Economics Higher Level Coursework

Authors Avatar

Economics Commentary 2

Section 3

Title: Novartis becomes world’s biggest generic drug firm

Source: Independent, The (London, England) by Rachel Stevenson

In the article, the firm Novartis has taken over two other generic drug producers, namely Hexon and Eon Labs, to form the world’s largest generic drug manufacturer. It will be shown that this will lower Novartis’s production costs to increase profits, as the article suggests, and also that other parties will be affected in a good way.

When it is said the acquisition will allow cost savings by ‘bringing it to scale’, the firm is having internal economies of scale (EOS) from the result of expansion of the firm. The take over in this case is a horizontal integration, with Novartis buying firms Hexon and Eon in order to acquire them, all three which are in the same production stage in generic drugs. This provides an external growth of the firm as the factors of production are acquired from the taken firms, while it does not expand its scale by investing on these factors which is more costly and takes more time.

The average total costs of production (SRAC’s) will decrease by expanding the scale of the firm in the long run from increasing productive efficiency, which is called economies of scale. Internal economies of scale are enjoyed by Novartis for the following reasons. Firstly, as Novartis becomes larger, it would increase its production quantity by bulk buying larger numbers of inputs, thus gaining from commercial discounts. Interest rates from borrowing will also be lower as the firms will have more assets and it would be less risky to lend to them. Secondly, with a larger scale specialists can be employed to monitor the production, leading to efficient production.

Join now!

Also, since Novartis is based in Switzerland, Hexon in Germany and Eon in US, by increasing the firm’s geographical presence it is diversified into these different countries with different market demands, so the risk of fluctuating demand is lower and more stable. Since the product lines of the acquired companies are different, the market demands of these products manufactured are also diversified; even if one product faces a dropped demand the others may not be affected. Less risk bearing means less need to hold stocks, which lowers the cost of stockholding. Lastly and most importantly, since

the production ...

This is a preview of the whole essay