Effect of Temperature on Beetroot Membrane Proteins

Authors Avatar

Effect of Temperature on Beetroot Membrane Proteins

Planning

A – Independent Variable

The independent variable in this experiment will be the temperature. I will control this factor using thermostatically controlled water baths, and a thermometer. The temperatures at which the beetroot cubes will be tested will be 0° (ice), 20°C (room temperature), 40°C, 60°C and 80°C.

B – Dependent Variable

The dependant variable is the result – this experiment will initially yield qualitative results. This is not desirable as it is only approximate and as it is not viable to use it to plot graphs of the results. Therefore, the results will be converted from qualitative to quantitative using a colorimeter, which will measure the percentage light transmission through the different temperatures after the beetroot has been left in the boiling tubes for 5 minutes. A blue filter will be used to measure the redness of the solutions, as it is a complimentary colour.

The experiment will be repeated 3 times. This will make it possible to clearly identify errors or anomalous results by comparison, and to understand whether or not a mistake was made when carrying out the experiment. From the results of the original and repeat experiments, an average can be calculated for the percentage transmission of each temperature, giving more accurate results overall and providing values with which a graph can be plotted.

Controlled Variables

The surface area and mass of the beetroot cylinders may also affect the rate at which red pigment leaks out. This means that the cylinders must be as similar as possible in size and shape. They will all be as close as possible to 2.5cm long and will be extracted using the same cork borer.

Join now!

Any pigment that is on the surface of the beetroot before it is put into the water will affect the results. To avoid this, the beetroot cylinders should all be rinsed and lightly blotted on tissue paper

During the experiment, the lids on the water baths will be removed and replaced. This may have an effect on the actual temperature inside them, and could mean a deviation from the originally planned temperatures. To get one of the boiling tubes to a temperature of 0°C I will be using a basin containing a test tube rack in which the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

This experiment is written up very well. Technical terms are used when necessary, and grammar is used to emphasise the arguments.

The analysis in this piece is sound. The data is displayed clearly in a table, and some numerical calculations have been done to find the average of the repeats. I would note that when putting data in tables, you can be penalised if there are inconsistencies with the number of decimal places. Similarly, it doesn't make much sense to have the average being more precise than the results themselves. Further analysis could be done with the data, and I think a key skill which needs to be shown at GCSE is graph drawing. Being able to draw a graph with correct axes and then form a line of best fit (which people commonly think must be a line, but it can be a curve) will enable a piece of coursework to reach the top marks. A key concept when looking at temperature is the amount of kinetic energy. I liked how this essay mention how as temperature increases, the kinetic energy increases and thus the vibrations become more vigorous. They speak about the fluid-mosaic model and denaturation strongly. I also liked their discussion of qualitative data not being useful, so posing a way of getting quantitative data from their experiment by using a colorimeter. Understanding terms such as these shows an able candidate!

This piece of coursework answers the question well, analysing data collected to back up their conclusion. Scientific terms are used well to describe why the correlation occurs, but in my opinion it would've been better written a different way round. I tend to start with a hypothesis and explain the scientific concepts which led to this reasoning, then address how close the results were in the conclusion. I liked the strength of evaluation in this essay, and an improvement could be to suppose solutions to the limitations and then repeating the experiment again.