To what extent does the print-media influence young people into smoking, in relation to the recent restrictions on tobacco advertising?

Authors Avatar

To what extent does the print-media influence young people into smoking, in relation to the recent restrictions on tobacco advertising?

Introduction

Media messages in our modern society are endemic. They are projected through television, film and radio, by way of advertising, via newspapers and magazines, on the internet and through books, brochures and posters. It is near impossible to escape the constant messages fired from the media, and the extent of its influence upon society has been frequently questioned throughout the years.

Despite the deteriorating reputation of smoking, images of it can be witnessed daily through the media, particularly within celebrity magazines. In February 2003, a law was passed banning tobacco companies from advertising their products on billboards, in the print media and even through sport sponsorship. Regardless of their questionable effectiveness, these laws do not forbid images of smoking being printed in newspapers and magazines. Some celebrity magazines may illustrate famous people as ‘common’ when they are photographed with a cigarette; however the picture is still sold to the masses. This may have a detrimental effect on society, particularly to young people, who may be susceptible to influences from the media.

This dissertation aims to provide a study of the literature connected with media influences on tobacco and attempts to relate these to the rise in youth smoking. It will concentrate on and summarize some of the concepts by which these images might influence the uptake of smoking among the youth.

Chapter One

The dissertation will present information on the UK ban of tobacco advertising and promotion, which occurred on 14 February 2003. The dissertation will investigate the terms of the UK Act in regard to tobacco advertising in the print media and on billboards. Regulations determining the implementation of the sports sponsorship ban will be covered, along with the ban on television cigarette advertising. Other forms of advertising and promotion will be investigated, including internet publicity, cigarette branded clothing and accessories and tobacco sports sponsorship. A study by the Centre for Media Education on pro-smoking websites will be detailed in the dissertation, as will the sinister attempts to endorse smoking to teenagers by tobacco companies. The subject of anti-smoking campaigns, the latest larger health warnings on cigarette packets and the increasing cost of cigarettes will all be detailed in the dissertation.

Chapter Two

The next issue to be covered is the rise of teenage smoking, throughout Britain, and the health risks involved. The dissertation will research into studies of young smokers that have been conducted and attempt to understand why the habit is adopted. The dissertation will look closely into the image of smoking held by young people and investigate into the suggestion that some see it as ‘cool’ and as ‘rebellion chic’.

Chapter Three

The dissertation will then investigate the ways in which the media has represented smoking and the tobacco industry through the years. It will also cover the glamorous image of smoking in Hollywood through the decades, as depicted by movie stars such as Audrey Hepburn and James Dean. Chapter three will look at modern day Hollywood celebrities and discuss their presence in the media. The dissertation will then investigate the extent to which the media may influence children and young people and external theories will be included as evidence to support the supposition.

Chapter Four

The dissertation will then provide an overview of some of the literature relevant to the study of media uses and effects. An in depth study will then be conducted into the way in which celebrity magazines, teen magazines, general magazines and newspapers feature images of celebrities smoking. Perceptions of ‘rebellion chic’ can be generated through the image of a supermodel, such as Kate Moss, or a Hollywood film star, such as Colin Farrell, being featured in a photograph smoking. The dissertation will include such images of celebrity smokers, taken from these sources of print media and analyze them individually, according to the attached article or caption. The way in which the celebrity is portrayed and the image they exude to the reader will be studied. The dissertation aims to discover whether these images can influence a young person, who may be a fan of the celebrity in question, to start smoking, if they see it as ‘cool’ and chic. The dissertation will look at the photographs of celebrity smokers to discover whether they exude an image of rebellion and look closely into whether this may make an impression a young person.

Conclusion

The final section of the dissertation provides a further discussion on the experimental findings in the context of the aforementioned theories. The dissertation will then incorporate theories of media effects with the hypothesis that images of celebrities smoking in the print media may influence young people into smoking. Ideas from sections throughout the dissertation will be discussed in order to draw informed conclusions on the subject. The theories will then give an indication of the extent to which young people are susceptible to influence by the media and in particular the print media. Essentially, the dissertation aims to find a correlation between media images of smoking and the reputation it has with the younger generation as being taboo chic and identify issues of media influences.

Chapter One

The Ban on Tobacco Advertising in the UK

Over the past several decades, the limits of tobacco advertising have been heavily scrutinised. As a multi million pound industry, tobacco companies have been increasingly limited in the way in which they advertise their products.

Ash (The Action on Smoking and Health) website, states that from September 2001 to August 2002, UK tobacco companies spent £25 million on tobacco advertising. This figure excludes sponsorship and indirect advertising. £11 million was spent on press advertising, £13.2 million went on out door billboards, radio advertising pulled in £714,550 and £106,253 was spent on direct mail.

