• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this statement mean and do you think it is a fair representation of the relationship between perception, emotion reason and language?

Extracts from this document...


"All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this statement mean and do you think it is a fair representation of the relationship between perception, emotion reason and language? In our world there are many ways of knowing, such as language, perception, emotion, reason, and so on. Each way of knowing, has its advantages and disadvantages, and therefore there are differences between these areas of knowing. These areas of knowing allow humans to get knowledge, which shape the knower, which are the people getting the knowledge. Are all ways of knowing controlled by language? If yes, then language either controls it because all knowledge is communicated in language and there is some form of knowledge that cannot be transmitted so. Or that the structure of language restricts thought, which is part of the process of acquiring knowledge, and therefore is knowledge. However each human has his own paradigm, which shapes their way of obtaining their knowledge. Language, language is the words we use to deliver information to other people or receive them. But of course we must not forget that we language in communication since it can be said the easiest way to give and receive knowledge, and we as humans use it most in our daily life. ...read more.


In this case we must know how to distinguish between a concept the word refers to and the idea it is really meant to convey. Another example is "black man" and "nigger", both might refer to the same idea. However one is completely offensive and unacceptable, and is showing racism. Now the denotation of the word nigger is black and is used to refer to a person, but the word does have a racist connotation. How about this: if nothing is better than freedom, and playing cards is better than nothing, therefore playing cards is better than freedom!!! This is just a small trick that can be done using language, which could provide completely wrong knowledge. So as it can be seen language is not perfect in providing knowledge. Moreover, a problem is the mutability and unreliability of language. Before we think that language's imprecision is so much a bad thing, let us remember that it is because of the desire for precision that we constantly add to and modify language. And unless we somehow developed direct mind-to-mind communication, it is our only form of communication. And why is a language so constantly changing? Simply because we are in the process of acquiring knowledge! ...read more.


Therefore it is a great source of truth. We also use perception as a way of knowing which is using the senses to understand things such as looking, hearing and tasting and so on, but the main problem with this part of knowing is that it can not be falsified and it is limited, since our eyes and ears are limited in doing their function and so are the rest of our body organs which are used for perception. For example our ears can not hear everything since we can not hear sounds beyond the frequency of twenty thousand and less than two hundred. But as for art which is extremely subjective perception would be the best way of understanding since there is no good or bad art. This means that there is no black or white in this way of knowing because each person has a different way of perception and understanding things. Therefore it is hard to get the truth from it. In conclusion, it can be interpreted that language doesn't control the other ways of knowing. So instead of saying that our language is controlling or restricting our ways of knowing, in a sense it is our ways of knowing that are controlling and shaping language for its purpose. Word count: 1613 Done by: Bassam Al-Nawaiseh ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent do you think reason is an objective, reliable way of knowing? ...

    This relation is often a determining factor of the reasoning of the person. A common example of emotion being a factor which determines ones reasoning is in the advertising business, in which case the adverts appeal to the emotions of the viewers which could potentially change their reasoning towards a

  2. "All other Ways of Knowing are controlled by language."

    Or, to phrase it another way, without language we could not perceive something, have emotions or reason from premises to conclusions. Such an assertion raises several knowledge issues. The first knowledge issue raised by language's role in perception involves people who lack language but who clearly have perceptions.

  1. Defining and Analyzing Mixed Method Johnson and Christensen (2007) describe mixed research as the ...

    Denkin (1994) used qualitative methods to assist his research to search for a deeper truth. The aim or purpose of this research was to study things in their natural setting, attempting to make sense of, or interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them.

  2. All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language. What does this ...

    Language to me, is just what you say, read and write. Language in this context does not include behaviour, or body language, how ever you might call it. Some say, that knowledge is always influenced by language. There are extremists who say, that the whole world consists of language, and they have their point.

  1. Is it possible to think without language? How does language facilitate, extend, direct or ...

    Several researchers have worked for years on this and they have found out that babies who still cannot talk can actually think; now the same researchers are trying to understand how they do this. A ScienceDaily article from 2004 states that: ?Babies as young as five months old make distinctions

  2. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    However, scientifically, I know that this table is mainly empty space for there are spaces in between the molecules held in a lattice, vibrating at high speed. Richard Dawkins likens atoms at a molecular level to balls in a sports hall, one ball or 80 atom in one sports hall, with the next atom in the next sports hall along.

  1. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history

    Firstly, our premises in deductive reasoning are assumed. How sure are we that all wars are bad? Who can define what is ?bad?? Secondly, this applies to inductive reasoning too. Singapore, for example, introduced conscription for defense purposes and certainly not to wage a war.

  2. Man Is the animal that speaks, Understanding language is thus the key to understanding ...

    of language is bound to change and their understanding of language is likely to change too. The final knowledge issue to be explored from this quote is ?To what extent is language the key to understanding man?? In some ways language is the key, and this is because in an

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work