Commentary on a passage from “El Médico de su Honra”

Authors Avatar

Commentary on a passage from “El Médico de su Honra”

            This passage is taken from the “Segunda Jornada” of the play. In the lines preceding it, Prince Enrique escapes Gutierre’s unexpected appearance at his own house. The only evidence that Gutierre finds is a dagger in Mencía’s room. Ironically, it is Mencía who says:

 

“Al verte ansí presumía

que ya en mi sangre bañada,

hoy moría desangrda.”

 

On seeing her husband holding the dagger.

 In making the rounds of the city of Seville, the king finds to his surprise countless rogues and “damas desveladas”. Coquín, the “gracioso” character in the play tries his hardest to make the king laugh in a bid to earn some gold coins, much to his distress the king dismisses it saying  “!Qué frialdad!”. Don Enrique’s return prompts the king to have both Arias and Don Gutierre released from prison on account of Arias being Enrique’s royal favourite. To Gutierre’s astonishment, the design on the dagger that he has found matches that of the Prince’s sword. Don Gutierre’s long speech, which contains this passage, gives the audience an insight into his grievances and afflictions over the Prince’s relationship with Mencía. He is undecided over what to think, whether the evidence points towards Enrique being in the house at the time or if it was his imagination.

            After his monologue, Gutierre leaves Don Arias and Doña Leonor to discuss their relationship. Despite Arias’ flattery, he accuses Gutierre of being a jealous lover who has not been punished by the heavens. Leonor consequently reviles Arias for not respecting the honour of such a gentleman. Gutierre, now out from prison, is able to visit Mencía in her sleep. He awakes her from the window and pretends to be Prince Enrique, adopting his voice. As a result, Mencía addresses him thinking that he is the prince. She begs him to go away in case Gutierre might come – this climax spawns Gutierre’s jealousy and confirms his suspicions at the close of Act Two.

Join now!

Gutierre is initially convinced that the prince must be innocent. He makes a case in the prince’s defence but the compelling evidence of the dagger still dogs him. It is ironic that he should be pleased with discovering a subtlety that turns out to be completely the opposite of his own conclusion. The first line of the passage refers not only to his very own argument but could also be reminiscent of the discussion that he consequently has with  Mencía at her window. The words:

 

“…Mencía es quien es ,

y soy quien soy…”

 

are statements defining identity ...

This is a preview of the whole essay