Ash. (2002).

For many years, sport has been one of the more popular investment choices for tobacco companies, enabling them to promote their brands. The most recent figures estimate that tobacco companies have pledged around £8 million a year, on the sponsorship of sport and an additional £70 million on Formula One in the UK. Extensive resources have been spent further, on shop front and point of sale advertising, promotional offers and brand stretching. This has led to the mainstream appearance of tobacco brand logos on fashion clothing and accessories.

Ash. (2002).

Ash confirms that both tobacco advertising and promotion were banned in the UK on 14 February 2003, due to the passage of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act in December 2002. The Act will also be adhered to throughout the European Union, following an EU Directive. The terms of the UK Act state that tobacco advertising in the print media and on billboards will be prohibited from 14 February 2003, and direct mail and other promotions must end by 14 May 2003. Regulations determining the implementation of the sports sponsorship ban, the banning of brand sharing (indirect advertising) and point of sale advertising will be announced in the near future.

Ash. (2002).

Cigarette advertising has been banned from UK television since 1965, under powers granted by the Television Act 1964. Other forms of advertising and promotion were previously restricted by two voluntary agreements that were negotiated, periodically, between the Government and the tobacco industry. Advertising was covered by one agreement and the other governed tobacco sponsorship of sport.

Unfortunately, the agreements were unsuccessful in reducing advertising and their negotiations had little impact. In the case of exposing children and young people to cigarette publicity, the agreements imposed a ban on billboard tobacco advertising within a 200metre range of schools, but avoided completely, the effect of marketing outside the 200metres.

Ash. (2002).

The Parliamentary Health Select Committee conducted inquiries into the tobacco industry and concluded; “Voluntary agreements have served the industry well and the public badly. Regulations have been seen by tobacco companies as hurdles to be overcome or side-stepped; legislation banning advertising as a challenge, a policy to be systematically undermined by whatever means possible.”

Ash. (2002).

 

For cigarette companies, sponsoring sports was a successful alternative to advertising their brands on television. Ash claims that the companies targeted popular sports such as snooker, motor racing and rugby, which notoriously draw in millions of viewers. This constant appearance of cigarette brand names encouraged viewers to associate cigarettes with their favourite sport, thus adding to the representation that smoking is ‘cool’ and exciting, especially to children. According Ash, research in this area showed that children as young as six, associate brands such as Marlboro with ‘excitement and fast cars’.

Ash. (2002).

As regulations tightened on tobacco advertising, companies were looking further into different styles of advertising. Many found marketing other products with a shared brand name, such as Marlboro Classics clothing and Camel boots, to be successful. For the tobacco industry, this kind of advertising was a loophole in the regulations, but this is also now banned under the terms of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act.

The Ash website includes a warning that, in addition to the above, some tobacco companies have set up websites masquerading as information sites about nightclubs or other events. Young people are inevitably attracted to these websites, where cigarettes are heavily promoted.

In March, 1997, the Centre for Media Education (CME) released a report on the public health concern of that time: "Alcohol and Tobacco on the Web, New Threats to Youth." A total of 66 tobacco sites were examined with regard to their particular appeal (or non-appeal) to children in their marketing techniques. Sites examined were found through search engines, links from other sites, or through articles in the trade press. Due to the small number of popular tobacco brands featured on the internet, sites promoting the lifestyle of smoking or sites selling and distributing tobacco products were included in the analysis.

CME. (1997).

The CME found that the general smoking lifestyle sites, which constituted 36 percent of all sites that were analysed, had the greatest youth appeal. Many of these sites attempted to glamorise smoking through the emulation of celebrities. Common features included pictures of (usually female) celebrities smoking, pro-smoking articles, and smoking advice. The main message of these sites was that smoking is cool.

CME. (1997).

There are many organizations which specialize in preventing young people from indulging in smoking, such as ASH, but three years ago, tobacco companies themselves pledged their support. Their supposedly honest and respectable campaign took a sinister twist when huge British American tobacco companies BAT and Philip Morris were found guilty of fraud over teenage anti-smoking campaigns.

Join now!

Ash. (2000).

The companies spent $3.6m (approximately £2.4m) on an advertising campaign on MTV Europe, which they claimed was designed to persuade a target group of 12-17 year olds not to smoke. The Ash website confirmed, “MTV Europe is shown in 38 European area countries, and is largely youth-focused.” The campaign was launched in April 2001, and ran until July 15. The campaign adopted the form of advertisement films, which were shown on MTV Europe, which depicted European teenagers doing normal, “cool” teenage activities, while being non-smokers.

Ash. (2000).

The tobacco companies adopted a public ...

This is a preview of the whole essay