• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

In my essay Im going to look what Human rights are and who is entitled to Human rights. I will mainly focus on the declaration of human rights since it is the most recent establishment of human rights.

Extracts from this document...


What are Human Rights? Human rights have always been very controversial. Since the existing of mankind rulers have always set up some kind of human rights to control their citizen or to give them the freedom they needed. But never has freedom been enjoyed that much as in today's western culture. Especially after the declaration of human rights, which tries to give everyone no matter what religion, inheritance or culture they belong too. However on the other hand many people argue that the declaration of human rights in mainly a western concept and shouldn't be imposed on non western countries. In my essay I'm going to look what Human rights are and who is entitled to Human rights. I will mainly focus on the declaration of human rights since it is the most recent establishment of human rights. 1"Human rights is not a thing but a concept, a way of thinking and making claims about certain events. These claims derive from morals rules and are expressed in legal terms or United Nations dialect." ...read more.


Many people argue that the convention of Human rights is one of the most fundamental establishments for the benefit of human rights, because it forces human rights on the countries, which signed the declaration and previously did not have any human rights. But fact is that the convention of human rights was created at the time of the Second World War, when the west was desperately in the search of a concept of rights, which would make every human being equal despite all religious, cultural and racial differences. However some people argue 4"if the history of the concept is Western, its validity cannot be universal" but should only be limited on Western countries. People in the west have different views then the rest of the world. So how can one group of people impose their rights on another who doesn't share the same culture or religion? They might think the way they lived for 100 of years is the right way of living and who are we human being judging other people whether they are right or wrong? ...read more.


6"Every Human being is free...Everyone has the right to life...No one shall be held in slavery" But in reality the main question is whether these right are right or wrong and who decides whether they are and if you have the right to impose them on people who don't have the same beliefs as you. In conclusion I believe that human rights are set of rules, which want to give every human being equal rights. However the problem, which then occurs is who makes those rights. If it's a human being, how do we know if he is right or wrong? Everything could be right or wrong but you don't know. It is your upbringing, society, culture religion and peers who influence how you decide whether something is right or wrong. Is it God who should make the ultimate human rights, since he is faultless? But then you would have to prove that god exists. Moreover the question arises if we think we have the right human rights, should we really be imposing them on other countries. All these questions are to complex, therefore I believe that everyone has to search for their definition own human rights, since human rights are just ideologies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Rights Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Rights Law essays

  1. This essay will be divided into four sections. In the first section, the issue ...

    them.2 Due to this, the member of a community may try to dissociate or withdraw him/herself from the community. This in turn leads to the decomposition of a community. Hate speech, then, although does not bring any physical harm to the community, it intends to devastate a community by causing psychological pain to its members.

  2. human rights

    This means that as society and attitudes change, the ECHR will change and develop the way in which it interprets the Convention. The ECHR will, however, still tend to follow the precedents set by earlier cases - where it does not it will make it clear why it is not doing so.

  1. Human Rights Essay - Freedom to Protest and Extradition case studies.

    As on every right there are some formalities, conditions, restrictions and sometimes penalties prescribed by law in the interest of safety of the democratic society. Freedom to protest is a great responsibility and as such it carries with it duties.

  2. The Human RIghts Act Has Revolutionised the Way Judges Interpret Statutes. Discuss.

    as to ?give sufficient evidence?, placing an evidential, instead of a legal burden on the defendant as was originally required when a defence is invoked under Section 28 of the MDA 1971. 12 The obligation to interpret legislation in a way which is compatible with Convention rights can have quite far-reaching effects [14].

  1. Human Rights Act 1998: Are all human rights absolute and inalienable?

    to the argument that the rights contained within are of universal application and apply across cultures. The radical universalist position therefore suggests that culture has no relevance to the validity of moral rights or rules, which are valid across all cultures equally.[17] At the opposite end of the spectrum, the

  2. What kind of responsibility do some states have for the rights of the subjects ...

    First of all, it usually refers to the Council of Europe, the OSCE, the European Union, the African Union and states where the use of the capacity of these organizations will create the need for effective action. "The responsibility to protect" focuses on preventing and ending the following types of crimes: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing.

  1. Human Rights - Articles 6 and 8 applied to fictitious cases.

    5 of the CCA) the court will not regard it as contempt of court (Attorney General v English [1983] 1 AC 116). In addition, if the editor can prove that, at the time of the publication, they did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that the proceedings were active (S.3(1), (2)

  2. This essay will discuss what is meant by Human Rights and go on to ...

    The rights to privacy and Article 10. The freedom of expression will be looked at in more detail. The Council of Europe created the European Convention of Human Right (theConvention) in 1950 to provide legal protections for the concepts in the Declaration. In 2000 the Labour Government brought the majority of The Convention into English law with the Human Rights Act (the Act)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work