In the aspect of language of people, depending on the culture and the kind of group of people you are dealing with the context will be different. For example “hit the ground” this phrase is commonly used in the urban dance that some people practice where they fusion rap and freestyle moves; in this environment this phrase will mean “dance” ; but if you go to other group of people and tell them “hit the ground” they will stomp their feet in the ground. This is simply because the context is surrounding in a different environment. This proves that many phrases have completely different meanings depending on their use.
If you get yourself a clear thinking of things that had happen in your entire life and looked at the errors, mistakes and misunderstanding information they all get to the same spot, the bad communication or the wrong interpretation of things.
Now that we have defined the important words in this statement we can observe how context matter in different areas of life. In some aspects like math the context of the problem will not affect the result of itself. I the other hand if we take for example the theme of some kind of history you are in the need to establish the environment of what you are talking about for someone to understand the context. We can conclude from this paragraph that in some cases there is no such thing as truth but in some others it does exist but not completely.
The truth can vary, and there is no such thing as a one hundred percent true statement. Why do I say this? Simply, there will be always different opinions of people about everything and depending on the time and the place you are it will be the kind of truth you are going to obtain. Let’s get an example of religion vs. physics. If we get as an example the creation of man, religion and the science of physics will say a completely different statement. From religion we will obtain that got create man, starting with a man and a woman and starting from that point, humanity get created; and from a scientific view, man was evolving from the most primitive creature until it got what we are. The context is the same, but the focus of the idea is based on two different aspects and this is where the statement that “there is no such thing as truth” takes place because it depends on the plane you are and it will be the different kind of truth you will perceive and support and at the end you won’t know exactly what is true if you didn’t were in the right spot at the right time; and even though you will be able to be there, if someone else had been there too but in a different spot both of you will perceive different things from each other and get a different kind of thing, a different truth. This happens if somebody born in a specific environment, this person will have different opinions and different views of things and would not be able to understand ideas from people of other environments that share different opinions.
When thinking about non-linguistic cases of dealing with context, such an extreme as a civil war would be a good example. Environment of immense chaos is created and it’s very hard to judge on almost anything. It’s problematic to conclude who is right and who is wrong, to apply any norms of modern society. It is almost useless to think about any moral canons and draw parallels with “normal” conditions in this case. Also, if somebody grew up in such an environment, he would have far different views on many things and wouldn’t be able to understand many people who grew up in different conditions.
If we now think about such an area as arts, there are some similar troubles there as well. If one wants to interpret a painting, or a musical composition, to find out what the artist meant by his creation, many things have to be taken into account: such as the time when he lived, his country of birth and residence, and whatnot. For example if we think what the Spanish architect Antonio Gaudí would design, we would be mistaken trying to deduce that his style was similar to ones of other architects of the same epoch and origin. He spent a lot of time alone, and therefore developed an extremely original style of his own. If one was to attempt to comment on any of Gaudí’s creations, he would be in trouble without a proper research in advance. This implies to many cases in analytical criticism – no stereotypes should be made to achieve a reasonable result, and as much background information as possible about the artist should be taken into account to compile an objective result.
You can firmly say that there is no such thing as a completely true thing in the whole world.
