Discuss the different attitudes between China and Japan regarding the Opium trade.

Authors Avatar

Discuss the different attitudes between China and Japan regarding the Opium trade.

Western Imperialism in South East Asia resulted in the expansion of the opium trade. Opium was the commodity colonising nations used to further financial gains and open trade routes. China and Japan were altered economically as a result of the opium trade. Changes in production, alliances between government and business, aswell as traditional social and political  institutions were affected. European 'free trade' and attempts to exclude the foreign opium trade led to greater threats of Western Imperialism. Chinese and Japanese empires were forced to modernise, forced to adhere to unfair treaties and forced into dealing with this new commodity. Both countries having different cultural heritages, and weakness' within thier societies and responded to the opium trade and western domination differently.  

Early attempts from Western powers to commercially enter China and Japan were rejected. Both the Chinese and Japanese felt no need to develop links with other societies and regarded themselves as superior to any outsiders (Teng & Fairbank 1954). Despite this anti-imperialist sentiment China and Japan could not avoid western encroachment. Opium was seen as a solution for Europeans, who were losing precious metals to the East during the eighteenth century from purchasing thier fine wares and tea.(Courtwright, 2000 p.167) Like sugar and tabacco before it, opium made the transition from an exotic chemical to a "capitalist" drug commodity.

        

"The commodification of the drug trades in tabacco, sugar and tea, were major factors in the earlier stages of capitalist development. These drugs turned the European peasants and urban masses into a consumer-proletariat while they fattened the local bourgeoisie. Opium had a similar impact on Asia." (Trocki, 1999 p.33)   46

 Europeans focused on China due to its large population, a potential mass market for the drug. (Fitzgerald, 1966 p.93 & Trocki, 1999 p.58)

Administration was spread thinly across China's large empire. Traditionally government and ruling class lived of the peasantry. Trade was agrigarian. Institutionalised corruption of China's domestic farm economy was in place before opium farming occured, there was already a struggle between the people, landlords and government. Poverty and political decline were a feature of China (Fairbank, 1953 p.266). As far back as the Ming Dynasty political unity was the focus of China, rather than a fostering of industry or foriegn trade (Fairbank, 1992 p.137 & Fitzgerald, 1966 p.81). This lead to corruption?????

Join now!

 

Trade in opium within China is recorded as early as the sixteenth century. Produced long distances away from China, in Persia and India, the Chinese were ignorant of how opium was produced. As original supply was not large, opium attracted high prices on the Chinese market. Originally it was an elitist purchase, being so expensive, but as the market was flooded and the price dropped it became available to the common labourer (Trocki 1999 p.22).

Around 1820 the Chinese themselves began producing opium, it was "... not before 1860 that local production began to fill even a small ...

This is a preview of the whole essay