Nguyet Nguyen Do Minh (Na)        12EMW        January 31, 2010

What is Owen trying to express about war in his poetry?

It is a widely acknowledged truth that war is contemptible and cruel, but it takes the poetic opulence and the lively experience of the war to effectively convey one’s strong attitude against the reality of war. With his frequent use of contrast, para-rhyme and vivid imagery especially of blood and light in his collection of war poems, Wilfred Owen successfully portrays the brutal reality in battle thus stirs the readers’ sympathy for the soldiers, expresses his anger at the futility of war, demonstrates the disdain for ignorant people back at home and voices his anguish at the condemnation that these soldiers have to endure.

The horrendous experience Owen has gone through as a soldier in the British Army in World War I explains why the tremendous sufferings by the soldiers stands as the most predominant idea in almost all his poems in the anthology. From the passive suffering of cold winds that “knife us” (Exposure) to the disturbing death of an unlucky fellow comrade in gas warfare (Dulce et Decorum est) “flound’ring like a man in fire or lime”, Owen presents a wide range of pains that blurs the boundary between life and death. Although the type of destruction portrayed in each poem is not the same as any other, they all highlight the frightening cruelty of the war, most obvious of all the deterioration of a man’s physical appearance and strength. They are all “knock-kneed, coughing like hags” before someone was caught in the toxic gas “guttering, choking, drowning” (Dulce et Decorum est), having “old wounds save with cold that can not more ache” (Insensibility) that escalate into “a thousand pains” (Strange Meeting), or even losing their sight “eyeballs, huge-bulged like squids” that brings them to such a total breakdown that “he sobbed” (The Sentry). “All went lame, all blind” because the merciless war gives no exception whatsoever, and that they had lost their boots makes no difference, they still “limped on, bloodshod”.

Using factual vocabulary and vivid imagery which might at some point become grotesque, Wilfred Owen exposes the ugly truth of the war. Blood is an effective image conveying the sense of suffering in the battle, all of which is disturbing and brutal. It bears the connotation both of the death of soldiers and their guilt of shedding the lives of other human beings. The blood either “come gargling from the froth-corrupted lung” (Dulce et Decorum est) or even gets “clogged their chariot wheels” (Strange Meeting). Also, if one notices he would see that the word “blood-shod” in Dulce et Decorum est which echoes “blood-shed” fully conveys the hellish nature of the war. So much blood has poured that “the veins ran dry” (Disabled). Owen also successfully utilizes the effect of sounds and pace. By breaking lines into short fragments, he depicts the exhaustion and the limping of these men through the night. Also, whenever he talks about sufferings, Owen uses harsh sounds such as “k” (knock-kneed), “d” (drunk with fatigue, deaf to the hoots)”, “b” and “p” (what we spoiled/ Or, discontent, boil bloody, and be spilled”) which are either naturally unpleasant sounds or are even reminiscent of the sounds that rifles make. Death is prevailing in these poems and we see most clearly in “Strange Meeting” that the para-rhyme with the second rhyme lower in pitch than the first demonstrates the dying that these soldiers are going through. They start of as enthusiastic youth only to see themselves slowly rotten away to death. That is the brutal reality of war that Owen brings to readers. Through this we can see clearly that he is strongly anti-war.

Join now!

                                                                                                                                                                                                        ...

This is a preview of the whole essay