How accurate is it to describe the disturbances in British cities in the 1980s and 2001 as 'race riots'?

Authors Avatar

                                                                                     

How accurate is it to describe the disturbances in British cities in the 1980s and 2001 as ‘race riots’?

The urban disturbances of the 1980s and 2001 have largely been described as ‘race riots’, however in order to review this claim accurately, one must gain an insight into the broader picture.  A large percentage of the so-called ‘race riot’ reporting has been portrayed through the media, thus giving way to a degree of marjinalization in some areas.  Underlying issues, historical events and recognised non-media reporting are also crucial factors.

  Although the disturbances in Brixton in 1981 continued for several days, it was in fact the urban unrest in the St. Paul’s district of Bristol in April 1980 that set the precedent for a series of disorders during the 1980’s (Rowe, M. 1995).  Many have labelled these disturbances as ‘riots’, however whether they can actually be described as ‘riots’ remains an unanswered question (Kettle, M. 1982).  English law defines a ‘riot’ in a very specific way and although the term is widely used, some argue that these disturbances do not have all the fundamental characteristics to define them as a ‘true riot’.  

  There is certainly strong evidence to suggest that these ‘riots’ were race related and were particularly focused on the police.  Some argue that the disturbances were a direct result of the police’s neglect of the well being of its black communities.  Furthermore, the riots that erupted in Bristol in 1980, began after a raid on a café escalated into street disorder and only ended after police had withdrawn from the area, thus leading to allegations that the district had become a ‘no-go’ area (Rowe, M. 1995).  The rioting against police has been put down to the fact that the black communities had no faith or trust in the police force after years of being ignored, therefore they had no relationship and ‘no mercy’.  Fryer suggests that the disorders in Bristol became ‘a symbol of resistance’, however others argue that the disorders became symbolic in the sense that they represented an early stage in the racialisation of public disorder that continued throughout the decade (Rowe, M. 1995).  

Join now!

  The trend continued particularly throughout the summer of 1981 and rioting engulfed the country, spreading to places such as Southall, Liverpool, Moss Side and to the aforementioned Brixton.  A significant piece of evidence to suggest that all of these displays of public disorder were ‘race riots’ was that all of the cities involved in the riots were all cities that were densely populated with black and ethnic culture. Southall in west London boasted 30,000 Asians, while Toxteth in Liverpool 8, housed most of the cities 30,000 blacks (Kettle, M. 1982).  Similarly, Moss Side in Manchester was well documented ...

This is a preview of the whole essay