• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discrimination and Law.

Extracts from this document...


Discrimination and Law 2003-2004 Formative Assessment "Legislative changes have been necessary to clarify when a chief constable can be found liable for discrimination committed by police officers in the course of employment. These can be viewed as a reflection of the recent legal developments which have extended the potential for any employer to be liable for acts of discrimination in the workplace, whether committed by the employers themselves or by employees." Discuss. Submission The essay, of no more than 2,500 words (inclusive of footnotes / references), is to be submitted by 4pm on Monday, January 12th, 2004 to Pauline Roberts, room 1.08. Refer in particular to the amendment 2003 regulations etc introduced by the macpherson committee etc etc...RRAA 2000??? WHICH ONE IS IT?? OR 2003?? Public authorities etc extended to police etc chief constables can now be vicariously liable etc etc etc.... Start with quote..... "The full force of the race relations legislation should apply to all police officers, and that chief officers of police should be made vicariously liable for the acts and omissions of their officers relevant to that legislation". In a speech made in the commons following the MacPherson committee enquiry into the death of black teenager Stephen Lawrence, Jack Straw highlighted the shortfalls of the current legislation, promising that the government would tackle these issues. ...read more.


Nor could the commissioner be liable for the actions of his officers under the normal employment rule, because police are historically not employees but independent office-holders. These shortfalls were unacceptable considering these are areas in which the individual is most vulnerable to racial discrimination, as was apparent in the reaction of the police and other authorities in response to the murder of a young black man, Stephen Lawrence. The MacPherson enquiry was established to investigate the response to the murder and subsequently their findings of 'institutional racism' lead to further attacks on the inadequacy of the current legislation. Thus the Amended Race Relations Act 2000 has now been introduced to combat these deficiencies. One will now discuss the relevant provisions in relation to this essay. Firstly the Amended Act makes it unlawful for a public authority to discriminate or victimize a person on racial grounds in carrying out any of its functions. Crucially, this is not confined to employment, education, and services, but applies to all functions of specified public authorities. Law enforcement, inclusive of the police, and local authorities will for the first time be subject to the legislative provisions. A further significant amendment relates to chief police officers and the fact that for the first time they can be made vicariously liable for acts of discrimination. ...read more.


But the fact that the amendment was only restricted to direct discrimination was a "serious omission". Extending the law to deal with indirect discrimination was the great innovation when the present Race Relations Act was passed in 1976, reflecting the growing recognition that it was the hidden, often unconscious, kinds of discrimination that were the most insidious and widespread. The focus of the Lawrence report was on the prevalence of institutional discrimination, which is commonly indirect. The disastrous failure to bring Stephen Lawrence's killers to justice stemmed from attitudes and practices in investigating crime which could have played a similar part in the many other investigations into the deaths of black people, such as Michael Menson and Ricky Reel. Direct discrimination can hardly ever be established. Further proposals for reform?? CONCLUSION In conclusion as Jack Straw acknowledged during the passage of the Bill to make the amendments, there is still a long way to go to make Britain a 'beacon of equality' and despite the initial praise, the legislation has suffered extensive criticism at its failure to acknowledge indirect discrimination in its reforms, with this form of discrimination left omitted further reforms are necessary.....QUOTE FROM CRE... SCARMAN??? REFORMS ETC ETC 1 Farah v Commissioner for the Police of the Metropolis [1998] QB 65 (CA) 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Employment Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Employment Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically assess how effective employment law is as a means of altering social attitudes.

    4 star(s)

    there has been a high level of compliance by employers of their statutory duties which have led to considerable improvements in equality based employment.51 These experiences indeed indicate that compulsory affirmative action does in fact reverse discriminatory practices and inequalities in labour market, this is backed up by Kivel who states, "Affirmative action works.

  2. I will be looking at the issue of disability discrimination in employment. I will ...

    employer to make reasonable changes is only relevant to job-related arrangements, and it does not broaden the duty to provide a personal carer to help with the personal needs of a disabled employee. The Act does however list seven factors incorporating issues such as cost, effectiveness etc, which must also

  1. Employment law

    Second procedure to consider is was there a dismissal? Yes because she was dismisses at the spot when she was cut in act. Third action to be considering was did the ER act reasonably in dismissing? No he didn't act reasonably in dismissal because before dismissing an employee they should be giving a formal notice of meeting which will

  2. Labour law

    Another issue that occurs with the situation is the issue of vicarious liability. Vicarious liability is when one party is held legally responsible for the actions of another. In this case it is when the employer is liable for the acts of his employees.

  1. Employment Law

    relation to the reduction of wages as was seen in Rigby v Ferodo Ltd11. However it may be necessary to introduce such unilateral changes in order to maintain the survival of the business, as has been recognized in the context of redundancy law12, and in that case the employer may

  2. employment law problem question

    Section 133 provides that an employer shall not make deductions from wages of a worker employed by him unless the deduction is, required or authorised by statute, required or authorised by a provision in the contract of employment which

  1. Employment Law Scenario. In this scenario there are many issues that are relevant in ...

    their undertakings in such a way to ensure, so far as it is reasonably practicable, that persons not in their employment who may be affected thereby are not exposed to risks to their health and safety." (Nairns, 2008) As well it is stated that "the employer must inspect work to

  2. Sexual Harassment Law

    Thus a judge has some scope to apply personal preference within the prescribed framework. The judge is required to sentence based on seriousness of the crime. This in turn is defined in terms of culpability and harm done (both to an individual and society generally).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work