Preliminary work
We have carried out a trial run of the experiment to get ideas of what kind of dependent variables we would be noting and the types of independent variables that would affect the experiment.
The independent variable we are changing to acquire our results is the changing of the surrounding sucrose solution’s concentration. The values chosen for this experiment will range from 0.0 molar to 1.0 molar solutions and will include 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 solutions. These values will allow me to get a range of results and also to allow me to plot a graph with enough points to allow me to define the shape of the graph. My preliminary test showed me that in the real experiment repeats will have to be carried out as sometimes anomalies occur.
The way in which I will check the amount of water gained or lost in the cells is by checking their mass before and after the experiment. Other ways include checking their length and volume. We discarded these ideas in the preliminary experiment because to check the length of the potato would be too inaccurate as the only way to measure them is with a ruler. The change in length is usually too small for even a millimetre scale ruler. The only way to check for volume of the potato chip is to place them in water and see their change in volume. This is out of the question, as placing them in water would mean that they are subjected to osmosis and this would give inaccurate results. We also noticed that the potato strips still had a little bit of solution left on it. This, we also noticed makes a difference to the mass reading. We will make sure that in the real experiment, we would make sure that we have dried the potato strip with some paper towels so the surface of the potato strip is solution-free.
Other variables that could affect the results include:
- Surface Area of the potato strip
- Original mass of potato strip
- Time spent in the solution
- Water potential in the potato
These variables must be controlled in order to create a fair test i.e. each potato strip must be subjected to the same procedure and conditions as to not affect the results.
- Surface area of the potato chip is important and every potato piece needs to have the same surface area exposed to the surrounding solution. We noticed in the preliminary experiment that some of the potato pieces floated in certain solution strengths. This means that the potato piece would not be totally surrounded by the solution and would have some of its surface area exposed to air. To make this test fair, I have decided that I would have all the potato pieces to have identical pins inserted at one end of them. This will make all the floating-solution potato pieces sink to the bottom and all the potato pieces that sink anyway, identical to all the other pieces.
- The original mass of the potato pieces will have to be identical to each other for the test to be fair. We used cork borers to extract equal sized pieces from the potato. Then we used a straight edge and a scalpel to cut them all accurately to equal length. In the preliminary experiment, we realised that we could not cut them all exactly so that they would weigh a certain weight, so we decided to allow the potato pieces to have a range of 1.50g-1.70g. We also decided that our resulted should be based on percentage of mass change instead of mass change.
- Temperature is also an important factor in this experiment. We all know that the kinetic theory of molecules states that molecules move faster when subjected to heat. Therefore if some of our potato pieces were placed in a hotter environment, then osmosis would occur faster there. We can control this simply by placing each potato piece in the same place, out of sunlight and at room temperature.
- The time that was spent in solution is also an important factor. The time that is spent in the solution also affects how much water has had time to enter or leave the cell which means the cell has not had time to reach the isotonic point. This factor will be taken care of by allowing the potato pieces to stay in the solutions for a few hours, which is more than enough time for them to reach their isotonic point. Any difference in time that the potato strips spend in the solutions will be held to a minimum by placing and removing them within a small space in time.
- We also understand that the potatoes are not identical and have not received the same environmental factors when being grown. Since we are doing repeats in this experiment, there is not enough potato to make all of the strips so more than one potato has to be used. This factor cannot be helped except for me to choose the healthiest potatoes and makes sure they are of the same type of potato.
Apparatus
1x Scalpel – used to cut the potato strips to equal length
1x Tile – used to protect the table when cutting the potato strips
1x Glass Rod – used to stir the solutions when mixing water and sucrose solution
1x 30cm Ruler – used for the approximate measure of the potato strips
1x Cork Borer – used to accurately cut out the potato strips from the potato.
2x large potatoes – used as a source of plant tissue
200ml of distilled water – used to make the solutions
8x 250ml beakers – used to contain the water and sucrose solution and the other different molar solutions
200ml of 1M sucrose solution – used to make the solutions
1x marker pen – used to mark the beakers so that the contents can be identified
2x 50ml measuring cylinders – accurately measure the amounts of liquids to make the different concentration solutions
2x Pipette – used to accurately deposit the different amounts of water and sucrose in the measuring cylinders
18x Pins – used to weigh the potato strips down
3x different coloured strings – used to identify the different repeat experiment
Safety points and equipment
The scalpel is the main source of potential injury that could arise from this experiment. Potential risks can be reduced just by being careful when cutting the potato and also not to run with the scalpel.
Although the experiment does not include the use of any dangerous chemical or irritants, the sucrose solution can ruin clothes if it is allowed to dry. This can be resolved simply by wearing a lab coat.
