• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Euthanasia - is it right?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia- is it right? The issue of Euthanasia Is now being brought to our television screens on a regular basis and I feel it is one of the most interesting and widely debated issues in government today. With contradicting views and a strong argument on each side it is well placed for discussion. The term "Euthanasia" comes from the Greek word for 'easy death'. Formally called 'mercy killing" it is the act of purposely making or helping someone die, instead of allowing nature to take its course. It can be done by a lethal injection or by simply switching of a life support machine. Euthanasia usually takes place to prevent a huge amount of suffering to terminally ill patients. It can be referred to as killing in the name of compassion. I have always found it difficult to look at loved ones suffer in pain and it is this experience that makes me feel that Euthanasia is acceptable in certain circumstances e.g. an incurable disease. It is unacceptable for a human to suffer when they can die peacefully; nevertheless everyone is going to die at one point. I feel that the government should consider revisiting the case of voluntary euthanasia which was dismissed in September 1991. Euthanasia can take place in five different ways all combined into one. ...read more.

Middle

Others may argue that humans cannot guarantee that a patient is definitely going to die and that they may have a miraculous recovery which has happened on numerous occasions in the past. Although its unlikely and medical advances have proved correct 9 out of 10 times religion argues that we are loosing one human out of every ten due to euthanasia. Religion also teaches that God decides if a person deserves to be cured as a result of their prayers or because of their good actions and that his decision is final. As God is seen as all good he must be causing suffering for a particular reason and that he must see something good out of it. Euthanasia is stopping Gods wishes or disregarding him and in doing so we are causing ourselves to be sinned. We are seen as God's servants and thus have no right over one another. We are not owners of life, but its caretakers because we belong to God who has full right over us just like you have right over something you own. However this view can be argued from the contrary as it can be said that if God is all good then he would not cause relations and loved ones suffering when they see their family and friends in pain. ...read more.

Conclusion

They may feel a burden to their family or may not understand their illness. A pro-longed life can be intolerable for people with a condition which leaves the brain alert but eventually shuts down all bodily functions and skills of communicating. People cannot be expected to live like this and the decision comes down to human morals. People believe that in these circumstances their legal representatives or close family should have the choice and the trust to let them live a prolonged life or to end their life and let them die with dignity. I believe that if the people involved can make the decision themselves then it could be morally acceptable. The Queen mother had also asked for the doctors to switch off the life support machine if she was ever terminally ill. This shows that euthanasia although illegal is still practiced by making it appear legal and not claiming that is was actually euthanasia. Everyday people sit in hospitals in agony due to a law which makes their easy peaceful death illegal. In conclusion, I accept that euthanasia is 'playing God' however I agree with it simply because I feel that people should not suffer and should die peacefully only if they wish. Therefore voluntary euthanasia is what should be legalised and other forms banned. I feel that the government should not have a decision on the life of a patient wanting to die. If God sees it as wrong then it will be them punished not anyone else. Anish Acharya Discursive Essay- Euthanasia 3/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    constant battle to end his own life, which he may never win. Also, the medical staff are omniscient, all-powerful and hold the power of life and death over him, Dr. Emerson, being the main principal. His regular attitude of being stubborn and inhospitable towards Ken defines his role in this play.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    The internet is extremely quick resource and saves a great deal of time. You can access information from all over the world and therefore you can find different case studies. Some of the information might have been out of date.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    that disabled people in general will simply be killed as a matter of routine because it is assumed that their lives are of no value. A patient with a terminal illness lacks the knowledge and skills to alleviate his own symptoms, and may well be suffering from fear about the

  2. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    to Contemporary Moral Issues: Christian View - The Bible teaches that all life is sacred and comes from God. Is obvious from the Bible verse (Ecclesiastes 3: 1-4) that human beings were not meant to choose when they die, 'For everything there is a season, and a time for every

  1. What is euthanasia?

    Mistakes can also occur, testing can go wrong. A doctor might take a patients life and then realise the diagnosis was incorrect. Doctors would have to be 100% sure that the information is correct which is almost never possible. There may be an element of doubt that could lead to terrible mistakes and a lifetime of regret.

  2. Is Euthanasia morally right? The term 'Euthanasia' comes from the Greek word for 'easy ...

    Medical advances in recent years have made it possible to keep terminally ill people alive for beyond a length of time, without any hope of recovery or improvement. For this reason the 'living ill� has come into use in the USA as part of the right-to-die principle.

  1. Euthanasia - the right to take a life

    The choice to let the person die or not is often left to the closest family member. However, the concept of passive euthanasia is not supported by all. There have been many cases in which people have totally recovered from comas several years later, supporting the idea that people should be kept alive at all costs.

  2. Euthanasia and the Right to Die With Dignity

    What about blood transfusions? The advances in medicinal technology have made it possible to sustain life when, a few years ago, death would have been certain. Medical technology has blurred the line between the capabilities of man and god. Thus it has posed the question, " Are you � playing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work