of planning: it features four gates in the perimeter wall, several parallel streets in a grid pattern, and the forum at the centre of the town.
Next page: A street plan of the Roman town of Colchester. The grid pattern of streets can be seen, as well as a strong perimeter wall to defend the town from invaders and a central forum.
Architecture
Celtic dwellings were primitive in comparison to the stone buildings in Roman cities. The Celts’ houses, consisting of a single room, were built from mud bricks; they were circular with a conical roof of straw. By contrast, the Romans built houses from strong stone bricks, and used tiles for roofing. Roman houses also had numerous rooms, as well as elaborate mosaic floors and ornamental gardens.
The Roman palace at Fishbourne, West Sussex, is one of the finest examples of Roman architecture in Britain. Constructed initially between 60-70 AD, it follows a similar layout to classical palaces in Italy: the palace is certainly Roman. There were over 70 rooms in the palace, of which many had fine mosaic floors; Fishbourne also comprises an enormous garden at the centre of the palace, framed by box hedges, and an “audience chamber”, built in the classical style of architecture.
There are numerous other villas built in the Roman style across southern Britain, built to house the Roman officials and the more prosperous of the Roman citizens who had come to live in Britain. There is little evidence of the buildings from Roman towns which still remains, but as the streets were built in a similar way to Roman towns on the continent, it would follow that these buildings were also built in the Roman style.
Below: Fishbourne Roman Palace, reconstructed to show the palace in around 75 AD. Source: “Beyond the Inhabited World” by Anthony Thwaite.
Roman building techniques are also in evidence in Britain. For example, a structure called a hypocaust was often used in Roman buildings to provide heating: a fire was used to heat air, which then passed under a floor supported on brick columns. The result was that heat was conducted through the floor and thus heated the room.
The left image shows a hypocaust from Fishbourne Palace; the right image is from the Stabian Baths in Pompeii. As you can see, the two structures are quite similar. Both were built by the Romans, so some Roman building techniques were clearly brought to Britain.
Images on previous page:
Left from www.btinternet.com/~initiative.cafe/fishbourne.html
Right from www.dartmouth.edu/~classics/rome2003/updates/week5_6/oct20.html
After the Romans left
Having arrived in 55BC, the Romans remained in Britain for the whole of the first three centuries AD. During this time, they strengthened what they had established upon their arrival: the towns were developed, more roads were built, and trade between Britain and continental provinces grew. However, disturbances towards 400AD, as well as trouble on the continent meant that the Romans began to scale down their activities on the island.
Despite this, by 400 AD there were many things in Britain which had changed over the 450 years of Roman occupation. Instead of isolated rural communities, the inhabitants slowly gravitated towards the towns, which grew in size and number during the occupation. This led to the development of a road network; in turn, trade and commerce increased. Unfortunately, attacks by the Saxons, Scots and barbarian tribes from the continent on Britannia took their toll, and the island entered a period of decline leading to the Dark Ages. Gildas, a contemporary historian, wrote about the departure of the Romans:
“Thereafter Britain was robbed of all her armed forces, her military supplies, her rulers, cruel as they were, her sturdy youth. They followed in the steps of the usurper mentioned above (Maximus), and never afterwards returned.”
Conclusion
The new practises and ideas which the Romans introduced to Britain had a mixed reception. Some aspects of their civilisation were adopted widely, such as their language and the crops that they brought to Britain; meanwhile other aspects, including the imperial cult, were rejected by the Celts. However, the Romans only left Britain at the beginning of the 5th century AD, when the Roman Empire was beginning to decline. Therefore, the Romans held a presence in Britain from 54 BC until at least 400 AD – a period of over 450 years. Their legacy can be seen even today, and therefore I think that the Romanisation of Britain must have had at least some effect.
3219 words
Sources used
Various authors: Cambridge Latin Course
(Cambridge University Press, 1970-98)
Various authors: Romans in Britain
www.romans-in-britain.org.uk
(Unknown): The End of Roman Rule
www.postroman.info/endrome2.htm
Peter Clayton: A Companion to Roman Britain
(Phaidon Press, 1980)
Debbie Day: Change and Evolution in Roman Britain
www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba30/ba30feat.html
Peter Lane: Roman Britain (Visual Sources Series)
(Batsford, 1980)
H. H. Scullard: Roman Britain – Outpost of the Empire
(Thames and Hudson, 1979-91)
Anthony Thwaite: Beyond the Inhabited World (The Mirror of Britain Series)
(André Deutsch, 1976)