Explain why cultural ideology constraints fairness and equality in sport for woman

Authors Avatar

Explain why cultural ideology constraints fairness and equality in sport for woman

“Sports equity is about fairness in sport, equality of access, recognising inequalities and taking steps to redress them. It is about changing the structure and culture of sport to ensure it becomes equally accessible to everyone in society whatever their age, gender, race or level of ability” (Sports Council, 1993, p3, cited White, 2003, p3) Throughout this essay cultural ideologies that constraint fairness and equality in sport for woman will be discussed.

One cultural belief is that it was not seen as ‘natural for females to partake in sport. Traditionally woman wanting to participate in sports were given the option to partake in activities such as dance and gymnastic which then progressed to woman being able to participate in all sporting activities. In 2005-06 19% of woman (3.8million) took part in regular sport and active recreation compared to with 24% of men (4.7%). ()

Many sports continue to be seen as less suitable for woman then men, and female participation in the types of activities in which women have traditionally participated (tennis, swimming, gymnastics) is generally seen as more compatible with femininity than their participation in male sports (football, rugby, cricket) This is known as gender ideology which consists of a set of taken-for-granted assumptions about men and woman. An example of this would be that females playing sport are labelled ‘tomboys’ therefore this limits fairness in sport for woman.

Three rationales have been given for opposing woman’s participation;

1. Medical rational; that women are physiologically unsuited to sporting activity and may be damaged by it. Historically sport was developed by men for men. Women were marginalised on the basis of health and medical option. For example it was believed that females participating in sport would damage their reproductive system.

2. The aesthetic rationale; that woman engaging in sport are an unattractive spectacle. An example that goes against this is Anna Cornacova who does not only compete in tennis at the highest level but also models for broachers such as Next catalogue.

Join now!

3. The social rationale; that the qualities and behaviours associated with sport is contrary to real femininity.

The history of woman’s involvement in sport is therefore one of the most substantial exclusions; through informal and formal mean, woman have been debarred from equitable access to sports experiences (Barrie Houlihan, 2003)

It is not just at amateur level that women are disadvantaged in the sporting world but also at elite level. Pierre de Coubertin, founder of the modern Olympics and influential in international sport, publicly opposed woman’s participation in competitive sport. (Barrie Houlihan, 2003) This view had been carried ...

This is a preview of the whole essay