Method
- Fill one beaker with 200ml of distilled water and one with 200ml of 1 Molar sucrose solution.
- Using the table below, fill each beaker with its required volumes of sucrose and water replacing the lids to prevent evaporation (measure the volumes out in the measuring cylinders, use one for sucrose and the other for water to avoid contamination). Use the pipettes for accuracy. Mark each beaker with its concentration.
- Slice 18 potato strips from the potato using the cork borer cutting each approximately 20mm long. Cut the potato on the slate to prevent any damage to the table. After cutting each cylinder place weigh them individually and note down their masses. Throw away potato strips that are not within the range of 1.50g and 1.70g
- Tie a piece string around each potato strip so you end up with 6 strips with blue string, 6 strips with red string and 6 strips with yellow string. Then place a pin into every single potato strip (take care to remember with potato strip has which mass)
- Place one potato piece of each colour into each beaker making sure that they don’t touch the sides of the beaker or each other.
- After the 4 hours remove the potato strips from the beaker and measure the mass of each one.
Results
Masses of potato strips at the beginning of the experiment
Masses of the potato strips at the end of the experiment
Percentage mass change
Results
Analysis
The results show that clearly there is a threshold at which the potato chip neither gains mass nor loses mass and that this threshold is between 0.2 – 0.4 molar concentration. The only way to see the exact point is to be shown on the graph. As you can see on the graph of “mass changes in experiments”, you can see that the lines show a definite negative correlation. This is shown by all three experiments. We also see that there are a few anomalies. In this graph, we can see that potato pieces from the 0.2 molar solution did not fit in with the curve line (it gave a slight bump). The fact that all the experiments showed that the mass change was slightly higher than expected shows us that there was something wrong with the solution in that it was not accurately made (the fact that the mass change was slightly to high means that slightly too much water was added in relation to the sucrose solution volume). However, this can not be the only explanation for the shape of the graph e.g. the 0.0 molar solution potato mass readings could be slightly lower than the expected results which may make us think that the 0.2 molar solution results were wrong. This could be due to the cell wall not allowing in any more water in which case the cells had reached their maximum mass. This could have been solved simply by taking more readings i.e. as well as taking the readings for 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 molar solutions, we could have also taken reading for the intervals between these values i.e. 0.1, 0.3 and so on. These extra readings will allow us to get more results and therefore give us a clearer picture on what the graph line looks like.
This line should therefore be taken into consideration that it is a curve. A curve line shows that the mass change and molarity of the surrounding solution is not proportional. The curve line does however prove that the cell wall does resist water pressure when too much mass is gained or lost (this is why the line smoothes off at 0.0 molar and 1.0 molar)
However, if we follow this curve and see at which molar solution point the line intersects with the 0 mass change line we can calculate the molar concentration strength in the potato cells. On the “Average” graph (this line has been created by taking the average percentage mass change of all three experiments), we see that the line cuts through the “mass change = 0” line at about 0.24 molar concentration. So from the whole experiment I can conclude that the water potential in a potato cell equals that of the water potential in a 0.24 molar concentration of sucrose.
Improvements and Evaluation
I think that the experiment was successful simply because the amount all of the experiments (different repeats) all gave that same answers. My conclusion of finding the water potential of the potato cell could have been helped if I had a greater range of molarities with smaller increments which would show more accurately mass changes and also allow me to plot a better graph. The amount of repeats was sufficient and I believe that any more repeats would just give the same answers. Also the potato pieces itself was not definitely from the same potato and was not exactly the same size, although I did try to cut them to 2cm each, this could have effected the amount of water gained or lost.
Anomalies include that in the yellow repeat in the 0.2 molar solution. This reading is not consistent as it indicates that that potato strip has not gained or lost any mass, which is inconsistent with the other repeats which show a range of 2.58% – 3.40% mass changes. This anomaly could have been caused by the strip not being weighed correctly at the beginning of the experiment or at the end of the experiment.
You’ll notice that the graph that shows all the results from each experiment do not all give the same mass change. Human error may have caused this. When the potato strips were removed from the test tubes and dried I may well have dried some potato pieces more thoroughly than others may and so some would have more excess water, which would add to the mass.
I think the conclusion reached is quite accurate. Although there was an anomalous result the rest lay on a smooth curve which intercepted the x-axis at a credible point. The exact value of this point may not be exactly accurate as it is calculated from a freehand curve of best fit. The best thing to do if I was to carry on this experiment would be to make a 0.24 molar solution of sucrose and place potato strips in it. If I was right then the potato strips should neither gain mass nor lose any mass.
Bibliography
Letts GCSE Revision Notes – Biology
Cambridge Advances Sciences Biology – Cambridge University Press
Compton’s Interactive Encyclopeadia